ICU · Ethics
End-of-life care and palliative care in the ICU
Also known as End-of-life care · Palliative care in ICU · Withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy (WLST) · Treatment limitation orders (TLO) · Comfort care · Goals-of-care conversation · Shared decision-making · Withholding vs withdrawing life-sustaining treatment
End-of-life care is a core ICU competency. In the ETHICUS study of 37 European ICUs, therapy was withheld before 38% and withdrawn before 33% of ICU deaths or treatment limitations. Principles: (1) shared decision-making with patient/surrogate/multidisciplinary team grounded in the four ethical principles — autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, (2) clear communication about prognosis and goals using a structured framework (SPIKES for bad news, Ask-Tell-Ask for goals), (3) treatment limitation orders (TLO) that specify what treatments are and are not appropriate, (4) symptom-focused comfort care. CRUCIAL ETHICAL PRINCIPLE: withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment are ETHICALLY EQUIVALENT — there is no moral difference between not starting and stopping a treatment that cannot benefit the patient.
Practise this topic
On this page
Study tools
Your progress
Saved on this device.
Target exams
Red flags
- Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy are ETHICALLY EQUIVALENT — many clinicians wrongly perceive withdrawal as worse; it is NOT
- Treatment limitation orders must be documented clearly and communicated to ALL team members
- WLST is NOT euthanasia — it is allowing natural death from underlying disease by removing medical interventions that are no longer beneficial
- Always assess decision-making capacity directly — capacity is decision-specific, task-specific, and may fluctuate; never assume incapacity from age, intubation, or diagnosis alone
- Sedation/analgesia during WLST is titrated to COMFORT, not death — the doctrine of double effect justifies proportionate analgesia even if a foreseen (unintended) consequence is respiratory depression
- Always discuss organ donation AFTER the WLST decision, SEPARATELY, and by a TRAINED REQUESTOR — never couple donation consent with the EOL decision
- Give pre-emptive analgesia/sedation BEFORE withdrawing support — never withdraw first then chase symptoms
- Futile treatment against surrogate wishes: escalate to ethics committee / courts — do not unilaterally withdraw without due process
Meet the patient
A 78-year-old retired teacher, seventy-two hours after an out-of-hospital arrest with a twenty-five-minute downtime. Sedation has been off for two days; he is GCS 4 with preserved brainstem reflexes, and the MRI shows extensive cortical and deep grey diffusion restriction. His wife holds a signed advance directive refusing life-sustaining treatment when meaningful recovery is unlikely.[1]
The question that decides the next hour is not whether he is dying — he is — but whether the ventilator is still serving him or merely postponing a death he has already said he would not want. That single question, asked well, is the whole of end-of-life care in the ICU.[1]
References12ShowHide
- [1]Truog RD, Campbell ML, Curtis JR, et al. Recommendations for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: a consensus statement by the American College [corrected] of Critical Care Medicine Crit Care Med, 2008.PMID 18431285
- [2]Tanaka Gutiez M, Efstathiou N, Innes R, et al. End-of-life care in the intensive care unit Anaesthesia, 2023.PMID 36633479
- [3]Cortegiani A, Ippolito M, Mercadante S End-of-life Care in the Intensive Care Unit and Ethics of Withholding/Withdrawal of Life-sustaining Treatments Anesthesiol Clin, 2024.PMID 39054016
- [4]Baile WF, Buckman R, Lenzi R, et al. SPIKES-A six-step protocol for delivering bad news: application to the patient with cancer Oncologist, 2000.PMID 10964998
- [5]Appelbaum PS Clinical practice. Assessment of patients' competence to consent to treatment N Engl J Med, 2007.PMID 17978292
- [6]Kon AA, Davidson JE, Morrison W, et al. Shared Decision-Making in Intensive Care Units. Executive Summary of the American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society Policy Statement Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2016.PMID 27097019
- [7]Sprung CL, Cohen SL, Sjokvist P, et al. End-of-life practices in European intensive care units: the Ethicus Study JAMA, 2003.PMID 12915432
- [8]Lautrette A, Darmon M, Megarbane B, et al. A communication strategy and brochure for relatives of patients dying in the ICU N Engl J Med, 2007.PMID 17267907
- [9]Chan JD, Treece PD, Engelberg RA, et al. Narcotic and benzodiazepine use after withdrawal of life support: association with time to death? Chest, 2004.PMID 15249473
- [10]Likar R, Rupacher E, Kager H, et al. [Efficacy of glycopyrronium bromide and scopolamine hydrobromide in patients with death rattle: a randomized controlled study]. Wien Klin Wochenschr, 2008.PMID 19116709
- [11]Bosslet GT, Pope TM, Rubenfeld GD, et al. An Official ATS/AACN/ACCP/ESICM/SCCM Policy Statement: Responding to Requests for Potentially Inappropriate Treatments in Intensive Care Units Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2015.PMID 25978438
- [12]El Badaoui S, Singovski S, Hentsch L, et al. [Death rattle : what is the appropriate management ?]. Rev Med Suisse, 2025.PMID 41376311