Gen Surg SAQs · vascular
Wells-gated diagnosis with PERC and D-dimer honesty, DOAC-duration arithmetic, and filter-plus-lysis restraint
Fellowship SAQ on surgical VTE diagnosis with rule-out honesty, DOAC-era treatment with provoked-versus-unprovoked duration, and filter plus PE-reperfusion restraint.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
Write your answer
Saved on this device. No marking — you are the marker.
Model answer
(A) Gates with honesty (3 marks). Give Wells DVT: 593 patients with 16% prevalence; low/moderate/high carry 3/17/75% with 0.6% events in ruled-out patients — venography needed in only 5.6% with serial testing in 28%.[1] Give duplex: proximal sensitivity 94.2% with specificity 93.8% (duplex 96.5/94.0) but distal only 63.5% (56.8% compression alone), with repeat yield 1.3%.[3] Give PERC: all eight criteria (age under 50, pulse under 100, saturations 95%+, no haemoptysis, no oestrogen, no recent surgery/trauma admission, no prior VTE, no unilateral swelling) with 20% qualifying, 1.0% false-negatives and 97.4% sensitivity.[5] Give the D-dimer honesty: prevalence quadruples above 4000 ng per mL, above 2000 with an unlikely score gives 36% (a likely-group number), and above 4000 prevalence is very high independent of score.[6]
(B) Regimens with duration (4 marks). Give rivaroxaban: 15 mg twice daily for 3 weeks then 20 mg daily with 2.1 versus 3.0% (HR 0.68) and continued-treatment 1.3 versus 7.1% (HR 0.18).[13] Give apixaban: 10 mg twice daily for 7 days then 5 mg twice daily with 2.3 versus 2.7% (RR 0.84) and major bleeding 0.6 versus 1.8%.[15] Give dabigatran: 9-day parenteral lead-in then 150 mg twice daily with 2.4 versus 2.1% (HR 1.10).[16] Set duration: the colectomy woman is provoked surgical disease with 4-week enoxaparin cover (12.0 versus 4.8%) then duration-limited treatment;[8] the unprovoked woman extends — placebo recurs at 27.4% per patient-year versus 1.3% on warfarin — at conventional INR 2.0–3.0, since low intensity recurs at 1.9 versus 0.7 per 100 patient-years with identical bleeding.[17][18]
(C) Filters with lysis pricing (3 marks). Give PREPIC: day-12 PE 1.1 versus 4.8% traded for 2-year DVT 20.8 versus 11.6% with no mortality difference.[26] Give PREPIC2: retrievable filter plus anticoagulation gives 3-month recurrent PE 3.0 versus 1.5% (RR 2.00, ns) — no support in anticoagulable patients.[27] Give the lapse: real-world retrieval attempted in 25.3% at median 51 days — so filter the anticoagulation-contraindicated man with a retrieval date, never as treatment.[28] Price lysis: PEITHO prevents decompensation 2.6 versus 5.6% but strokes 2.4% with ten haemorrhagic and tied day-30 deaths;[30] ULTIMA catheter lysis drops RV-to-LV by 0.30 versus 0.03 with no major bleeding;[31] surgical embolectomy takes the contraindicated or shocked embolus at 6% operative mortality with 86% 1-year survival.[33]
References16ShowHide
- [1]Wells PS, et al. Value of assessment of pretest probability of deep-vein thrombosis in clinical management. Lancet, 1997.PMID 9428249
- [3]Goodacre S, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for deep vein thrombosis. BMC Med Imaging, 2005.PMID 16202135
- [5]Kline JA, et al. Prospective multicenter evaluation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria. J Thromb Haemost, 2008.PMID 18318689
- [6]Tick LW, et al. High D-dimer levels increase the likelihood of pulmonary embolism. J Intern Med, 2008.PMID 18452520
- [8]Bergqvist D, et al. Duration of prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism with enoxaparin after surgery for cancer. N Engl J Med, 2002.PMID 11919306
- [13]Bauersachs R, et al. Oral rivaroxaban for symptomatic venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med, 2010.PMID 21128814
- [15]Agnelli G, et al. Oral apixaban for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med, 2013.PMID 23808982
- [16]Schulman S, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med, 2009.PMID 19966341
- [17]Kearon C, et al. A comparison of three months of anticoagulation with extended anticoagulation for a first episode of idiopathic venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med, 1999.PMID 10089183
- [18]Kearon C, et al. Comparison of low-intensity warfarin therapy with conventional-intensity warfarin therapy for long-term prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med, 2003.PMID 12917299
- [26]Decousus H, et al. A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis. Prévention du Risque d'Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave Study Group. N Engl J Med, 1998.PMID 9459643
- [27]Mismetti P, et al. Effect of a retrievable inferior vena cava filter plus anticoagulation vs anticoagulation alone on risk of recurrent pulmonary embolism: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 2015.PMID 25919526
- [28]Mismetti P, et al. A prospective long-term study of 220 patients with a retrievable vena cava filter for secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism. Chest, 2007.PMID 17218580
- [30]Meyer G, et al. Fibrinolysis for patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med, 2014.PMID 24716681
- [31]Kucher N, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism. Circulation, 2014.PMID 24226805
- [33]Leacche M, et al. Modern surgical treatment of massive pulmonary embolism: results in 47 consecutive patients after rapid diagnosis and aggressive surgical approach. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2005.PMID 15867775