Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

ICU TopicsCardiovascular / ACS

ICU · Cardiovascular / ACS

Acute Coronary Syndromes (STEMI/NSTEMI) in the ICU

Also known as Acute coronary syndrome · ACS · STEMI · NSTEMI · Unstable angina · Primary PCI · Dual antiplatelet therapy · DAPT · Ticagrelor · PLATO trial · SHOCK trial · GRACE score

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) span the spectrum of acute myocardial ischaemia — unstable angina (UA), NSTEMI and STEMI — now unified under the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (Thygesen 2018, Circulation), which classifies MI into five pathophysiological types (spontaneous, supply-demand, sudden death, PCI-related and CABG-related). STEMI (complete coronary occlusion) is treated with primary PCI within 90 minutes or thrombolysis within 30 minutes; NSTEMI is risk-stratified by the GRACE score for early invasive PCI within 24 hours. All ACS receives aspirin plus a P2Y12 inhibitor (ticagrelor preferred per PLATO, NEJM 2009) plus parenteral anticoagulation (heparin or bivalirudin per HORIZONS-AMI). In MI complicated by cardiogenic shock, early revascularisation is the standard (SHOCK, NEJM 1999); routine IABP confers no mortality benefit (IABP-SHOCK II, NEJM 2012), culprit-only PCI beats multivessel PCI in shock (CULPRIT-SHOCK, NEJM 2017), and early routine VA-ECMO did not improve outcomes (ECLS-SHOCK, NEJM 2023). The mechanical complications of MI — VSD, papillary muscle rupture and free wall rupture — classically occur at days 2 to 7 and present with sudden haemodynamic collapse.

high26 referencesUpdated 19 Aug 202623 min readVerification in progress

Practise this topic

  • 8 MCQs

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic8 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

CICMFFICMEDIC

Red flags

  • The mechanical complications of MI (VSD, papillary muscle rupture, free wall rupture) occur at days 2 to 7 — a sudden collapse in this window is mechanical until proven otherwise; get an urgent echo
  • Early revascularisation is the standard in MI with cardiogenic shock (SHOCK trial) — do not delay PCI for medical stabilisation
  • IABP-SHOCK II: no mortality benefit of routine IABP in ACS cardiogenic shock — use selectively, not routinely
  • CULPRIT-SHOCK: culprit-only PCI is superior to immediate multivessel PCI in cardiogenic shock
  • ECLS-SHOCK: early routine VA-ECMO did not improve outcomes in AMI-cardiogenic shock (use individualised, not routine)
  • Ticagrelor preferred over clopidogrel in ACS (PLATO) — but avoid in prior intracranial haemorrhage or active bleeding
  • Prasugrel is contraindicated in prior stroke/TIA and cautioned in age >75 and weight <60 kg (TRITON-TIMI 38)
  • Type 2 MI (supply-demand mismatch) is NOT a plaque rupture — treat the trigger (tachyarrhythmia, sepsis, hypoxia), not with routine dual antiplatelet therapy
  • Right ventricular infarction: avoid nitrates and preload-reducing agents, maintain RV preload, give fluid and inotrope
On this page
Study tools

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic8 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

CICMFFICMEDIC

Red flags

  • The mechanical complications of MI (VSD, papillary muscle rupture, free wall rupture) occur at days 2 to 7 — a sudden collapse in this window is mechanical until proven otherwise; get an urgent echo
  • Early revascularisation is the standard in MI with cardiogenic shock (SHOCK trial) — do not delay PCI for medical stabilisation
  • IABP-SHOCK II: no mortality benefit of routine IABP in ACS cardiogenic shock — use selectively, not routinely
  • CULPRIT-SHOCK: culprit-only PCI is superior to immediate multivessel PCI in cardiogenic shock
  • ECLS-SHOCK: early routine VA-ECMO did not improve outcomes in AMI-cardiogenic shock (use individualised, not routine)
  • Ticagrelor preferred over clopidogrel in ACS (PLATO) — but avoid in prior intracranial haemorrhage or active bleeding
  • Prasugrel is contraindicated in prior stroke/TIA and cautioned in age >75 and weight <60 kg (TRITON-TIMI 38)
  • Type 2 MI (supply-demand mismatch) is NOT a plaque rupture — treat the trigger (tachyarrhythmia, sepsis, hypoxia), not with routine dual antiplatelet therapy
  • Right ventricular infarction: avoid nitrates and preload-reducing agents, maintain RV preload, give fluid and inotrope
The one-paragraph fellowship answer

ACS in the ICU is one disease — an unstable atherosclerotic plaque — wearing three masks the ECG and troponin prise apart: STEMI (ST elevation, complete occlusion, reperfuse now), NSTEMI (troponin positive, no ST elevation, risk-stratify with the GRACE score) and unstable angina (no troponin rise). Every patient gets aspirin plus a P2Y12 inhibitor (ticagrelor preferred per PLATO) plus parenteral anticoagulation (heparin or bivalirudin per HORIZONS-AMI); STEMI goes to primary PCI within 90 minutes or thrombolysis within 30. The ICU job is the complications, and the SHOCK trial is the spine — in MI with cardiogenic shock, early revascularisation within 24 hours is the standard, do not delay for medical stabilisation. Culprit-only PCI beats multivessel in shock (CULPRIT-SHOCK); routine IABP and routine VA-ECMO add nothing (IABP-SHOCK II, ECLS-SHOCK). Watch for the mechanical complications at days 2 to 7, keep the RV filled in inferior infarction, and treat a Type 2 MI by fixing the trigger, not loading DAPT.[1]

Meet the patient

A 62-year-old smoker is admitted overnight after primary PCI for an anterior STEMI — door-to-balloon 78 minutes, a drug-eluting stent to the proximal LAD, ticagrelor loaded, heparin running. He looks comfortable on the morning round: sinus rhythm, mild T-wave inversions, no pain, making urine.[15]

The question that will define his ICU stay is not whether the artery opened — it did. It is whether the next four days go quietly, or whether day four brings a new murmur, flash pulmonary oedema and a crash call. Hold that question and the whole of ACS in the ICU slots into place.[1]

ICU Fellowship (CICM) Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this topic. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the ICU Fellowship (CICM) fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References26ShowHide
  1. [1]Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, et al. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock N Engl J Med, 1999.PMID 10460813
  2. [2]Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes N Engl J Med, 2009.PMID 19717846
  3. [3]Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann FJ, et al. Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock N Engl J Med, 2012.PMID 22920912
  4. [4]Thiele H, Akin I, Sandri M, et al. PCI Strategies in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock N Engl J Med, 2017.PMID 29083953
  5. [5]Thiele H, Zeymer U, Akin I, et al. Extracorporeal Life Support in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock N Engl J Med, 2023.PMID 37634145
  6. [6]Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes N Engl J Med, 2007.PMID 17982182
  7. [7]Stone GW, Witzenbichler B, Guagliumi G, et al. Bivalirudin during primary PCI in acute myocardial infarction N Engl J Med, 2008.PMID 18499566
  8. [8]Schüpke S, Neumann FJ, Menichelli M, et al. Ticagrelor or Prasugrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes N Engl J Med, 2019.PMID 31475799
  9. [9]Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018) Circulation, 2018.PMID 30571511
  10. [10]Engstrøm T, Kelbæk H, Helqvist S, et al. Complete revascularisation versus treatment of the culprit lesion only in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease (DANAMI-3—PRIMULTI): an open-label, randomised controlled trial Lancet, 2015.PMID 26347918
  11. [11]Mehta SR, Wood DA, Storey RF, et al. Complete Revascularization with Multivessel PCI for Myocardial Infarction N Engl J Med, 2019.PMID 31475795
  12. [12]Mega JL, Braunwald E, Wiviott SD, et al. Rivaroxaban in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome N Engl J Med, 2012.PMID 22077192
  13. [13]Bonaca MP, Bhatt DL, Cohen M, et al. Long-term use of ticagrelor in patients with prior myocardial infarction N Engl J Med, 2015.PMID 25773268
  14. [14]Collet JP, Thiele H, Barbato E, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation Eur Heart J, 2021.PMID 32860058
  15. [15]Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Eur Heart J, 2018.PMID 28886621
  16. [16]Kubica J, Adamski P, Ostrowska M, et al. Morphine delays and attenuates ticagrelor exposure and action in patients with myocardial infarction: the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled IMPRESSION trial Eur Heart J, 2016.PMID 26491112
  17. [17]Stub D, Smith K, Bernard S, et al. Air Versus Oxygen in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Circulation, 2015.PMID 26002889
  18. [18]Hofmann R, James SK, Jernberg T, et al. Oxygen Therapy in Suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction N Engl J Med, 2017.PMID 28844200
  19. [19]Yusuf S, Mehta SR, Chrolavicius S, et al. Comparison of fondaparinux and enoxaparin in acute coronary syndromes N Engl J Med, 2006.PMID 16537663
  20. [20]Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, et al. Early revascularization and long-term survival in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction JAMA, 2006.PMID 16757723
  21. [21]Gong FF, Vaitenas I, Malaisrie SC, et al. Mechanical Complications of Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Review JAMA Cardiol, 2021.PMID 33295949
  22. [22]Kakouros N, Cokkinos DV Right ventricular myocardial infarction: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management Postgrad Med J, 2010.PMID 20956396
  23. [23]Wilkinson-Stokes M, Betson J, Sawyer S Adverse events from nitrate administration during right ventricular myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis Emerg Med J, 2023.PMID 36180168
  24. [24]Pitt B, Remme W, Zannad F, et al. Eplerenone, a selective aldosterone blocker, in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction N Engl J Med, 2003.PMID 12668699
  25. [25]Cannon CP, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, et al. Intensive versus moderate lipid lowering with statins after acute coronary syndromes N Engl J Med, 2004.PMID 15007110
  26. [26]Adler Y, Charron P, Imazio M, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Pericardial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Endorsed by: The European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) Eur Heart J, 2015.PMID 26320112

Test yourself

Practise what you just read

  • 8 MCQs
ICU Fellowship (CICM) Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete ICU Fellowship (CICM) library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousPeritonitis in ICU: spontaneous bacterial, secondary, and tertiaryGastroenterologyNextAcute Decompression Illness — Comprehensive ICU Management (Diving Emergencies)environmental