ICU · Cardiovascular / ACS
Acute Coronary Syndromes (STEMI/NSTEMI) in the ICU
Also known as Acute coronary syndrome · ACS · STEMI · NSTEMI · Unstable angina · Primary PCI · Dual antiplatelet therapy · DAPT · Ticagrelor · PLATO trial · SHOCK trial · GRACE score
Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) span the spectrum of acute myocardial ischaemia — unstable angina (UA), NSTEMI and STEMI — now unified under the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (Thygesen 2018, Circulation), which classifies MI into five pathophysiological types (spontaneous, supply-demand, sudden death, PCI-related and CABG-related). STEMI (complete coronary occlusion) is treated with primary PCI within 90 minutes or thrombolysis within 30 minutes; NSTEMI is risk-stratified by the GRACE score for early invasive PCI within 24 hours. All ACS receives aspirin plus a P2Y12 inhibitor (ticagrelor preferred per PLATO, NEJM 2009) plus parenteral anticoagulation (heparin or bivalirudin per HORIZONS-AMI). In MI complicated by cardiogenic shock, early revascularisation is the standard (SHOCK, NEJM 1999); routine IABP confers no mortality benefit (IABP-SHOCK II, NEJM 2012), culprit-only PCI beats multivessel PCI in shock (CULPRIT-SHOCK, NEJM 2017), and early routine VA-ECMO did not improve outcomes (ECLS-SHOCK, NEJM 2023). The mechanical complications of MI — VSD, papillary muscle rupture and free wall rupture — classically occur at days 2 to 7 and present with sudden haemodynamic collapse.
Practise this topic
On this page
Study tools
Your progress
Saved on this device.
Target exams
Red flags
- The mechanical complications of MI (VSD, papillary muscle rupture, free wall rupture) occur at days 2 to 7 — a sudden collapse in this window is mechanical until proven otherwise; get an urgent echo
- Early revascularisation is the standard in MI with cardiogenic shock (SHOCK trial) — do not delay PCI for medical stabilisation
- IABP-SHOCK II: no mortality benefit of routine IABP in ACS cardiogenic shock — use selectively, not routinely
- CULPRIT-SHOCK: culprit-only PCI is superior to immediate multivessel PCI in cardiogenic shock
- ECLS-SHOCK: early routine VA-ECMO did not improve outcomes in AMI-cardiogenic shock (use individualised, not routine)
- Ticagrelor preferred over clopidogrel in ACS (PLATO) — but avoid in prior intracranial haemorrhage or active bleeding
- Prasugrel is contraindicated in prior stroke/TIA and cautioned in age >75 and weight <60 kg (TRITON-TIMI 38)
- Type 2 MI (supply-demand mismatch) is NOT a plaque rupture — treat the trigger (tachyarrhythmia, sepsis, hypoxia), not with routine dual antiplatelet therapy
- Right ventricular infarction: avoid nitrates and preload-reducing agents, maintain RV preload, give fluid and inotrope
Meet the patient
A 62-year-old smoker is admitted overnight after primary PCI for an anterior STEMI — door-to-balloon 78 minutes, a drug-eluting stent to the proximal LAD, ticagrelor loaded, heparin running. He looks comfortable on the morning round: sinus rhythm, mild T-wave inversions, no pain, making urine.[15]
The question that will define his ICU stay is not whether the artery opened — it did. It is whether the next four days go quietly, or whether day four brings a new murmur, flash pulmonary oedema and a crash call. Hold that question and the whole of ACS in the ICU slots into place.[1]
References26ShowHide
- [1]Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, et al. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock N Engl J Med, 1999.PMID 10460813
- [2]Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes N Engl J Med, 2009.PMID 19717846
- [3]Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann FJ, et al. Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock N Engl J Med, 2012.PMID 22920912
- [4]Thiele H, Akin I, Sandri M, et al. PCI Strategies in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock N Engl J Med, 2017.PMID 29083953
- [5]Thiele H, Zeymer U, Akin I, et al. Extracorporeal Life Support in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock N Engl J Med, 2023.PMID 37634145
- [6]Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes N Engl J Med, 2007.PMID 17982182
- [7]Stone GW, Witzenbichler B, Guagliumi G, et al. Bivalirudin during primary PCI in acute myocardial infarction N Engl J Med, 2008.PMID 18499566
- [8]Schüpke S, Neumann FJ, Menichelli M, et al. Ticagrelor or Prasugrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes N Engl J Med, 2019.PMID 31475799
- [9]Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018) Circulation, 2018.PMID 30571511
- [10]Engstrøm T, Kelbæk H, Helqvist S, et al. Complete revascularisation versus treatment of the culprit lesion only in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease (DANAMI-3—PRIMULTI): an open-label, randomised controlled trial Lancet, 2015.PMID 26347918
- [11]Mehta SR, Wood DA, Storey RF, et al. Complete Revascularization with Multivessel PCI for Myocardial Infarction N Engl J Med, 2019.PMID 31475795
- [12]Mega JL, Braunwald E, Wiviott SD, et al. Rivaroxaban in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome N Engl J Med, 2012.PMID 22077192
- [13]Bonaca MP, Bhatt DL, Cohen M, et al. Long-term use of ticagrelor in patients with prior myocardial infarction N Engl J Med, 2015.PMID 25773268
- [14]Collet JP, Thiele H, Barbato E, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation Eur Heart J, 2021.PMID 32860058
- [15]Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Eur Heart J, 2018.PMID 28886621
- [16]Kubica J, Adamski P, Ostrowska M, et al. Morphine delays and attenuates ticagrelor exposure and action in patients with myocardial infarction: the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled IMPRESSION trial Eur Heart J, 2016.PMID 26491112
- [17]Stub D, Smith K, Bernard S, et al. Air Versus Oxygen in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Circulation, 2015.PMID 26002889
- [18]Hofmann R, James SK, Jernberg T, et al. Oxygen Therapy in Suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction N Engl J Med, 2017.PMID 28844200
- [19]Yusuf S, Mehta SR, Chrolavicius S, et al. Comparison of fondaparinux and enoxaparin in acute coronary syndromes N Engl J Med, 2006.PMID 16537663
- [20]Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, et al. Early revascularization and long-term survival in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction JAMA, 2006.PMID 16757723
- [21]Gong FF, Vaitenas I, Malaisrie SC, et al. Mechanical Complications of Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Review JAMA Cardiol, 2021.PMID 33295949
- [22]Kakouros N, Cokkinos DV Right ventricular myocardial infarction: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management Postgrad Med J, 2010.PMID 20956396
- [23]Wilkinson-Stokes M, Betson J, Sawyer S Adverse events from nitrate administration during right ventricular myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis Emerg Med J, 2023.PMID 36180168
- [24]Pitt B, Remme W, Zannad F, et al. Eplerenone, a selective aldosterone blocker, in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction N Engl J Med, 2003.PMID 12668699
- [25]Cannon CP, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, et al. Intensive versus moderate lipid lowering with statins after acute coronary syndromes N Engl J Med, 2004.PMID 15007110
- [26]Adler Y, Charron P, Imazio M, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Pericardial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Endorsed by: The European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) Eur Heart J, 2015.PMID 26320112