Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Gen Surg SAQstrauma

Gen Surg SAQs · trauma

Exsanguinating blunt polytrauma with liver and destructive colon injury — abbreviate, resuscitate, pack, time the return

Fellowship SAQ on damage control: DCS-versus-DCR definition with phases, admission predictor panel, PROPPR ratios and TXA windows, packing timing, colon stage-1 rules, traction closure hierarchy, SLEEP-TIME clock, matched open-abdomen harm and age-stratified outcomes.

10 marks12 min2 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

FRACSFRCS(Gen Surg)ABSFRCSC
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

FRACSFRCS(Gen Surg)ABSFRCSC
Prompt
A 34-year-old man after blunt polytrauma arrives with systolic pressure 82 mm Hg, heart rate 135, positive FAST, lactate 6.8 mmol/L, temperature 34.8°C and INR 1.3. Laparotomy reveals a grade IV right-lobe liver injury with coagulopathic bleeding and a destructive sigmoid colon injury with faecal contamination. (A) Define damage control surgery versus damage control resuscitation with the phase sequence, justify abbreviation using the admission predictor panel, and state your DCR and tranexamic acid plan with trial windows. (4 marks) (B) State your liver-packing and bowel plan with removal timing, and choose your temporary closure with closure-rate numbers. (3 marks) (C) State your re-look and fascial-closure timing with the closure-odds data, argue when an open abdomen is unjustified using matched evidence, and counsel on age-stratified survival. (3 marks)

Write your answer

Saved on this device. No marking — you are the marker.

Model answer

(A) Abbreviate by physiology, resuscitate by ratio and clock (4 marks). Damage control surgery is abbreviated laparotomy prioritising short-term physiological recovery over anatomical reconstruction — three steps (abbreviated operation, ICU restoration, planned definitive repair), extended to six phases with DCR as phase 0 — while DCR is hypotensive resuscitation with early blood products that may let borderline patients avoid DCS entirely.[3][5][1] He meets the damage-control admission panel: hypotension, tachycardia, positive FAST, lactate above 6, temperature below 35 — against independent early-mortality predictors of INR above 1.2, base deficit above 3, head AIS 3 or more, temperature below 35, lactate above 6 and haemoglobin below 7, from a cohort where 16.3 percent died early with lactate 5.81 versus 3.46 separating early deaths from survivors.[13] Run balanced products toward empiric 1:1:1 per EAST (protocol OR 0.61, high plasma OR 0.60, high platelets OR 0.44), accepting PROPPR's honesty — no mortality difference, fewer exsanguinations (9.2 versus 14.6 percent), more haemostasis (86 versus 78 percent).[25][24] Give TXA now as 1 g over 10 minutes then 1 g over 8 hours: within-1-hour treatment cut bleeding death (RR 0.68), 1-to-3-hour helped (RR 0.79), beyond 3 hours seemed harmful (RR 1.44) — with benefit concentrated inside 90 minutes to 2 hours.[26][27]

(B) Pack the liver, divert or delay the colon, close with traction (3 marks). Pack for coagulopathic liver bleeding — packing controlled 18 of 22 complex injuries definitively — and remove packs between 36 and 72 hours with first re-look after 48 hours: 24-hour removal rebled more than 48-hour, and under-36-hour removal rebled 21 versus 4 percent with equal complications.[42][40][41] For the destructive sigmoid injury, never anastomose at stage 1: delayed anastomosis at re-look leaked in 25 percent with significantly higher mortality when leak occurred, while diversion matched on overall and colon-related mortality — staple and leave discontinuous, divert or delay in the selected.[48] Close temporarily with vacuum plus fascial traction, not Bogotá bag: traction-plus-vacuum led vacuum alone by 35 points for definitive closure in the RCT-only meta-analysis, mesh-mediated traction closed 73 versus 54.9 percent and cut failed-closure odds ten-fold in Finland.[53][51][49]

(C) Return within 24 hours, close at the earliest honest moment, quote the harms (3 marks). Readiness is lactate normalisation (10 percent dead inside 24-hour normalisation, 67 percent when never normalised), but the closure odds decay per takeback: 92.9 percent fascial closure at 61 hours, minus 91.5 percent odds per extra re-laparotomy, first takeback within 24 hours — so return early and make the definitive operation definitive.[21][50] An open abdomen that could have been closed is a complication: matched peritonitis data showed more complications (71.2 versus 41.4 percent), higher mortality (22.5 versus 11.7 percent) and longer stay with open abdomen — with overnight and operator variation proving the decision is system-dependent.[65] Counsel by age honestly: over-55 damage-control mortality 29.4 versus 4.8 percent (laparotomy 55.6 versus 7.1) yet most elderly survived with comparable morbidity — intervene, do not presume futility.[68]

References19ShowHide
  1. [1]Weber DG, Bendinelli C, Balogh ZJ Damage control surgery for abdominal emergencies. Br J Surg, 2014.PMID 24273018
  2. [3]Lamb CM, MacGoey P, Navarro AP, et al. Damage control surgery in the era of damage control resuscitation. Br J Anaesth, 2014.PMID 25038156
  3. [5]Parreira JG, Soldá S, Rasslan S [Damage control: a tactical alternative for the management of exanguinating trauma patients]. Arq Gastroenterol, 2002.PMID 12778312
  4. [13]Frischknecht A, Lustenberger T, Bukur M, et al. Damage control in severely injured trauma patients - A ten-year experience. J Emerg Trauma Shock, 2011.PMID 22090736
  5. [21]Husain FA, Martin MJ, Mullenix PS, et al. Serum lactate and base deficit as predictors of mortality and morbidity. Am J Surg, 2003.PMID 12727572
  6. [24]Holcomb JB, Tilley BC, Baraniuk S, et al. Transfusion of plasma, platelets, and red blood cells in a 1:1:1 vs a 1:1:2 ratio and mortality in patients with severe trauma: the PROPPR randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 2015.PMID 25647203
  7. [25]Cannon JW, Khan MA, Raja AS, et al. Damage control resuscitation in patients with severe traumatic hemorrhage: A practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2017.PMID 28225743
  8. [26]Shakur H, Roberts I, Bautista R, et al. Effects of tranexamic acid on death, vascular occlusive events, and blood transfusion in trauma patients with significant haemorrhage (CRASH-2): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet, 2010.PMID 20554319
  9. [27]Roberts I, Shakur H, Afolabi A, et al. The importance of early treatment with tranexamic acid in bleeding trauma patients: an exploratory analysis of the CRASH-2 randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2011.PMID 21439633
  10. [40]Nicol AJ, Hommes M, Primrose R, et al. Packing for control of hemorrhage in major liver trauma. World J Surg, 2007.PMID 17334868
  11. [41]Caruso DM, Battistella FD, Owings JT, et al. Perihepatic packing of major liver injuries: complications and mortality. Arch Surg, 1999.PMID 10487590
  12. [42]Krige JE, Bornman PC, Terblanche J Therapeutic perihepatic packing in complex liver trauma. Br J Surg, 1992.PMID 1737272
  13. [48]Oosthuizen G, Buitendag J, Variawa S, et al. Penetrating colonic trauma and damage control surgery: Anastomosis or stoma? ANZ J Surg, 2021.PMID 34056835
  14. [49]Rasilainen S, Mentula P, Salminen P, et al. Superior primary fascial closure rate and lower mortality after open abdomen using negative pressure wound therapy with continuous fascial traction. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2020.PMID 32701909
  15. [50]Kwon E, Krause C, Luo-Owen X, et al. Time is domain: factors affecting primary fascial closure after trauma and non-trauma damage control laparotomy (data from the EAST SLEEP-TIME multicenter registry). Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg, 2022.PMID 34845499
  16. [51]Pillay P, Smith MTD, Bruce JL, et al. The Efficacy of VAMMFT Compared to 'Bogota Bag' in Achieving Sheath Closure Following Temporary Abdominal Closure at Index Laparotomy for Trauma. World J Surg, 2023.PMID 36995399
  17. [53]Cristaudo A, Jennings S, Gunnarsson R, et al. Complications and Mortality Associated with Temporary Abdominal Closure Techniques: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am Surg, 2017.PMID 28228207
  18. [65]Kao AM, Cetrulo LN, Baimas-George MR, et al. Outcomes of open abdomen versus primary closure following emergent laparotomy for suspected secondary peritonitis: A propensity-matched analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2019.PMID 31045736
  19. [68]Lustenberger T, Talving P, Schnüriger B, et al. Impact of advanced age on outcomes following damage control interventions for trauma. World J Surg, 2012.PMID 22037692
PreviousBlown-pupil subdural with contusion — flap choice, TXA timing, pressure ladder and 24-month counseltraumaNextFlail chest with contusion on the ventilator and an occult pneumothorax — EAST doctrine, fixation trials, observation consent and rib analgesiatrauma