Gen Surg Vivas · trauma
ATLS primary survey — the unstable blunt polytrauma patient
Fellowship viva on the full primary survey of the unstable blunt polytrauma patient: needle decompression evidence, pelvic binder honesty, the REBOA evidence inversion, and the HOTT response to deterioration.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
Write your answer
Saved on this device. No marking — you are the marker.
Interpretation
Reveal interpretationShowHide
The survey itself. Parallel and goal-oriented, not serial: with a team, airway with cervical spine protection, breathing, circulation with haemorrhage control, disability and exposure run simultaneously, with defined endpoints for airway management, access and haemodynamic parameters.[1] The reduced air entry with hypoxia and hypotension is tension physiology until excluded — treat, don't image.
Needle decompression — say the numbers. Immediate needle decompression followed by an intercostal drain. The 2025 meta-analysis pooled 24 studies and 8,046 patients: a 32.84% failure rate, failure falling 7.76% per centimetre of needle length, a 7 cm needle appropriate at the 5th midaxillary or 2nd midclavicular site, and — because this is the left side — the 2nd midclavicular line is preferred given cardiac injury risk at the left lateral sites. Then I reassess: a failed needle means finger thoracostomy and a tube, not patience.[2]
The pelvis — mechanical control with honest evidence. A binder goes on now; WSES grounds pelvic management in haemodynamic status, ring anatomy and associated injuries, multidisciplinary from the start.[3] But I volunteer the weakness: the 2025 systematic review found no clear superiority of early binder application for mortality (17.4% vs 15.7%), transfusion, pain or complications.[4]
If he arrests — HOTT, then the REBOA conversation. Traumatic cardiac arrest is managed by immediate, simultaneous treatment of reversible causes: hypovolaemia, oxygenation, tension pneumothorax, tamponade — HOTT.[7] On REBOA I narrate the inversion: observational meta-analysis favoured it over thoracotomy, but the UK-REBOA randomised trial found higher 90-day mortality with REBOA (54% vs 42%; OR 1.58), and EAST's 2025 guideline conditionally recommends against REBOA for haemodynamically unstable patients with suspected subdiaphragmatic haemorrhage — while conditionally recommending it precisely here, in arrest from subdiaphragmatic bleeding.[5][6]
Key points
References7ShowHide
- [1]Gondek S, Schroeder ME, Sarani B Assessment and Resuscitation in Trauma Management. Surg Clin North Am, 2017.PMID 28958368
- [2]Ahmad SJS, Degiannis JR, Head M, Ahmed AR Meta-analysis of the optimal needle length and decompression site for tension pneumothorax and consensus recommendations on current ATLS and ETC guidelines. World J Emerg Surg, 2025.PMID 40383767
- [3]Coccolini F, Stahel PF, Montori G, Biffl W, et al. Pelvic trauma: WSES classification and guidelines. World J Emerg Surg, 2017.PMID 28115984
- [4]Papaleontiou A, Poupard AM, Parker P Are pelvic binders an effective measure to lower mortality and decrease blood loss after high energy pelvic ring injuries? A systematic review. Surgeon, 2025.PMID 40957825
- [5]Jansen JO, Hudson J, Kennedy C, Cochran C, et al. The UK resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in trauma patients with life-threatening torso haemorrhage: the (UK-REBOA) multicentre RCT. Health Technol Assess, 2024.PMID 39259521
- [6]Harfouche MN, Bugaev N, Como JJ, Fraser DR, et al. Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta in surgical and trauma patients: a systematic review, meta-analysis and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open, 2025.PMID 40166770
- [7]Carenzo L, Calgaro G, Rehn M, Perkins Z, et al. Contemporary management of traumatic cardiac arrest and peri-arrest states: a narrative review. J Anesth Analg Crit Care, 2024.PMID 39327636