ICU · Monitoring / ultrasound
Shock Echocardiography — RUSH & FALLS Protocols
Also known as RUSH protocol · Rapid Ultrasound in Shock · FALLS protocol · Fluid Administration Limited by Lung Sonography · Shock ultrasound · Pump tank pipes · Bedside shock protocol
The RUSH protocol (Rapid Ultrasound in Shock) is a systematic bedside ultrasound exam for the shocked patient that integrates cardiac, lung, abdominal, and vascular ultrasound to determine the type of shock. It examines three things — the PUMP (the heart: LV function, RV dilatation, effusion), the TANK (the volume: IVC, lungs, FAST), and the PIPES (the vessels: aorta, DVT, pneumothorax). The findings map to the four shock types: hypovolaemic (hyperdynamic LV, empty IVC), cardiogenic (hypokinetic LV, B-lines), obstructive (RV dilated or effusion, DVT or pneumothorax), and distributive (hyperdynamic, empty IVC, dry lungs). The FALLS protocol (Lichtenstein) uses lung ultrasound to guide fluid resuscitation — give fluid until A-lines convert to B-lines (the tank is full), then stop.
Practise this topic
On this page
Study tools
Your progress
Saved on this device.
Target exams
Red flags
- An A-profile (dry lungs) with an empty IVC in shock is NOT always hypovolaemia — a massive PE and a tension pneumothorax both give A-lines; always check the heart (RV dilatation) and lung sliding before giving fluid
- FALLS does NOT detect tamponade, tension pneumothorax or PE directly — run the obstructive-shock checklist (heart, lung sliding, DVT) BEFORE starting FALLS fluid resuscitation
- A plethoric non-collapsing IVC in a shocked ventilated patient may be the ventilator (high intrathoracic pressure) or right-heart failure, not volume overload — interpret the IVC in context
- B-lines in the dependent zones are normal in the supine ventilated patient; the FALLS endpoint is NEW, diffuse, anterior B-lines appearing during the fluid challenge
- Lung sliding is abolished bilaterally by apnoea, main-stem intubation (one side) and severe bullous disease — do not call a pneumothorax without a lung point in a stable patient
- A hyperdynamic LV does NOT exclude cardiogenic shock — septic cardiomyopathy and stress cardiomyopathy (Takotsubo) can be hyperkinetic with a global low output; trust the lactate, SvO2 and the lungs
Meet the patient
A 68-year-old man arrives confused and cold, BP 78/45, MAP 56, lactate 4.8, capillary refill 5 seconds. The history is thin and the differential is everything — a bleed, sepsis, pump failure, a clot in the lung, a tamponade. The stethoscope and the blood gas will not separate these in the next five minutes; the probe will.[1]
You place the subcostal cardiac view, sweep to the IVC, check Morison's, the aorta, and the anterior pleura. In three to five minutes the RUSH exam names the shock and points at the action — fluid, inotrope, drain, decompress, or lyse. Everything below is the detail behind that five-minute scan.[1]
References10ShowHide
- [1]Perera P, Mailhot T, Riley D, Mandavia D The RUSH exam: Rapid Ultrasound in SHock in the evaluation of the critically lll Emerg Med Clin North Am, 2010.PMID 19945597
- [2]Lichtenstein DA Fluid administration limited by lung sonography: the place of lung ultrasound in assessment of acute circulatory failure (the FALLS-protocol) Expert Rev Respir Med, 2012.PMID 22455488
- [3]Lichtenstein DA, Mezière GA Relevance of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute respiratory failure: the BLUE protocol Chest, 2008.PMID 18403664
- [4]Volpicelli G, Elbarbary M, Blaivas M, et al. International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound Intensive Care Med, 2012.PMID 22392031
- [5]Latsios G, Sanidas E, Velliou M, et al. The Role of Point-of-care Ultrasound in Cardiac Arrest; A Narrative Review Arch Acad Emerg Med, 2025.PMID 41031210
- [6]Jones AE, Tayal VS, Sullivan DM, Kline JA Randomized, controlled trial of immediate versus delayed goal-directed ultrasound to identify the cause of nontraumatic hypotension in emergency department patients Crit Care Med, 2004.PMID 15286547
- [7]Barbier C, Loubières Y, Schmit C, et al. Respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter are helpful in predicting fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients Intensive Care Med, 2004.PMID 15034650
- [8]Rudski LG, Lai WW, Afilalo J, et al. Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2010.PMID 20620859
- [9]Lichtenstein DA, Mezière GA, Lagoueyte JF, et al. A-lines and B-lines: lung ultrasound as a bedside tool for predicting pulmonary artery occlusion pressure in the critically ill Chest, 2009.PMID 19809049
- [10]Konstantinides S, Geibel A, Heusel G, et al. Heparin plus alteplase compared with heparin alone in patients with submassive pulmonary embolism N Engl J Med, 2002.PMID 12374874