Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

ICU TopicsGI/Nutrition

ICU · GI/Nutrition

Acute pancreatitis: interventional management and complications

Also known as Pancreatic intervention · Endoscopic necrosectomy · Walled-off necrosis · Infected pancreatic necrosis step-up · PANTER trial · TENSION trial · Video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement · Lumen-apposing metal stent

Interventional management of severe acute pancreatitis is built on three pillars: (1) the STEP-UP approach for infected necrosis — drain first (percutaneous or endoscopic transluminal), add minimally invasive necrosectomy only if drainage fails, reserve open surgery for last resort; (2) TIMING — delay intervention ~4 weeks to allow demarcation and walling-off whenever possible (intervene earlier ONLY for clinical deterioration); (3) ROUTE — prefer endoscopic/percutaneous over open. PANTER trial (van Santvoort 2010, NEJM): step-up vs primary open necrosectomy — step-up superior (composite of major complications or death 40% vs 69%, RR 0.57; 35% treated with drainage alone). PANTER long-term follow-up (Hollemans 2019, mean 86 months): step-up had less exocrine and endocrine insufficiency, fewer incisional hernias, without increased risk of reinterventions. TENSION trial (van Brunschot 2018, Lancet): endoscopic step-up vs surgical step-up — no difference in the composite endpoint (43% vs 45%), but endoscopic had fewer fistulae and shorter hospital stay. PENGUIN trial (Bakker 2012, JAMA): endoscopic transluminal vs surgical necrosectomy — endoscopic fewer complications (20% vs 80%). Walled-off necrosis (over 4 wk, necrotic content) is NOT a pseudocyst (over 4 wk, fluid only) — management differs (WON needs necrosectomy/drainage, pseudocyst usually observed).

medium16 referencesUpdated 26 July 202615 min readVerification in progress

Practise this topic

  • 8 MCQs

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic8 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

CICMFFICMEDIC

Red flags

  • Do NOT surgically intervene for necrosis <4 weeks from onset — wait for demarcation
  • Infected necrosis: drain FIRST (percutaneous/endoscopic) — surgery only if drainage fails (step-up approach)
  • Persistent fever + deteriorating clinical status + gas in necrotic tissue = infected necrosis needing intervention
  • Pseudoaneurysm (splenic/gastroduodenal artery): life-threatening haemorrhage — urgent embolisation
  • Gas in a peripancreatic collection is NOT diagnostic of infection alone — confirm with positive FNA or clinical deterioration
  • Walled-off necrosis contains SOLID necrotic debris — a stent/drain alone often fails; necrosectomy (endoscopic or VARD) is usually required
  • LAMS left in situ >4 weeks risks buried stent, bleeding, and perforation — remove/replace on schedule
  • Do NOT confuse pseudocyst with WON — draining a WON like a pseudocyst (stent only, no necrosectomy) leads to blocked drains and recurrent sepsis
On this page
Study tools

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic8 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

CICMFFICMEDIC

Red flags

  • Do NOT surgically intervene for necrosis <4 weeks from onset — wait for demarcation
  • Infected necrosis: drain FIRST (percutaneous/endoscopic) — surgery only if drainage fails (step-up approach)
  • Persistent fever + deteriorating clinical status + gas in necrotic tissue = infected necrosis needing intervention
  • Pseudoaneurysm (splenic/gastroduodenal artery): life-threatening haemorrhage — urgent embolisation
  • Gas in a peripancreatic collection is NOT diagnostic of infection alone — confirm with positive FNA or clinical deterioration
  • Walled-off necrosis contains SOLID necrotic debris — a stent/drain alone often fails; necrosectomy (endoscopic or VARD) is usually required
  • LAMS left in situ >4 weeks risks buried stent, bleeding, and perforation — remove/replace on schedule
  • Do NOT confuse pseudocyst with WON — draining a WON like a pseudocyst (stent only, no necrosectomy) leads to blocked drains and recurrent sepsis
The one-line answer

Infected pancreatic necrosis is a step-up disease: drain first (percutaneous or endoscopic transluminal), add minimally invasive necrosectomy only if drainage fails, and reserve open surgery for last resort. Delay intervention about 4 weeks to let necrosis demarcate and wall off — intervene earlier only for clinical deterioration. Endoscopic beats surgical step-up (TENSION: fewer fistulae, shorter stay). PANTER (2010) cut the composite of major complications or death from 69 to 40 percent versus primary open necrosectomy (RR 0.57), and 35 percent were treated with drainage alone. Walled-off necrosis (over 4 weeks, solid debris) needs necrosectomy; a pseudocyst (fluid only) usually drains on a stent. A pseudoaneurysm is an embolisation, not a surgery.[1]

Meet the patient

A 45-year-old man with alcohol-induced necrotising pancreatitis is day 32 from onset. He has persistent fever, a lactate rising to 3.8, and a new noradrenaline requirement despite nine days of meropenem. The CT shows a 12 by 8 cm walled-off pancreatic necrosis with multiple gas locules, apposed to the posterior gastric wall. A retroperitoneal drain placed six days ago has minimal output, and he remains septic.[1]

The two questions that decide his next step are the two that decide every case of infected necrosis: has the collection walled off enough to intervene safely (around 4 weeks)? and is there an endoscopic window, or does this need a surgical route? Hold those two and the step-up ladder slots into place.[1]

ICU Fellowship (CICM) Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this topic. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the ICU Fellowship (CICM) fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References16ShowHide
  1. [1]van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Bakker OJ, et al. A step-up approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis N Engl J Med, 2010.PMID 20410514
  2. [2]Hollemans RA, Bakker OJ, Boermeester MA, et al. Superiority of Step-up Approach vs Open Necrosectomy in Long-term Follow-up of Patients With Necrotizing Pancreatitis Gastroenterology, 2019.PMID 30391468
  3. [3]van Brunschot S, van Grinsven J, van Santvoort HC, et al. Endoscopic or surgical step-up approach for infected necrotising pancreatitis: a multicentre randomised trial Lancet, 2018.PMID 29108721
  4. [4]van Brunschot S, van Grinsven J, Voermans RP, et al. Transluminal endoscopic step-up approach versus minimally invasive surgical step-up approach in patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis (TENSION trial): design and rationale of a randomised controlled multicenter trial [ISRCTN09186711] BMC Gastroenterol, 2013.PMID 24274589
  5. [5]Bakker OJ, van Santvoort HC, van Brunschot S, et al. Endoscopic transgastric vs surgical necrosectomy for infected necrotizing pancreatitis: a randomized trial JAMA, 2012.PMID 22416101
  6. [6]Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus Gut, 2013.PMID 23100216
  7. [7]Sarr MG, Banks PA, Bollen TL, et al. The new revised classification of acute pancreatitis 2012 Surg Clin North Am, 2013.PMID 23632143
  8. [8]Zhu HY, Xie P, Song YX, et al. Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) versus plastic stents for EUS-guided drainage of walled-off necrosis (WON) (LVPWON): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial Trials, 2018.PMID 30305160
  9. [9]Chen YI, Barkun AN, Adam V, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing lumen-apposing metal stents with plastic stents in the management of pancreatic walled-off necrosis Gastrointest Endosc, 2018.PMID 29614262
  10. [10]Tenner S, Vege SS, Sheth SG, et al. American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines: Management of Acute Pancreatitis Am J Gastroenterol, 2024.PMID 38857482
  11. [11]Miura F, Okamoto K, Takada T, et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: initial management of acute biliary infection and flowchart for acute cholangitis J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2018.PMID 28941329
  12. [12]Kiriyama S, Kozaka K, Takada T, et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholangitis (with videos) J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2018.PMID 29032610
  13. [13]Elmunzer BJ, Scheiman JM, Lehman GA, et al. A randomized trial of rectal indomethacin to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis N Engl J Med, 2012.PMID 22494121
  14. [14]Dumonceau JM, Kapral C, Aabakken L, et al. ERCP-related adverse events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline Endoscopy, 2020.PMID 31863440
  15. [15]Fölsch UR, Nitsche R, Lüdtke R, et al. Early ERCP and papillotomy compared with conservative treatment for acute biliary pancreatitis N Engl J Med, 1997.PMID 8995085
  16. [16]Boxhoorn L, van Dijk SM, van Grinsven J, et al. Immediate versus Postponed Intervention for Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis N Engl J Med, 2021.PMID 34614330

Test yourself

Practise what you just read

  • 8 MCQs
ICU Fellowship (CICM) Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete ICU Fellowship (CICM) library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousAcute pancreatitis: ERAS and early enteral nutritionGI & nutritionNextAcute Severe Intra-Abdominal Infection and Peritonitis — Comprehensive (Primary/SBP, Secondary, Tertiary, Source Control, Open Abdomen)gi-nutrition