ICU · neurocritical-care
ICP Monitoring and Multimodal Neuromonitoring — Comprehensive ICU Management
Also known as Intracranial pressure monitoring · ICP monitor · External ventricular drain · EVD · Intraparenchymal bolt · Codman probe · Camino probe · Cerebral perfusion pressure · CPP · Brain tissue oxygen · PbtO2 · LICOX · Cerebral microdialysis · Jugular venous bulb oximetry · SjvO2 · Multimodality neuromonitoring · Monroe-Kellie doctrine · ICP waveform · Percussion wave · Tidal wave
Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is the cornerstone of neurocritical care for severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and other intracranial hypertension states. The MONROE-KELLIE DOCTRINE governs the rigid vault: volume = brain (80%) + blood (10%) + CSF (10%) — an increase in one component MUST be offset by a decrease in another, or ICP rises. Normal ICP is 5-15 mmHg (recumbent). INTRACRANIAL HYPERTENSION (ICH) = ICP 22 mmHg (BTF 4th edition treatment threshold). DEVICES: (1) EXTERNAL VENTRICULAR DRAIN (EVD) — the GOLD STANDARD — catheter in frontal horn of lateral ventricle, transduced against a reference (external auditory meatus) — MEASURES ICP AND drains CSF (therapeutic + diagnostic) — BUT highest infection rate (pooled ventriculostomy-related infection about 8.6-11%); (2) INTRAPARENCHYMAL BOLT (Codman, Camino, Raumedic) — fibreoptic/strain-gauge probe bolted into brain parenchyma — LOWER infection (<2%), continuous reading, zero-drift over time, NO CSF drainage — most common in modern practice; (3) SUBDURAL/EPIDURAL sensors — LESS ACCURATE (overestimate/underestimate), rarely used now. ICP WAVEFORM: three peaks per cardiac cycle — P1 PERCUSSION (arterial pulsation — relatively constant), P2 TIDAL (brain COMPLIANCE — rises when compliance falls), P3 RESPIRATORY/DCOUP (venous/respiratory). P2 RISING ABOVE P1 = the brain has EXHAUSTED its compliance reserves = impending intracranial hypertension — a premonitory sign even if the MEAN ICP looks acceptable. CEREBRAL PERFUSION PRESSURE (CPP) = MAP − ICP; target 60-70 mmHg (BTF 4th ed). CPP <60 = cerebral ischaemia (secondary injury); CPP 70 = no added benefit AND increased ARDS risk (from the Robertson/Contant data — aggressive fluid/vasopressor-driven high CPP floods the injured lung). MULTIMODAL NEUROMONITORING recognises that ICP ALONE misses regional ischaemia — PbtO2 (brain tissue oxygen, LICOX/Neurotrend probe — target 20 mmHg — complements ICP), cerebral MICRODIALYSIS (lactate/pyruvate ratio over about 25 = disturbed oxidative metabolism; glycerol and glutamate = cell damage), JUGULAR VENOUS BULB OXIMETRY (SjvO2 <50% = global cerebral hypoxia, 90% = hyperaemia), and CONTINUOUS EEG (non-convulsive status detection). The integration paradigm: treat ICP + CPP + PbtO2 + metabolism TOGETHER — a normal ICP does NOT exclude ongoing brain ischaemia. KEY TRIALS: BTF 4th edition (Carney 2017), BEST:TRIP (Chesnut 2012 NEJM — ICP-guided care NOT superior to imaging-clinical exam in a Bolivian/Ecuadorian cohort, but monitoring is still standard of care in well-resourced settings), BOOST-2 (Okonkwo 2017 — PbtO2 + ICP monitoring reduced burden of brain hypoxia vs ICP alone, trend to better outcome — Phase III BOOST-3 ongoing).
Practise this topic
On this page
Study tools
Your progress
Saved on this device.
Target exams
Red flags
- P2 > P1 on the ICP waveform = EXHAUSTED intracranial compliance = intracranial hypertension is IMMINENT even if the numeric mean ICP is <22 — escalate now, do not wait for the number
- CPP <60 mmHg = cerebral ischaemia and secondary injury — calculate CPP (MAP − ICP) every time you read an ICP; a 'normal' ICP with a LOW MAP still gives a dangerous CPP
- ICP >40 mmHg = SEVERE intracranial hypertension with imminent herniation risk — this is a neurosurgical emergency: escalate osmotherapy, check for a surgical lesion, prepare for decompressive craniectomy
- ICP rises with NO change in waveform character + sudden loss of variability = CHECK THE SYSTEM (catheter blocked, transducer malpositioned, air in line) before treating a phantom number — over-treating an artefact causes harm
- PbtO2 <15 mmHg = brain tissue hypoxia — NOT all hypoxia is detected by ICP. A patient can have a normal ICP and a critically low PbtO2 (diffuse microvascular ischaemia) — treat the PbtO2, not just the pressure
Meet the patient
A ventilated severe-TBI patient has an ICP of 28 mmHg, a MAP of 76 mmHg, and a PbtO2 of 15 mmHg. The EVD transducer is levelled to the external auditory meatus, and the waveform shows P2 climbing through P1.[1]
The two questions that decide his next hour are the two that decide every intracranial hypertension case: is the pressure real, and is the brain perfused? (calculate the CPP — MAP minus ICP — and read the waveform) and is there a surgical lesion, or is the injury diffuse? (re-image). Treat the foundations first, escalate up the staircase, and never sacrifice tissue oxygen for a prettier ICP number.[1]
References20ShowHide
- [1]Carney N, Totten AM, O'Reilly C, et al. Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Fourth Edition Neurosurgery, 2017.PMID 27654000
- [2]Chesnut RM, Temkin N, Carney N, et al. A trial of intracranial-pressure monitoring in traumatic brain injury N Engl J Med, 2012.PMID 23234472
- [3]Okonkwo DO, Shutter LA, Moore C, et al. Brain Oxygen Optimization in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Phase-II: A Phase II Randomized Trial Crit Care Med, 2017.PMID 29028696
- [4]Stocchetti N, Zoerle T, Carbonara M. Intracranial pressure management in patients with traumatic brain injury: an update Curr Opin Crit Care, 2017.PMID 28157822
- [5]Le Roux P, Menon DK, Citerio G, et al. Consensus summary statement of the International Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference on Multimodality Monitoring in Neurocritical Care : a statement for healthcare professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Intensive Care Med, 2014.PMID 25138226
- [6]Chesnut RM, Temkin N, Dikmen S, et al. A Method of Managing Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in the Absence of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring: The Imaging and Clinical Examination Protocol J Neurotrauma, 2018.PMID 28726590
- [7]Hawryluk GWJ, Aguilera S, Buki A, et al. A management algorithm for patients with intracranial pressure monitoring: the Seattle International Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Consensus Conference (SIBICC) Intensive Care Med, 2019.PMID 31659383
- [8]Stein KY, Froese L, Gomez A, et al. Intracranial Pressure Monitoring and Treatment Thresholds in Acute Neural Injury: A Narrative Review of the Historical Achievements, Current State, and Future Perspectives Neurotrauma Rep, 2023.PMID 37636334
- [9]Hutchinson PJ, Kolias AG, Timofeev IS, et al. Trial of Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Intracranial Hypertension N Engl J Med, 2016.PMID 27602507
- [10]Cooper DJ, Rosenfeld JV, Murray L, et al. Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury N Engl J Med, 2011.PMID 21434843
- [11]Seo H, Kim E, Jung H, et al. A prospective randomized trial of the optimal dose of mannitol for intraoperative brain relaxation in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial brain tumor resection J Neurosurg, 2017.PMID 27540904
- [12]Fink ME. Osmotherapy for intracranial hypertension: mannitol versus hypertonic saline Continuum (Minneap Minn), 2012.PMID 22810253
- [13]Tsaousi G, Stazi E, Cinicola M, et al. Cardiac output changes after osmotic therapy in neurosurgical and neurocritical care patients: a systematic review of the clinical literature Br J Clin Pharmacol, 2018.PMID 29247499
- [14]Blacker SN, Prabhakar H, Moreton EO, et al. Ventriculostomy-Related Infections by Country-Income Level: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Hierarchical Meta-analysis J Neurosurg Anesthesiol, 2026.PMID 42290525
- [15]Lozier AP, Sciacca RR, Romagnoli MF, et al. Ventriculostomy-related infections: a critical review of the literature Neurosurgery, 2002.PMID 12182415
- [16]Zweckberger K, Sakowitz OW, Unterberg AW, et al. [Intracranial pressure-volume relationship. Physiology and pathophysiology]. Anaesthesist, 2009.PMID 19384533
- [17]Schizodimos T, Soulountsi V, Iasonidou C, et al. An overview of management of intracranial hypertension in the intensive care unit J Anesth, 2020.PMID 32440802
- [18]Hutchinson PJ, Jalloh I, Helmy A, et al. Consensus statement from the 2014 International Microdialysis Forum Intensive Care Med, 2015.PMID 26194024
- [19]Zeiler FA, Thelin EP, Helmy A, et al. A systematic review of cerebral microdialysis and outcomes in TBI: relationships to patient functional outcome, neurophysiologic measures, and tissue outcome Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2017.PMID 28988334
- [20]Magnoni S, Tedesco C, Carbonara M, et al. Relationship between systemic glucose and cerebral glucose is preserved in patients with severe traumatic brain injury, but glucose delivery to the brain may become limited when oxidative metabolism is impaired: implications for glycemic control Crit Care Med, 2012.PMID 22610183