Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Gen Surg Vivastrauma

Gen Surg Vivas · trauma

Bleeding neck with stridor — balloon, signs, CTA boundary, carotid repair and the gullet that needs scoping

Fellowship viva on penetrating neck trauma: unstable bleeding control with Foley bridge, hard-sign limits, no-zone CTA selection, carotid repair hierarchy, aerodigestive scope doctrine.

clinical1 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

FRACSFRCS(Gen Surg)ABSFRCSC
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

FRACSFRCS(Gen Surg)ABSFRCSC
Prompt
A 34-year-old man with a zone I stab arrives with active bleeding, an expanding haematoma, stridor, systolic 88, and crepitus. A second candidate vignette: his brother with a zone II stab is stable with dysphagia and a small haematoma. Talk me through the unstable-versus-stable split, the balloon bridge, the hard-sign accuracy fence, when CTA may still help stable hard-sign disease, the carotid repair-versus-ligation choice with numbers, and the gullet sequence that CTA alone never closes.

Write your answer

Saved on this device. No marking — you are the marker.

Examiner route

  • Unstable split: active bleeding with expanding haematoma, stridor, and shock goes straight to theatre — patients whose condition is unstable undergo immediate operative exploration, with no international consensus to hide behind.[33]
  • Balloon bridge: compress then Foley — delayed failure 7% against 26% with pressure, mortality 5% against 23% in combat bleeders — then blood and theatre, with 6 of 8 civilian unstable successes as the civilian anchor.[30]
  • Signs fence: hard signs are specific but insensitive (55.4% sensitive, 88.1% specific for major injury across 310 patients at 29.7% prevalence) — and in 232 vascular injuries 19% of hard-sign patients needed no operation — so hard selects but never compels blindly.[9][8]
  • No-zone frame: the neck is evaluated as a unit rather than by external zones, sparing negatives — because only 59.1% of internal injuries share the wound zone.[10]
  • CTA boundary: stable soft-sign disease earns CTA (89.5 to 100% sensitive); even stable hard-sign zone II disease earned CTA in 23 patients with 17 unnecessary explorations prevented at one false-negative haematoma — quoted as selection, not delay of the unstable.[2][29]
  • Carotid choice: repair or revascularize except the devastated comatose; ligation is 100% poor (5 deficits, 4 deaths in 9) against 30% with restoration — so restore flow, stent the inaccessible, ligate almost never.[11][15]
  • Gullet close: CTA alone is insufficient with 19% of oesophageal injuries missed — scope or swallow every concerning gullet, because delay drives sepsis.[3]

Pass standard

Controls the unstable bleeder with balloon-to-theatre without imaging, fences hard signs with 55.4/88.1 accuracy and the 19% no-operation caveat, applies no-zone CTA selection to the stable by zone-discordance 59.1% and CTA 89.5 to 100% including the narrow stable-hard exception (17 prevented, one false-negative), restores rather than ligates the carotid, and scopes every concerning gullet after CTA.[30][9][8][1][10][2][29][11][15][3]

References11ShowHide
  1. [1]Siletz A, Inaba K Diagnostic approach to penetrating neck trauma: What you need to know. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2024.PMID 38523116
  2. [2]Ibraheem K, Wong S, Smith A, et al. Computed tomography angiography in the "no-zone" approach era for penetrating neck trauma: A systematic review. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2020.PMID 32890346
  3. [3]Paladino L, Baron BJ, Shan G, et al. Computed tomography angiography for aerodigestive injuries in penetrating neck trauma: A systematic review. Acad Emerg Med, 2021.PMID 34021515
  4. [8]Marrotte A, Calvo RY, Badiee J, et al. Reading the signs in penetrating cervical vascular injuries: Analysis of hard/soft signs and initial management from a nationwide vascular trauma database. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2022.PMID 35545805
  5. [9]Barrientos ML, Zapata CAL, Toro DAM, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and predictive value of hard signs for operative or endovascular management and major injury in penetrating neck trauma: a single-centre retrospective cohort study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg, 2026.PMID 42752941
  6. [10]Madsen AS, Bruce JL, Oosthuizen GV, et al. Correlation between the level of the external wound and the internal injury in penetrating neck injury does not favour an initial zonal management approach. BJS Open, 2020.PMID 32525254
  7. [11]Byerly S, Stuber J, Patel D, et al. The Acute Management of Penetrating Carotid Artery Injuries: A Systematic Review. Ann Vasc Surg, 2025.PMID 39864509
  8. [15]Reva VA, Pronchenko AA, Samokhvalov IM Operative management of penetrating carotid artery injuries. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2011.PMID 21388840
  9. [29]Schroll R, Fontenot T, Lipcsey M, et al. Role of computed tomography angiography in the management of Zone II penetrating neck trauma in patients with clinical hard signs. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2015.PMID 26317813
  10. [30]Weppner J Improved mortality from penetrating neck and maxillofacial trauma using Foley catheter balloon tamponade in combat. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2013.PMID 23823611
  11. [33]Nowicki JL, Stew B, Ooi E Penetrating neck injuries: a guide to evaluation and management. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 2018.PMID 29046084
PreviousATLS primary survey — the unstable blunt polytrauma patienttraumaNextExsanguinating polytrauma listed for damage control — abbreviation, ratios, clock, packs, closuretrauma