Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

ICU TopicsNeurocritical care / post-arrest

ICU · Neurocritical care / post-arrest

Neuro-Prognostication After Cardiac Arrest — The 72-Hour Multimodal Rule

Also known as Neuro-prognostication · Post-anoxic coma · Post-cardiac-arrest prognostication · Anoxic brain injury · 72-hour rule · Somatosensory evoked potentials · SSEP · N20 · NSE · Self-fulfilling prophecy · TTM2 · Multimodal prognostication · ERC/ESICM

The neuro-prognostication after a cardiac arrest is deferred until at least 72 hours after the return of the spontaneous circulation, with the patient normothermic and off the sedation. The principle is the MULTIMODAL assessment — no single predictor determines the prognosis, because the falsely pessimistic prediction creates the self-fulfilling prophecy (the early withdrawal of the care). The predictors (examined together): the absent brainstem reflexes (the pupillary, the corneal), the absent motor response to pain, the bilateral absent N20 on the somatosensory evoked potentials (the most reliable single test), the highly malignant EEG patterns (suppression with periodic discharges, burst-suppression), the elevated neuron-specific enolase, and the MRI diffusion anoxic pattern. The TTM tri…

high18 referencesUpdated 20 Aug 202618 min readVerification in progress

Practise this topic

  • 8 MCQs

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic8 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

CICMFFICMEDIC
On this page
Study tools

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic8 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

CICMFFICMEDIC
The one-paragraph exam answer

Neuro-prognostication after a cardiac arrest is deferred until at least 72 hours after the return of spontaneous circulation, with the patient normothermic and off the sedation. The two governing principles are the multimodal assessment (no single predictor determines the prognosis) and the avoidance of the self-fulfilling prophecy — a falsely pessimistic prediction that drives the early withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy, which then causes the death that appears to confirm it. The predictors are examined together: the absent brainstem reflexes (pupillary, corneal), the absent motor response, the bilateral absent N20 on the SSEP (the most reliable single test), the highly malignant EEG patterns (suppression with periodic discharges, burst-suppression), the elevated NSE, and the MRI diffusion anoxic pattern. The ERC/ESICM algorithm is physician-led, multidisciplinary, and deferral-first: when the findings are discordant, wait and repeat.[3][2]

Meet the patient

A 58-year-old man suffers an out-of-hospital VF arrest with immediate bystander CPR; the ROSC is achieved after 25 minutes. He is intubated, sedated, and cooled. At 78 hours post-ROSC he remains comatose (GCS M4), has been normothermic for 24 hours, and the sedation has been off for 30 hours. The consultant asks you to prognosticate.[3]

Hold two principles and the whole topic holds together: has enough time passed and have the confounders cleared? (the prerequisites gate everything) and are the predictors concordant? (a single test, however reliable, never decides the withdrawal). Only when both are satisfied does the multimodal assessment begin.[3]

ICU Fellowship (CICM) Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this topic. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the ICU Fellowship (CICM) fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References18ShowHide
  1. [1]Nielsen N, Wetterslev J, Cronberg T, et al. Targeted temperature management at 33°C versus 36°C after cardiac arrest N Engl J Med, 2013.PMID 24237006
  2. [2]Nolan JP, Sandroni C, Böttiger BW, et al. European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Guidelines 2021: Post-resuscitation care Resuscitation, 2021.PMID 33773827
  3. [3]Sandroni C, Cariou A, Cavallaro F, et al. Prognostication in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest: an advisory statement from the European Resuscitation Council and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Resuscitation, 2014.PMID 25438253
  4. [4]Sandroni C, D'Arrigo S, Cacciola S, et al. Prediction of poor neurological outcome in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest: a systematic review Intensive Care Med, 2020.PMID 32915254
  5. [5]Sandroni C, D'Arrigo S, Cacciola S, et al. Prediction of good neurological outcome in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest: a systematic review Intensive Care Med, 2022.PMID 35244745
  6. [6]Westhall E, Rossetti AO, van Rootselaar AF, et al. Standardized EEG interpretation accurately predicts prognosis after cardiac arrest Neurology, 2016.PMID 26865516
  7. [7]Dankiewicz J, Cronberg T, Lilja G, et al. Hypothermia versus Normothermia after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest N Engl J Med, 2021.PMID 34133859
  8. [8]Sandroni C, Nolan JP, Cronberg T, et al. ERC-ESICM guidelines on temperature control after cardiac arrest in adults Intensive Care Med, 2022.PMID 35089409
  9. [9]Sharma K, John M, Zhang S, et al. Serum Neuron-Specific Enolase Thresholds for Predicting Postcardiac Arrest Outcome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Neurology, 2022.PMID 34663643
  10. [10]Tolan NV, Vidal-Folch N, Algeciras-Schimnich A, et al. Individualized correction of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) measurement in hemolyzed serum samples Clin Chim Acta, 2013.PMID 23778024
  11. [11]Nome RV, Paus E, Gehin JE, et al. Managing hemolysis in serum neuron-specific enolase measurements - an automated algorithm for routine practice Scand J Clin Lab Invest, 2024.PMID 38853575
  12. [12]Moseby-Knappe M, Mattsson N, Nielsen N, et al. Serum Neurofilament Light Chain for Prognosis of Outcome After Cardiac Arrest JAMA Neurol, 2019.PMID 30383090
  13. [13]Hirsch KG, Mlynash M, Eyngorn I, et al. Prognostic value of diffusion-weighted MRI for post-cardiac arrest coma Neurology, 2020.PMID 32269116
  14. [14]Paul M, Bougouin W, Geri G, et al. Delayed awakening after cardiac arrest: prevalence and risk factors in the Parisian registry Intensive Care Med, 2016.PMID 27098348
  15. [15]Zanyk-McLean K, Sawyer KN, Paternoster R, et al. Time to Awakening Is Often Delayed in Patients Who Receive Targeted Temperature Management After Cardiac Arrest Ther Hypothermia Temp Manag, 2017.PMID 27860555
  16. [16]Malakooti M, Heidari A, Motieian M, et al. Lance-Adams Syndrome: An Updated Review of a Rare Post-Hypoxic Complication Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov, 2025.PMID 41019765
  17. [17]Moseby-Knappe M, Westhall E, Backman S, et al. Performance of a guideline-recommended algorithm for prognostication of poor neurological outcome after cardiac arrest Intensive Care Med, 2020.PMID 32494928
  18. [18]Reynolds AS, Claassen J Treatment of Seizures and Postanoxic Status Epilepticus Semin Neurol, 2017.PMID 28147416

Test yourself

Practise what you just read

  • 8 MCQs
ICU Fellowship (CICM) Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete ICU Fellowship (CICM) library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousMassive Transfusion & Trauma Coagulopathy — The Lethal Triad, TXA & 1:1:1Haematology / traumaNextNeutropenic Sepsis — The Golden Hour & the Antipseudomonal Beta-LactamInfection / oncology