Gen Surg Vivas · trauma
Shock with a shattered ring — bind, transfuse, pack the venous bleed, plug the blush on a clock
Fellowship viva on unstable vertical-shear pelvic fracture with shock: binder-first resuscitation, venous-versus-arterial logic, pack-versus-plug equipoise with timing, REBOA equipoise, urethral-injury sequencing, WSES/Tile counsel and geriatric vigilance.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
FRACSFRCS(Gen Surg)ABSFRCSC
Prompt
A 58-year-old woman crushed between two vehicles arrives with systolic 82, heart rate 128, a clinically unstable pelvis, FAST negative, and a pelvic film suggesting vertical shear. She has blood at the urethral meatus. The interventional suite says 90 minutes to ready; theatre is ready now. Talk me through the binder, the transfusion posture, the packing-versus-embolisation-versus-REBOA choice with numbers, the urological sequencing, the classification you will quote, and what changes at her age.
Write your answer
Saved on this device. No marking — you are the marker.
Examiner route
- Opening (binder + blood): the candidate must bind immediately — ATLS standard yet delivered to only 47% of unstable fractures — with simultaneous blood and products inside an algorithmic pathway of the kind that cut mortality from 20% to 7.7%.[14][15]
- Bleeding logic: venous and bony bleeding is the majority, so packing is the unstable-despite-red-cells operation; embolisation remains the arterial mainstay — and with 90 minutes to the suite against a ready theatre, the candidate must pack now and plan embolisation for the blush, since a quarter of packed patients need subsequent embolisation anyway.[12][5][7]
- Clock pressure: the candidate must quote the timing curve — 0% dead at 0 to 30 minutes rising to 17.0% adjusted at 150 to 180 — and the system confession that median time to angiography runs 286 minutes, to justify transfer and parallel-preparation decisions.[4][5]
- REBOA fence: EAST shows no overall benefit with a pelvic harm signal (OR 2.15), so the candidate may offer it only as a bridge to packing, never as the plan.[3]
- Urology sequencing: blood at the meatus with an unstable ring means retrograde urethrogram before any catheter — LUTI incidence 7.7%, confined to unstable patterns.[21]
- Counsel and age: Tile C vertical shear with shock carries 58% mortality (19% overall, 42% with shock); management stays physio-plus-anatomy per WSES; at 58, transfusion need is 2.8-fold with higher death at the same ISS, so thresholds drop.[23][1][17]
Pass standard
Binds before imaging, packs the unstable now rather than waiting 90 minutes, embolises the blush on a clock, fences REBOA honestly, images the urethra before catheterising, counsels Tile C shock at 58%, and adjusts for age with the transfusion multiplier.[14][12][4][3][21][23][17]
References11ShowHide
- [1]Coccolini F, Stahel PF, Montori G, et al. Pelvic trauma: WSES classification and guidelines. World J Emerg Surg, 2017.PMID 28115984
- [3]Harfouche MN, Bugaev N, Como JJ, et al. Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta in surgical and trauma patients: a systematic review, meta-analysis and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open, 2025.PMID 40166770
- [4]Aoki M, Abe T, Matsumoto S, et al. Delayed embolization associated with increased mortality in pelvic fracture with hemodynamic stability at hospital arrival. World J Emerg Surg, 2021.PMID 33941216
- [5]Tesoriero RB, Bruns BR, Narayan M, et al. Angiographic embolization for hemorrhage following pelvic fracture: Is it time for a paradigm shift? J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2017.PMID 27602911
- [7]McDonogh JM, Lewis DP, Tarrant SM, et al. Preperitoneal packing versus angioembolization for the initial management of hemodynamically unstable pelvic fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2022.PMID 34991126
- [12]Burlew CC Preperitoneal pelvic packing for exsanguinating pelvic fractures. Int Orthop, 2017.PMID 28447123
- [14]Vaidya R, Roth M, Zarling B, et al. Application of Circumferential Compression Device (Binder) in Pelvic Injuries: Room for Improvement. West J Emerg Med, 2016.PMID 27833687
- [15]Fitzgerald M, Esser M, Russ M, et al. Pelvic trauma mortality reduced by integrated trauma care. Emerg Med Australas, 2017.PMID 28616867
- [17]Henry SM, Pollak AN, Jones AL, et al. Pelvic fracture in geriatric patients: a distinct clinical entity. J Trauma, 2002.PMID 12131383
- [21]Zhao X, Lu S, Wang B, et al. Fracture Types Influence the Likelihood of Lower Urinary Tract Injuries in Patients with Pelvic Fractures. J Clin Med, 2023.PMID 37109301
- [23]Caillot M, Hammad E, Le Baron M, et al. Pelvic fracture in multiple trauma: A 67-case series. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2016.PMID 27863917