Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Gen Surg SAQstrauma

Gen Surg SAQs · trauma

ATLS primary survey — tranexamic acid and the exsanguinating patient

Fellowship SAQ on catastrophic haemorrhage control in the primary survey: tourniquet judgement, CRASH-2 tranexamic acid with its timing analysis, PROPPR ratios and prehospital blood.

10 marks12 min2 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

FRACSFRCS(Gen Surg)ABSFRCSC
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

FRACSFRCS(Gen Surg)ABSFRCSC
Prompt
A 27-year-old man arrives 40 minutes after a high-speed motorcycle crash with a deformed, bleeding thigh, BP 84/48, HR 132, GCS 13. (A) Outline your immediate haemorrhage control sequence, including where a tourniquet does and does not belong. (B) Discuss the evidence for tranexamic acid, including the regimen and the timing analysis. (C) Justify your fluid and blood-product strategy, quoting one result each from PROPPR and the prehospital transfusion literature. (10 marks)

Write your answer

Saved on this device. No marking — you are the marker.

Model answer

Reveal model answerShowHide

(A) Haemorrhage control sequence (3 marks). Catastrophic external haemorrhage precedes airway — the <C>ABC reordering — so I control the thigh bleeding first while the team runs the rest of the survey in parallel. Direct pressure, then a tourniquet for life-threatening extremity bleeding that pressure cannot control. Tourniquets are lifesaving but not a default: in a civilian prehospital series of 211 placements, 63.2% had no other intervention attempted first, nearly a third of limbs arrived with palpable distal pulses, and fewer than half had arterial bleeding on release.[2] The Russo-Ukrainian war shows the harm of the reflex: unnecessary loss of extremities and life-threatening prolonged tourniquet application syndrome from non-indicated tourniquets combined with long evacuation.[1] So: indicated, applied tight, timed, and reassessed.

(B) Tranexamic acid (4 marks). CRASH-2 randomised 20,211 adults with, or at risk of, significant bleeding, within 8 hours of injury, to TXA 1 g over 10 minutes then 1 g over 8 hours or placebo. All-cause mortality fell from 16.0% to 14.5% (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85–0.97) and death due to bleeding from 5.7% to 4.9% (RR 0.85).[3] The timing analysis is the quotable part: within 1 hour RR 0.68 for death from bleeding; between 1 and 3 hours RR 0.79; after 3 hours RR 1.44 — treatment seemed to increase death from bleeding (4.4% vs 3.1%).[4] He is 40 minutes post-injury: give it now, and I state the window explicitly.

(C) Fluid and blood (3 marks). Blood, not crystalloid. PROPPR randomised 680 patients predicted to need massive transfusion to 1:1:1 versus 1:1:2 plasma:platelets:red cells: overall mortality did not differ significantly, but exsanguination in the first 24 hours fell with 1:1:1 (9.2% vs 14.6%) and more patients achieved haemostasis (86% vs 78%).[5] Prehospital transfusion has military cohort support: in the Afghan MEDEVAC cohort, prehospital blood recipients had 24-hour mortality 5% versus 19% and 30-day mortality 11% versus 23% in non-recipients.[6] My endpoints are control of the bleeding source plus goal-directed resuscitation, not a normal blood pressure.

Common errors

Forgetting that catastrophic haemorrhage precedes airway; quoting CRASH-2's headline without the timing analysis; inventing the dose; claiming PROPPR proved a mortality benefit it did not find; and treating the tourniquet as an unqualified good without the overuse data. [1][2][4][5]

Examiner notes

The discriminating answers quote the RR 1.44 late-treatment harm unprompted and can say why a tourniquet can be wrong, not just when it is right. Bonus marks for naming <C>ABC as a physiology-driven reordering rather than a competing dogma.[4][1]

References6ShowHide
  1. [1]Butler F, Holcomb JB, Dorlac W, Gurney J, et al. Who needs a tourniquet? And who does not? Lessons learned from a review of tourniquet use in the Russo-Ukrainian war. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2024.PMID 38996420
  2. [2]Gushing J, Blair SG, Albrecht RM, Sawar Z, et al. Prehospital tourniquet placement in extremity trauma. Am J Surg, 2023.PMID 37596184
  3. [3]Shakur H, Roberts I, Bautista R, et al. Effects of tranexamic acid on death, vascular occlusive events, and blood transfusion in trauma patients with significant haemorrhage (CRASH-2): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet, 2010.PMID 20554319
  4. [4]Roberts I, Shakur H, Afolabi A, et al. The importance of early treatment with tranexamic acid in bleeding trauma patients: an exploratory analysis of the CRASH-2 randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2011.PMID 21439633
  5. [5]Holcomb JB, Tilley BC, Baraniuk S, Fox EE, et al. Transfusion of plasma, platelets, and red blood cells in a 1:1:1 vs a 1:1:2 ratio and mortality in patients with severe trauma: the PROPPR randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 2015.PMID 25647203
  6. [6]Shackelford SA, Del Junco DJ, Powell-Dunford N, Mazuchowski EL, et al. Association of Prehospital Blood Product Transfusion During Medical Evacuation of Combat Casualties in Afghanistan With Acute and 30-Day Survival. JAMA, 2017.PMID 29067429
PreviousShock after trauma laparotomy — classify the category, defend the fluids, start the right pressorsurgical-critical-careNextBelted blunt trauma with free fluid and an equivocal bowel scan — seat-belt reading, FAST/CT limits, scores, child rules and antibiotic stoptrauma