Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

ICU TopicsResuscitation

ICU · Resuscitation

Sepsis hour-1 bundle: updated Surviving Sepsis Campaign 2021 practice

Also known as Hour-1 bundle · Sepsis bundle · Surviving Sepsis Campaign · SSC 2021 · Sepsis six · Sepsis resuscitation

SSC 2021 (Evans): measure lactate and guide resuscitation to decrease it; cultures before antimicrobials if no substantial delay (under 45 min); antimicrobials immediately, ideally within 1 hour of recognition for possible septic shock; at least 30 mL/kg IV crystalloid within the first 3 hours for hypoperfusion or shock (weak); noradrenaline first-line, initial MAP 65 mmHg. Kumar 2006: 7.6% average survival decrease per hour of antimicrobial delay after hypotension over the ensuing 6 hours. Seymour 2017 (n=49,331): 3-hour bundle completion and antibiotic time each OR 1.04 per hour for in-hospital death. PRISM: EGDT 90-day mortality 24.9 vs 25.4%, not better than usual care.

high18 referencesUpdated 3 Sept 202613 min readSource-verified · Sept 2026

Checked against its sources on 3 Sept 2026

Practise this topic

  • 8 MCQs

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic8 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

CICMFFICMEDIC

Red flags

  • Possible septic shock: antimicrobials immediately, ideally within 1 hour of recognition (SSC 2021 strong). Kumar 2006: 7.6% average survival decrease per hour of delay after hypotension over the ensuing 6 hours; Seymour 2017: OR 1.04 per hour to antibiotics
  • At least 30 mL/kg crystalloid within the first 3 hours is a weak SSC 2021 suggestion — not a Rivers-abstract dose. PRISM: EGDT no better than usual care. Then dynamic measures, not rote boluses
  • Noradrenaline first-line (SSC 2021 strong). SOAP II: more arrhythmic events with dopamine (24.1 vs 12.4%); 28-day death 52.5 vs 48.5% not significant overall
  • Sepsis-3 septic shock = vasopressors to maintain MAP 65 mmHg or greater AND lactate greater than 2 mmol/L in the absence of hypovolaemia (hospital mortality greater than 40%)
On this page
Study tools

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic8 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

CICMFFICMEDIC

Red flags

  • Possible septic shock: antimicrobials immediately, ideally within 1 hour of recognition (SSC 2021 strong). Kumar 2006: 7.6% average survival decrease per hour of delay after hypotension over the ensuing 6 hours; Seymour 2017: OR 1.04 per hour to antibiotics
  • At least 30 mL/kg crystalloid within the first 3 hours is a weak SSC 2021 suggestion — not a Rivers-abstract dose. PRISM: EGDT no better than usual care. Then dynamic measures, not rote boluses
  • Noradrenaline first-line (SSC 2021 strong). SOAP II: more arrhythmic events with dopamine (24.1 vs 12.4%); 28-day death 52.5 vs 48.5% not significant overall
  • Sepsis-3 septic shock = vasopressors to maintain MAP 65 mmHg or greater AND lactate greater than 2 mmol/L in the absence of hypovolaemia (hospital mortality greater than 40%)
The one-line answer

SSC 2021 still cites the Hour-1 sepsis bundle, but the timed recommendations are not all a 60-minute checkbox: measure lactate and guide resuscitation to decrease an elevated value; obtain blood cultures before antimicrobials if that causes no substantial delay (the 2016 statement kept in 2021: under 45 minutes); give antimicrobials immediately, ideally within 1 hour of recognition in possible septic shock; give at least 30 mL/kg IV crystalloid within the first 3 hours for sepsis-induced hypoperfusion or septic shock (weak); start noradrenaline first-line to an initial MAP of 65 mmHg, peripherally if central access would delay therapy. Seymour 2017 (New York, n=49,331) found each additional hour to a 3-hour bundle (cultures, antibiotics, lactate) and each hour to antibiotics associated with in-hospital death at OR 1.04 per hour — not a 4-percentage-point absolute mortality rise, and not a faster fluid bolus.[7][11]

Meet the patient

A 65-year-old man presents to ED with confusion, fever 38.8 degrees, RR 28, BP 82/50, lactate 4.5 mmol/L, with clinical signs of a urinary source. The clock starts the moment you recognise sepsis — in possible septic shock, SSC 2021 asks for antimicrobials immediately, ideally within 1 hour of recognition, with the other elements — lactate, cultures, fluids, vasopressors — started alongside.[7]

Sepsis is common, and its burden outlasts the acute episode — survivors are left with new cognitive impairment and functional disability. The intensivist's job distils to five questions asked in the first hour and re-asked every hour thereafter: is this sepsis? What is the bug and where is the source? Is the circulation perfusing the organs? Is the resuscitation adequate? What can I physically remove or drain to stop the infection? The hour-1 bundle operationalises these.[13]

ICU Fellowship (CICM) Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this topic. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the ICU Fellowship (CICM) fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References18ShowHide
  1. [2]Kumar A, Roberts D, Wood KE, et al. Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock Crit Care Med, 2006.PMID 16625125
  2. [3]Semler MW, Self WH, Rice TW, et al. Balanced Crystalloids versus Saline in Critically Ill Adults N Engl J Med, 2018.PMID 29768150
  3. [4]Rowan KM, Angus DC, Bailey M, et al. Early, Goal-Directed Therapy for Septic Shock - A Patient-Level Meta-Analysis N Engl J Med, 2017.PMID 28320242
  4. [5]Venkatesh B, Finfer S, Cohen J, et al. Adjunctive Glucocorticoid Therapy in Patients with Septic Shock N Engl J Med, 2018.PMID 29347874
  5. [6]Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) JAMA, 2016.PMID 26903338
  6. [7]Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021 Intensive Care Med, 2021.PMID 34599691
  7. [8]De Backer D, Biston P, Devriendt J, et al. Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock N Engl J Med, 2010.PMID 20200382
  8. [9]Asfar P, Meziani F, Hamel JF, et al. High versus low blood-pressure target in patients with septic shock N Engl J Med, 2014.PMID 24635770
  9. [10]Bouadma L, Luyt CE, Tubach F, et al. Use of procalcitonin to reduce patients' exposure to antibiotics in intensive care units (PRORATA trial): a multicentre randomised controlled trial Lancet, 2010.PMID 20097417
  10. [11]Seymour CW, Gesten F, Prescott HC, et al. Time to Treatment and Mortality during Mandated Emergency Care for Sepsis N Engl J Med, 2017.PMID 28528569
  11. [12]Annane D, Renault A, Brun-Buisson C, et al. Hydrocortisone plus Fludrocortisone for Adults with Septic Shock N Engl J Med, 2018.PMID 29490185
  12. [13]Iwashyna TJ, Ely EW, Smith DM, et al. Long-term cognitive impairment and functional disability among survivors of severe sepsis JAMA, 2010.PMID 20978258
  13. [14]Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock N Engl J Med, 2001.PMID 11794169
  14. [15]Hernández G, Ospina-Tascón GA, Damiani LP, et al. Effect of a Resuscitation Strategy Targeting Peripheral Perfusion Status vs Serum Lactate Levels on 28-Day Mortality Among Patients With Septic Shock: The ANDROMEDA-SHOCK Randomized Clinical Trial JAMA, 2019.PMID 30772908
  15. [16]Lamontagne F, Masse MH, Menard J, et al. Intravenous Vitamin C in Adults with Sepsis in the Intensive Care Unit N Engl J Med, 2022.PMID 35704292
  16. [17]Meyhoff TS, Hjortrup PB, Wetterslev J, et al. Restriction of Intravenous Fluid in ICU Patients with Septic Shock N Engl J Med, 2022.PMID 35709019
  17. [18]Shapiro NI, Douglas IS, Brower RG, et al. Early Restrictive or Liberal Fluid Management for Sepsis-Induced Hypotension N Engl J Med, 2023.PMID 36688507
  18. [19]Fowler AA 3rd, Truwit JD, Hite RD, et al. Effect of Vitamin C Infusion on Organ Failure and Biomarkers of Inflammation and Vascular Injury in Patients With Sepsis and Severe Acute Respiratory Failure: The CITRIS-ALI Randomized Clinical Trial JAMA, 2019.PMID 31573637

Test yourself

Practise what you just read

  • 8 MCQs
ICU Fellowship (CICM) Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete ICU Fellowship (CICM) library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousSepsis and Septic Shock — Comprehensive Integrated (SSC 2021, Hour-1 Bundle, Vasopressors, Source Control)resuscitationNextSeptic shock: SSC 2021 integrated — hour-1 bundle, vasopressors, and outcomesResuscitation