Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

ICU TopicsNeurocritical Care

ICU · Neurocritical Care

Acute severe head injury: multimodal monitoring

Also known as Multimodal neuromonitoring · Brain tissue oxygenation (PbtO2) · Microdialysis · Brain injury monitoring · LICOX · External ventricular drain (EVD) · Intraparenchymal bolt · Cerebral microdialysis · Lactate/pyruvate ratio · Jugular venous bulb oximetry (SjvO2) · Continuous EEG (cEEG) · Non-convulsive status epilepticus · Pressure reactivity index (PRx) · Transcranial Doppler

Multimodal neuromonitoring in severe TBI: ICP treated above 22, brain hypoxia below 15 mmHg (BOOST-II), microdialysis crisis (LPR with low glucose), continuous EEG seizures, PRx/CPPopt and TCD vasospasm, BEST:TRIP, transfusion and EVD infection.

high21 referencesUpdated 13 Oct 20267 min readSource-verified · Oct 2026

Checked against its sources on 13 Oct 2026

Practise this topic

  • 8 MCQs

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic8 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

CICMFFICMEDIC

Red flags

  • PbtO2 below 15 mmHg is brain hypoxia with independent prognostic weight — investigate delivery
  • LPR 40+ with brain glucose under 0.7 mmol/L is metabolic crisis — read pyruvate
  • Nonconvulsive seizures in 19% of monitored patients — coma is the strongest predictor
  • ICP monitoring alone misses secondary brain injury
  • Seizures during barbiturate coma need continuous EEG — paralysis masks them
On this page
Study tools

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic8 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

CICMFFICMEDIC

Red flags

  • PbtO2 below 15 mmHg is brain hypoxia with independent prognostic weight — investigate delivery
  • LPR 40+ with brain glucose under 0.7 mmol/L is metabolic crisis — read pyruvate
  • Nonconvulsive seizures in 19% of monitored patients — coma is the strongest predictor
  • ICP monitoring alone misses secondary brain injury
  • Seizures during barbiturate coma need continuous EEG — paralysis masks them
[2]

A 24-year-old man with severe diffuse TBI has an ICP in the mid-teens and CPP in the seventies — both inside target — but a PbtO2 below 15 mmHg. Brain hypoxia below 15 mmHg carries its own prognostic weight after adjustment for ICP and CPP, so the normal pressure does not close the question.[9]

What the sources support
  1. Standard ICP monitoring may miss episodes of secondary brain injury — multimodality monitoring (PbtO2, microdialysis, regional CBF) can help target therapy.[2]
  2. Brain hypoxia (PbtO2 below 15 mmHg) is independently associated with poor prognosis after adjusting for ICP, CPP, age, GCS, Marshall grade and APACHE II.[9]
  3. Metabolic crisis is LPR at least 40 with brain glucose under 0.7 mmol/L.[10]
  4. Electrographic seizures occur in 19% of monitored critically ill patients, 92% exclusively non-convulsive.[5]
  5. ICP-guided care was not shown superior to imaging-plus-examination in the BEST:TRIP trial of severe TBI — the value lies in the protocol around the monitor.[7]

ICP — treat above 22, and know what the tiers are

The BTF fourth edition recommends treatment of ICP sustained above 22 mmHg, a recommendation derived mainly from a single retrospective analysis of 459 TBI patients that aimed to identify management thresholds for ICP, CPP and PRx.[21] An external ventricular drain both measures and drains; the silver-impregnated catheter did not significantly reduce catheter-related CSF infection (pooled OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.46-1.08), though Gram-positive infections were fewer.[13]

The 2017 medical review summarises the rest of the BTF landscape: decompressive craniectomy is not recommended to improve 6-month outcomes in patients without a mass lesion and refractory ICP (DECRA, 155 patients); RESCUEicp randomised patients with ICP sustained above 25 mmHg for 1-12 hours after aggressive medical management; prophylactic hyperventilation and corticosteroids are addressed by dedicated recommendations; phenytoin carries a Level II A recommendation for 7 days post injury for early post-traumatic seizure prevention.[21]

The counterpoint is BEST:TRIP — 324 severe TBI patients in Bolivia and Ecuador randomised to ICP-monitoring-based care (treat at 20 mmHg or less) or imaging-and-examination-based care, with no shown superiority for monitoring.[7]

ICP devices — what the sources say
DeviceEvidence position
External ventricular drainMeasures and drains CSF; CSF infection is the primary placement complication
Silver-impregnated EVDNo significant reduction in overall catheter-related CSF infection (OR 0.71); Gram-positive infections lower (OR 0.27)
Parenchymal boltAn option when ventricles are small — the infection comparison is not in the cached sources
[13]
ICU Fellowship (CICM) Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this topic. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the ICU Fellowship (CICM) fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References21ShowHide
  1. [1]Carney N, Totten AM, O'Reilly C, et al. Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Fourth Edition. Neurosurgery, 2017.PMID 27654000
  2. [2]Oddo M, Villa F, Citerio G Brain multimodality monitoring: an update. Current opinion in critical care, 2012.PMID 22322259
  3. [3]Okonkwo DO, Shutter LA, Moore C, et al. Brain Oxygen Optimization in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Phase-II: A Phase II Randomized Trial. Critical care medicine, 2017.PMID 29028696
  4. [4]Le Roux P, Menon DK, Citerio G, et al. Consensus summary statement of the International Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference on Multimodality Monitoring in Neurocritical Care : a statement for healthcare professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive care medicine, 2014.PMID 25138226
  5. [5]Claassen J, Mayer SA, Kowalski RG, et al. Detection of electrographic seizures with continuous EEG monitoring in critically ill patients. Neurology, 2004.PMID 15159471
  6. [6]Hutchinson PJ, Jalloh I, Helmy A, et al. Consensus statement from the 2014 International Microdialysis Forum. Intensive care medicine, 2015.PMID 26194024
  7. [7]Chesnut RM, Temkin N, Carney N, et al. A trial of intracranial-pressure monitoring in traumatic brain injury. The New England journal of medicine, 2012.PMID 23234472
  8. [8]Stocchetti N, Zoerle T, Carbonara M Intracranial pressure management in patients with traumatic brain injury: an update. Current opinion in critical care, 2017.PMID 28157822
  9. [9]Oddo M, Levine JM, Mackenzie L, et al. Brain hypoxia is associated with short-term outcome after severe traumatic brain injury independently of intracranial hypertension and low cerebral perfusion pressure. Neurosurgery, 2011.PMID 21673608
  10. [10]Helbok R, Schmidt JM, Kurtz P, et al. Systemic glucose and brain energy metabolism after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurocritical care, 2010.PMID 20135362
  11. [11]Ko SB, Choi HA, Parikh G, et al. Multimodality monitoring for cerebral perfusion pressure optimization in comatose patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke, 2011.PMID 21852615
  12. [12]Kramer AH, Le Roux P Red Blood Cell Transfusion and Transfusion Alternatives in Traumatic Brain Injury. Current treatment options in neurology, 2012.PMID 22314930
  13. [13]Atkinson RA, Fikrey L, Vail A, et al. Silver-impregnated external-ventricular-drain-related cerebrospinal fluid infections: a meta-analysis. The Journal of hospital infection, 2016.PMID 26601606
  14. [14]Herman ST, Abend NS, Bleck TP, et al. Consensus statement on continuous EEG in critically ill adults and children, part I: indications. Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society, 2015.PMID 25626778
  15. [15]Kapur J, Elm J, Chamberlain JM, et al. Randomized Trial of Three Anticonvulsant Medications for Status Epilepticus. The New England journal of medicine, 2019.PMID 31774955
  16. [16]Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Kirkpatrick P, et al. Continuous assessment of the cerebral vasomotor reactivity in head injury. Neurosurgery, 1997.PMID 9218290
  17. [17]Donnelly J, Czosnyka M, Adams H, et al. Pressure Reactivity-Based Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure in a Traumatic Brain Injury Cohort. Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement, 2018.PMID 29492563
  18. [18]Lindegaard KF, Nornes H, Bakke SJ, et al. Cerebral vasospasm diagnosis by means of angiography and blood velocity measurements. Acta neurochirurgica, 1989.PMID 2683600
  19. [19]Koskinen LD, Sundström N, Hägglund L, et al. Prostacyclin Affects the Relation Between Brain Interstitial Glycerol and Cerebrovascular Pressure Reactivity in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. Neurocritical care, 2019.PMID 31123992
  20. [20]Trinka E, Leitinger M Management of Status Epilepticus, Refractory Status Epilepticus, and Super-refractory Status Epilepticus. Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn.), 2022.PMID 35393970
  21. [21]Marehbian J, Muehlschlegel S, Edlow BL, et al. Medical Management of the Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Patient. Neurocritical care, 2017.PMID 28573388

Test yourself

Practise what you just read

  • 8 MCQs
ICU Fellowship (CICM) Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete ICU Fellowship (CICM) library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousAcute Raised Intracranial Pressure and Traumatic Brain Injury — Comprehensive Neurocritical Careneurocritical careNextAcute Spinal Cord Injury and Neurogenic Shock — Comprehensive ICU Managementneurocritical-care