ICU · Respiratory
Mechanical ventilation: advanced modes and waveforms
Also known as Advanced ventilation modes · Pressure control vs volume control · Ventilator waveforms · Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) · Dual control modes
Advanced mechanical ventilation modes offer additional options for difficult-to-ventilate patients. VOLUME CONTROL (VC): guaranteed tidal volume, variable pressure — safe, standard. PRESSURE CONTROL (PC): guaranteed inspiratory pressure, variable volume — better gas distribution in heterogeneous lung (ARDS). DUAL CONTROL (PRVC, AutoFlow): volume-targeted, pressure-limited — combines benefits. AIRWAY PRESSURE RELEASE VENTILATION (APRV): continuous positive pressure (Phigh) with brief release (Plow) — allows spontaneous breathing throughout, maintains alveolar recruitment. HIGH-FLOW NASAL OXYGEN (HFNO): not a ventilator but bridges NIV and intubation. PROPORTIONAL ASSIST VENTILATION (PAV): proportional support based on patient effort — near-physiological. NEURALLY ADJUSTED VENTILATORY ASSIST (NAVA): diaphragm EMG-triggered — most physiological synchrony. Waveform analysis: pressure, flow, volume curves — identify asynchrony, leaks, obstruction.
Practise this topic
On this page
Study tools
Your progress
Saved on this device.
Target exams
Red flags
- Ventilator asynchrony: double triggering, breath stacking, flow starvation — worsens outcomes and VILI
- APRV: not suitable for severe COPD (dynamic hyperinflation risk from inverse ratio)
- No advanced mode has proven mortality benefit over standard lung-protective ventilation
- Waveform analysis: scalloped inspiratory flow curve = flow starvation (increase flow rate)
Meet the patient
A 62-year-old man with community-acquired pneumonia is ventilated on volume control for moderate ARDS (PaO₂/FiO₂ 110 — moderate by the Berlin bands; Vt 6 mL/kg PBW, plateau 27, within the lung-protective ceiling of 30 cmH₂O). His SpO₂ dips every time the physiotherapist suctions, the flow scalar shows a concave hollow on every pressure-support breath, and the bedside nurse reports he is "fighting the ventilator" — one of the roughly one in four ventilated patients with a high rate of patient-ventilator asynchrony.[11][13][14]
The registrar reaches for the advanced-mode menu. Stop. The question is not which advanced mode — it is what is the mismatch on the waveform, and is the lung being protected first. Two answers have to come before the mode choice: lung-protective settings are running (Vt 6 mL/kg of predicted body weight with plateau pressure kept at or below 30 cmH₂O, per the ARDS Network trial, and driving pressure minimised — the ventilation variable most strongly associated with survival), and the asynchrony pattern is named. Only then does picking a mode make sense.[11][12]
The two facts that decide the next hour are the two facts that decide every advanced mode decision: is the lung protected? (the ventilator settings, the plateau, the driving pressure) and is the patient synchronous? (the waveforms). Hold those, and the menu collapses from a wall of acronyms into a few targeted choices.[1][28]
SAQ — APRV as a rescue mode in moderate-severe ARDS
10 minutes · 10 marks
A 55-year-old man with pneumococcal pneumonia is intubated for severe ARDS (PaO₂/FiO₂ 95 on FiO₂ 0.8, PEEP 14). On volume-control lung-protective ventilation (Vt 6 mL/kg PBW, plateau 29 cmH₂O, driving pressure 15) he remains hypoxaemic with SpO₂ 88%, and prone ventilation is only transiently effective. The consultant suggests a trial of airway pressure release ventilation (APRV). He is on no vasopressors and has an intact respiratory drive.
SAQ — HFOV in adult ARDS: why it was abandoned
10 minutes · 10 marks
You are asked to review a unit protocol that lists high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) as a rescue option for severe ARDS. A junior colleague asks why the oscillators in the hospital appear to be unused, and whether HFOV should be offered to a patient with refractory hypoxaemia (PaO₂/FiO₂ 70) who has failed proning and optimised conventional ventilation.
References28ShowHide
- [1]Chatburn RL, El-Khatib M, Mireles-Cabodevila E A taxonomy for mechanical ventilation: 10 fundamental maxims Respir Care, 2014.PMID 25118309
- [2]Slutsky AS, Ranieri VM Ventilator-induced lung injury N Engl J Med, 2013.PMID 24283226
- [3]Ferguson ND, Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, et al. High-frequency oscillation in early acute respiratory distress syndrome N Engl J Med, 2013.PMID 23339639
- [4]Young D, Lamb SE, Shah S, et al. High-frequency oscillation for acute respiratory distress syndrome N Engl J Med, 2013.PMID 23339638
- [5]Vaporidi K NAVA and PAV+ for lung and diaphragm protection Curr Opin Crit Care, 2020.PMID 31738231
- [6]Mirabella L, Cinnella G, Costa R, et al. Patient-Ventilator Asynchronies: Clinical Implications and Practical Solutions Respir Care, 2020.PMID 32665426
- [7]Kirakli C, Naz I, Ediboglu O, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing the ventilation duration between adaptive support ventilation and pressure assist/control ventilation in medical patients in the ICU Chest, 2015.PMID 25742308
- [8]Patel R, Thompson J, Panchal V, et al. Safety, Efficacy, and Clinical Outcomes of APRV in ARDS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis J Intensive Care Med, 2026.PMID 42033378
- [9]Brochard L, Rauss A, Benito S, et al. Comparison of three methods of gradual withdrawal from ventilatory support during weaning from mechanical ventilation Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 1994.PMID 7921460
- [10]Esteban A, Frutos F, Tobin MJ, et al. A comparison of four methods of weaning patients from mechanical ventilation. Spanish Lung Failure Collaborative Group N Engl J Med, 1995.PMID 7823995
- [11]Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, et al. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome N Engl J Med, 2000.PMID 10793162
- [12]Amato MB, Meade MO, Slutsky AS, et al. Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome N Engl J Med, 2015.PMID 25693014
- [13]Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition JAMA, 2012.PMID 22797452
- [14]Thille AW, Rodriguez P, Cabello B, et al. Patient-ventilator asynchrony during assisted mechanical ventilation Intensive Care Med, 2006.PMID 16896854
- [15]Kacmarek RM, Pirrone M, Berra L Assisted mechanical ventilation: the future is now! BMC Anesthesiol, 2015.PMID 26215886
- [16]Kallio M, Peltoniemi O, Anttila E, et al. Electrical activity of the diaphragm during neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in pediatric patients Pediatr Pulmonol, 2015.PMID 25103680
- [17]Sinderby C, Navalesi P, Beck J, et al. Neural control of mechanical ventilation in respiratory failure Nat Med, 1999.PMID 10581089
- [18]Walkey AJ, Nair S, Papadopoulos S, et al. Use of airway pressure release ventilation is associated with a reduced incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients with pulmonary contusion J Trauma, 2011.PMID 20526208
- [19]Mallory P, Cheifetz I A comprehensive review of the use and understanding of airway pressure release ventilation Expert Rev Respir Med, 2020.PMID 31869259
- [20]Fredericks AS, Bunker MP, Gliga LA, et al. Airway Pressure Release Ventilation: A Review of the Evidence, Theoretical Benefits, and Alternative Titration Strategies Clin Med Insights Circ Respir Pulm Med, 2020.PMID 32076372
- [21]Sklar MC, Fan E, Goligher EC High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation in Adults With ARDS: Past, Present, and Future Chest, 2017.PMID 28684287
- [22]Meyers M, Rodrigues N, Ari A High-frequency oscillatory ventilation: A narrative review Can J Respir Ther, 2019.PMID 31297448
- [23]Reddy VG Auto-PEEP: how to detect and how to prevent--a review Middle East J Anaesthesiol, 2005.PMID 16438005
- [24]Costa R, Navalesi P, Spinazzola G, et al. Influence of ventilator settings on patient-ventilator synchrony during pressure support ventilation with different interfaces Intensive Care Med, 2010.PMID 20502872
- [25]Tassaux D, Gainnier M, Battisti A, Jolliet P Impact of expiratory trigger setting on delayed cycling and inspiratory muscle workload Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2005.PMID 16109983
- [26]Baedorf Kassis EN, Bastos AB, Schaefer MS, et al. Adaptive Support Ventilation and Lung-Protective Ventilation in ARDS Respir Care, 2022.PMID 35973716
- [27]Sulemanji DS, Marchese A, Wysocki M, Kacmarek RM Adaptive support ventilation with and without end-tidal CO2 closed loop control versus conventional ventilation Intensive Care Med, 2013.PMID 23151992
- [28]Mireles-Cabodevila E, Hatipoğlu U, Chatburn RL A rational framework for selecting modes of ventilation Respir Care, 2013.PMID 22710796