Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Gen Surg SAQstrauma

Gen Surg SAQs · trauma

Blown-pupil subdural with contusion — flap choice, TXA timing, pressure ladder and 24-month counsel

Fellowship SAQ on surgical traumatic brain injury: ASDH flap decision, TXA timing, ICP ladder, seizure/VTE cover, 24-month counsel.

10 marks12 min1 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

FRACSFRCS(Gen Surg)ABSFRCSC
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

FRACSFRCS(Gen Surg)ABSFRCSC
Prompt
A 24-year-old motorcyclist arrives intubated with a fixed dilated right pupil, a right convexity acute subdural haematoma with 8 mm midline shift, and a frontal contusion. (A) State your evacuation-versus-conservative reasoning with the TRACK-TBI equipoise numbers and your craniotomy-versus-craniectomy decision with the RESCUE-ASDH numbers. (4 marks) (B) State your tranexamic acid regimen with the CRASH-3 numbers and timing rule, and your ICP monitoring and tiered rescue plan with the BEST-TRIP/SIBICC/RESCUEicp thresholds. (3 marks) (C) State your seizure and VTE prophylaxis with the Temkin/early-VTE numbers, and your family counsel with the 24-month survival-with-disability breakdown. (3 marks)

Write your answer

Saved on this device. No marking — you are the marker.

Model answer

  • Evacuate: blown pupil with 8 mm shift and coma is mass effect with deterioration — a true neurosurgical emergency, not an equipoise case.[13]
  • Equipoise boundary: where the surgeon genuinely hesitates, centre preference for acute surgery (0-86% of cases) changes nothing (OR 1.05), so conservative care with delayed-surgery safety net (12% convert) is defensible.[13]
  • Flap: RESCUE-ASDH (450 randomised) found no functional difference (common OR 0.85, null) with deaths 30.2 vs 32.2% — replace the flap unless intraoperative swelling forbids it; craniotomy risks re-operation, craniectomy risks wound failure.[5]
  • TXA: 1 g over 10 min then 1 g over 8 h within 3 h (CRASH-3: head-injury death 18.5 vs 19.8%, mild-moderate RR 0.78, vessels neutral) — optimal within 2 h or with GCS below 9.[18][19]
  • Pressure: monitor the severe brain (BEST-TRIP ICP-at-or-below-20 protocol equals imaging-exam care, so the number informs rather than commands); climb SIBICC tiers 10-4-3; rescue doorway is sustained pressure above 25 for 1-12 h despite therapy.[9][7][2]
  • Seizure: phenytoin load within 24 h for 7 days — week-1 seizures 3.6 vs 14.2% (RR 0.27), no late effect (Cochrane late RR 0.91) — then stop.[29][30]
  • VTE: pharmacologic prophylaxis within 72 h on a stable 24-h scan — early beats late (OR 0.46) with no safety difference.[37]
  • Counsel: per 100 rescue operations, 21 extra alive at 24 months — 4 vegetative, 9 severely disabled, 8 moderately disabled, none extra fully recovered — with a third of surgical survivors still improving between 6 and 24 months.[3]
References11ShowHide
  1. [2]Hutchinson PJ, Kolias AG, Timofeev IS, et al. Trial of Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Intracranial Hypertension. N Engl J Med, 2016.PMID 27602507
  2. [3]Kolias AG, Adams H, Timofeev IS, et al. Evaluation of Outcomes Among Patients With Traumatic Intracranial Hypertension Treated With Decompressive Craniectomy vs Standard Medical Care at 24 Months: A Secondary Analysis of the RESCUEicp Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol, 2022.PMID 35666526
  3. [5]Hutchinson P, Mee H, Adams H, et al. Decompressive craniectomy versus craniotomy for patients undergoing surgical evacuation of an acute subdural hematoma: RESCUE-ASDH RCT and cost effectiveness. Health Technol Assess, 2026.PMID 42663405
  4. [7]Hawryluk GWJ, Aguilera S, Buki A, et al. A management algorithm for patients with intracranial pressure monitoring: the Seattle International Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Consensus Conference (SIBICC). Intensive Care Med, 2019.PMID 31659383
  5. [9]Chesnut RM, Temkin N, Carney N, et al. A trial of intracranial-pressure monitoring in traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med, 2012.PMID 23234472
  6. [13]Van Essen TA, Yue JK, Barber J, et al. Acute Surgery vs Conservative Treatment for Traumatic Acute Subdural Hematoma. JAMA Netw Open, 2025.PMID 41042512
  7. [18]CRASH-3 trial collaborators. Effects of tranexamic acid on death, disability, vascular occlusive events and other morbidities in patients with acute traumatic brain injury (CRASH-3): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet, 2019.PMID 31623894
  8. [19]Osawa I, Goto T, Roberts I Tranexamic acid for trauma: optimal timing of administration based on the CRASH-2 and CRASH-3 trials. Br J Surg, 2025.PMID 40277024
  9. [29]Temkin NR, Dikmen SS, Wilensky AJ, et al. A randomized, double-blind study of phenytoin for the prevention of post-traumatic seizures. N Engl J Med, 1990.PMID 2115976
  10. [30]Thompson K, Pohlmann-Eden B, Campbell LA, et al. Pharmacological treatments for preventing epilepsy following traumatic head injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2015.PMID 26259048
  11. [37]Mesa Galan LA, Egea-Guerrero JJ, Quintana Diaz M, et al. The effectiveness and safety of pharmacological prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2016.PMID 27244574
PreviousBelted blunt trauma with free fluid and an equivocal bowel scan — seat-belt reading, FAST/CT limits, scores, child rules and antibiotic stoptraumaNextExsanguinating blunt polytrauma with liver and destructive colon injury — abbreviate, resuscitate, pack, time the returntrauma