Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Gen Surg SAQssurgical-critical-care

Gen Surg SAQs · surgical-critical-care

Shock after trauma laparotomy — classify the category, defend the fluids, start the right pressor

Fellowship SAQ on surgical shock: four-category classification, EGDT-to-usual-care fluids reasoning, norepinephrine-first pressors, 1:1:1 transfusion, TXA timing gradient and the TBI saline exception.

10 marks12 min2 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

FRACSFRCS(Gen Surg)ABSFRCSC
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

FRACSFRCS(Gen Surg)ABSFRCSC
Prompt
A 58-year-old man is 4 hours after damage-control laparotomy for a stab wound with packing in situ. Blood pressure 88/54 mmHg, heart rate 118/min, cold peripheries, lactate 4.2 mmol/L, urine 15 mL/h, Hb 82 g/L. He has received 2 L balanced crystalloid. (A) Classify the shock with the defining features and state what else you must still exclude. (3 marks) (B) Defend your next fluid, pressor and blood moves with trial numbers. (4 marks) (C) Give the tranexamic-acid decision with timing numbers and the TBI fluid caveat you would apply if he also had a head injury. (3 marks)

Write your answer

Saved on this device. No marking — you are the marker.

Model answer

(A) Hypovolaemic (haemorrhagic) shock — with obstructive and cardiogenic causes still to exclude (3 marks). Four categories share one mismatch — oxygen supply versus demand — and this is the blood-and-fluids compartment: intravascular volume loss from bleeding, treated by fluid replacement with balanced crystalloids and blood.[1] Cold peripheries, tachycardia, hypotension, oliguria and lactate 4.2 with Hb 82 after laparotomy fit absolute loss, not relative redistribution. Still exclude tamponade/tension physiology (distended veins, muffled sounds, unilateral silence — obstructive shock needs immediate life-saving intervention, never fluids-and-wait) and pump failure before attributing everything to blood loss.[1]

(B) Fluids as tested challenges, norepinephrine first, blood by ratio (4 marks). Continue balanced crystalloid as reassessed challenges with dynamic responsiveness testing — static preload markers are repeatedly unreliable, fluids often give no benefit, and excess harms lungs and kidneys; use cardiac-output/stroke-volume changes from postural manoeuvres or mini-challenges before each bolus.[10][15] Do not chase protocolised venous numbers: PRISM individual data (3,723 patients) found EGDT no better than usual care (24.9% versus 25.4%, odds ratio 0.97) with more ICU days and higher costs.[14] Start norepinephrine early to MAP 65+ rather than dopamine: SOAP II arrhythmia 24.1% versus 12.4% with dopamine, and meta-analysis gives mortality relative risk 0.89 with number needed to treat 9.[22][23] Transfuse 1:1:1 plasma:platelets:red cells — PROPPR showed no 24-hour mortality difference (12.7% versus 17.0%) but less exsanguination death (9.2% versus 14.6%) with more haemostasis and no extra complications.[29]

(C) TXA now, and saline if a head injury coexists (3 marks). Give tranexamic acid 1 g over 10 minutes then 1 g over 8 hours immediately — CRASH-2 (20,211 patients) cut all-cause death (14.5% versus 16.0%, relative risk 0.91) and bleeding death (4.9% versus 5.7%).[30] Timing decides direction: ≤1 hour relative risk 0.68, 1-to-3 hours 0.79, after 3 hours 1.44 harm — at 4 hours post-injury he is outside benefit, so document why TXA is withheld rather than giving it late.[31] If he also had traumatic brain injury, resuscitate with saline not balanced: BEST-Living TBI deaths 19.1% versus 14.7% (odds ratio 1.424) with ESICM conditionally recommending saline over balanced in TBI.[18][19]

References11ShowHide
  1. [1]Standl T, Annecke T, Cascorbi I, et al. The Nomenclature, Definition and Distinction of Types of Shock. Dtsch Arztebl Int, 2018.PMID 30573009
  2. [10]Monnet X, Teboul JL Prediction of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients. Ann Transl Med, 2020.PMID 32647715
  3. [14]Rowan KM, Angus DC, Bailey M, Barnato AE, et al. Early, Goal-Directed Therapy for Septic Shock - A Patient-Level Meta-Analysis. N Engl J Med, 2017.PMID 28320242
  4. [15]Semler MW, Self WH, Wanderer JP, et al. Balanced Crystalloids versus Saline in Critically Ill Adults. N Engl J Med, 2018.PMID 29485925
  5. [22]De Backer D, Biston P, Devriendt J, et al. Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock. N Engl J Med, 2010.PMID 20200382
  6. [23]Avni T, Lador A, Lev S, Leibovici L, et al. Vasopressors for the Treatment of Septic Shock: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One, 2015.PMID 26237037
  7. [29]Holcomb JB, Tilley BC, Baraniuk S, et al. Transfusion of plasma, platelets, and red blood cells in a 1:1:1 vs a 1:1:2 ratio and mortality in patients with severe trauma: the PROPPR randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 2015.PMID 25647203
  8. [30]Shakur H, Roberts I, Bautista R, Caballero J, et al. Effects of tranexamic acid on death, vascular occlusive events, and blood transfusion in trauma patients with significant haemorrhage (CRASH-2): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet, 2010.PMID 20554319
  9. [31]Roberts I, Shakur H, Afolabi A, Brohi K, et al. The importance of early treatment with tranexamic acid in bleeding trauma patients: an exploratory analysis of the CRASH-2 randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2011.PMID 21439633
  10. [18]Zampieri FG, Cavalcanti AB, Di Tanna GL, et al. Balanced crystalloids versus saline for critically ill patients (BEST-Living): a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. Lancet Respir Med, 2024.PMID 38043564
  11. [19]Arabi YM, Belley-Cote E, Carsetti A, et al. European Society of Intensive Care Medicine clinical practice guideline on fluid therapy in adult critically ill patients. Part 1: the choice of resuscitation fluids. Intensive Care Med, 2024.PMID 38771364
PreviousPostoperative sepsis — POD-5 fever after anterior resection: leak hunt, CRP timing, and the urgent source-control clocksurgical-critical-careNextATLS primary survey — tranexamic acid and the exsanguinating patienttrauma