Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

ICU TopicsResuscitation

ICU · Resuscitation

The Principles of Resuscitation

Also known as Resuscitation · Fluid resuscitation · Fluid responsiveness · Oxygen delivery · Goals of resuscitation · Early goal-directed therapy · Massive transfusion

Resuscitation is the restoration of oxygen delivery to the tissues in the patient in shock, and it is the first act of intensive care. This topic builds the examiner's framework on five ideas. First, the goal — the global oxygen delivery and the perfusion, and the principle that resuscitation targets the perfusion, not a single pressure. Second, fluid — when to give it (only the fluid-responsive patient benefits), how to judge responsiveness (the dynamic indices, the passive leg raise), and the choice of fluid (balanced crystalloids over saline; colloids offer no outcome advantage). Third, blood — the restrictive transfusion threshold and the damage-control ratio in massive haemorrhage. Fourth, the endpoints of resuscitation — the lactate clearance and the peripheral perfusion (the capillary refill), not the central venous pressure. Fifth, the evidence — the EGDT era and its refinement by ProCESS and ARISE, the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK capillary-refill strategy, and the shift from protocolised targets to individualised, perfusion-directed resuscitation.

high31 referencesUpdated 20 Aug 202614 min readVerification in progress

Practise this topic

  • 8 MCQs

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic8 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

CICMFFICMEDICESICMSociety_CCM
On this page
Study tools

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic8 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

CICMFFICMEDICESICMSociety_CCM
The one-line answer

Resuscitation restores the oxygen delivery and the perfusion of the patient in shock. Give fluid only to the fluid-responsive patient — judged by the dynamic indices (pulse-pressure variation, passive leg raise), never by the central venous pressure[4][5][6] — and prefer balanced crystalloids (SMART)[7], since colloids confer no outcome advantage (CRISTAL, SAFE)[8][11] and the starches actively harm (6S, CHEST)[12][13]. Transfuse to a restrictive 70 g/L threshold (TRICC)[9], and in massive haemorrhage use a 1:1:1 damage-control ratio (PROPPR) with tranexamic acid early (CRASH-2)[27][28]. Target the perfusion — the lactate clearance and the capillary refill (ANDROMEDA-SHOCK)[10] — at the lowest mean pressure that achieves it. The EGDT protocol (Rivers)[1] is no longer superior to usual care (ProCESS, ARISE, ProMISe)[2][3][20]; the modern approach is individualised and perfusion-directed.

Meet the patient

A 60-year-old woman with septic shock from a urinary source has received 1.5 litres of Hartmann's. Her MAP is 60, lactate 3.5, central venous pressure 12 mmHg. The registrar wants to give another bolus "because the CVP is low." The CVP is the wrong number — the question is whether her heart will respond to more fluid, and the CVP cannot answer it.[4]

Resuscitation is the first act of intensive care: restore enough oxygen delivery to meet the tissues' demand, and do so before the hypoxia of under-resuscitation gives way to the oedema, the congestion, and the abdominal compartment of over-resuscitation. The framework rests on five ideas — the goal, the fluid, the blood, the endpoints, and the evidence — and each has been refined by two decades of trials.[1][2]

ICU Fellowship (CICM) Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this topic. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the ICU Fellowship (CICM) fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References31ShowHide
  1. [1]Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock N Engl J Med, 2001.PMID 11794169
  2. [2]Yealy DM, Kellum JA, Huang DT, et al. A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock N Engl J Med, 2014.PMID 24635773
  3. [3]Peake SL, Delaney A, Bailey M, et al. Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock N Engl J Med, 2014.PMID 25272316
  4. [4]Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares Chest, 2008.PMID 18628220
  5. [5]Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, et al. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2000.PMID 10903232
  6. [6]Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D, et al. Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill Crit Care Med, 2006.PMID 16540963
  7. [7]Semler MW, Self WH, Wanderer JP, et al. Balanced Crystalloids versus Saline in Critically Ill Adults N Engl J Med, 2018.PMID 29485925
  8. [8]Annane D, Siami S, Jaber S, et al. Effects of fluid resuscitation with colloids vs crystalloids on mortality in critically ill patients presenting with hypovolemic shock: the CRISTAL randomized trial JAMA, 2013.PMID 24108515
  9. [9]Hébert PC, Wells G, Blajchman MA, et al. A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial of transfusion requirements in critical care. Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care Investigators, Canadian Critical Care Trials Group N Engl J Med, 1999.PMID 9971864
  10. [10]Hernández G, Ospina-Tascón GA, Damiani LP, et al. Effect of a Resuscitation Strategy Targeting Peripheral Perfusion Status vs Serum Lactate Levels on 28-Day Mortality Among Patients With Septic Shock: The ANDROMEDA-SHOCK Randomized Clinical Trial JAMA, 2019.PMID 30772908
  11. [11]Finfer S, Bellomo R, Boyce N, French J, Myburgh J, Norton R; SAFE Study Investigators. A comparison of albumin and saline for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit N Engl J Med, 2004.PMID 15163774
  12. [12]Myburgh JA, Finfer S, Bellomo R, et al. Hydroxyethyl starch or saline for fluid resuscitation in intensive care N Engl J Med, 2012.PMID 23075127
  13. [13]Perner A, Haase N, Guttormsen AB, et al. Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 versus Ringer's acetate in severe sepsis N Engl J Med, 2012.PMID 22738085
  14. [14]De Backer D, Biston P, Devriendt J, et al. Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock N Engl J Med, 2010.PMID 20200382
  15. [15]Russell JA, Walley KR, Singer J, et al. Vasopressin versus norepinephrine infusion in patients with septic shock N Engl J Med, 2008.PMID 18305265
  16. [16]Gordon AC, Mason AJ, Thirunavukkarasu N, et al. Effect of Early Vasopressin vs Norepinephrine on Kidney Failure in Patients With Septic Shock: The VANISH Randomized Clinical Trial JAMA, 2016.PMID 27483065
  17. [17]Asfar P, Meziani F, Hamel JF, et al. High versus low blood-pressure target in patients with septic shock N Engl J Med, 2014.PMID 24635770
  18. [18]Caironi P, Tognoni G, Masson S, et al. Albumin replacement in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock N Engl J Med, 2014.PMID 24635772
  19. [19]Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Executive Summary: Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for the Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021 Crit Care Med, 2021.PMID 34643578
  20. [20]Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power GS, et al. Protocolised Management In Sepsis (ProMISe): a multicentre randomised controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of early, goal-directed, protocolised resuscitation for emerging septic shock Health Technol Assess, 2015.PMID 26597979
  21. [21]Monnet X, Osman D, Ridel C, et al. Predicting volume responsiveness by using the end-expiratory occlusion in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients Crit Care Med, 2009.PMID 19237902
  22. [22]Muller L, Toumi M, Bousquet PJ, et al. An increase in aortic blood flow after an infusion of 100 ml colloid over 1 minute can predict fluid responsiveness: the mini-fluid challenge study Anesthesiology, 2011.PMID 21792056
  23. [23]Ait-Oufella H, Lemoinne S, Boelle PY, et al. Mottling score predicts survival in septic shock Intensive Care Med, 2011.PMID 21373821
  24. [24]Nguyen HB, Rivers EP, Knoblich BP, et al. Early lactate clearance is associated with improved outcome in severe sepsis and septic shock Crit Care Med, 2004.PMID 15286537
  25. [25]Jansen TC, van Bommel J, Mulder PG, et al. The prognostic value of blood lactate levels relative to that of vital signs in the pre-hospital setting: a pilot study Crit Care, 2008.PMID 19091118
  26. [26]Seymour CW, Gesten F, Prescott HC, et al. Time to Treatment and Mortality during Mandated Emergency Care for Sepsis N Engl J Med, 2017.PMID 28528569
  27. [27]Holcomb JB, Tilley BC, Baraniuk S, et al. Transfusion of plasma, platelets, and red blood cells in a 1:1:1 vs a 1:1:2 ratio and mortality in patients with severe trauma: the PROPPR randomized clinical trial JAMA, 2015.PMID 25647203
  28. [28]Shakur H, Roberts I, Bautista R, et al. Effects of tranexamic acid on death, vascular occlusive events, and blood transfusion in trauma patients with significant haemorrhage (CRASH-2): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial Lancet, 2010.PMID 20554319
  29. [29]Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) JAMA, 2016.PMID 26903338
  30. [30]Annane D, Renault A, Brun-Buisson C, et al. Hydrocortisone plus Fludrocortisone for Adults with Septic Shock N Engl J Med, 2018.PMID 29490185
  31. [31]Wiedemann HP, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, et al. Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury N Engl J Med, 2006.PMID 16714767

Test yourself

Practise what you just read

  • 8 MCQs
ICU Fellowship (CICM) Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete ICU Fellowship (CICM) library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousSevere burns managementResuscitationNextTrauma resuscitation and primary survey (ATLS)Resuscitation