Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Gen Surg SAQsvascular

Gen Surg SAQs · vascular

Wells-gated diagnosis with PERC and D-dimer honesty, DOAC-duration arithmetic, and filter-plus-lysis restraint

Fellowship SAQ on surgical VTE diagnosis with rule-out honesty, DOAC-era treatment with provoked-versus-unprovoked duration, and filter plus PE-reperfusion restraint.

10 marks12 min2 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

FRACSFRCS(Gen Surg)ABSFRCSC
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

FRACSFRCS(Gen Surg)ABSFRCSC
Prompt
A 58-year-old woman is day 6 after open colectomy for cancer with a swollen left calf. A 34-year-old woman with a first unprovoked proximal DVT asks how long to take tablets. A breathless postoperative man has a contraindication to anticoagulation with right-ventricular strain on CT. (A) Give the Wells DVT bands with duplex accuracy, the PERC rule with its numbers, and the high-D-dimer honesty rule. (3 marks) (B) Give the four DOAC trial results with regimens, then set duration for each woman with the Kearon and ELATE numbers. (4 marks) (C) Give the PREPIC, PREPIC2 and retrieval-lapse numbers with the filter rule, then price PEITHO lysis against ULTIMA and surgical embolectomy. (3 marks)

Write your answer

Saved on this device. No marking — you are the marker.

Model answer

(A) Gates with honesty (3 marks). Give Wells DVT: 593 patients with 16% prevalence; low/moderate/high carry 3/17/75% with 0.6% events in ruled-out patients — venography needed in only 5.6% with serial testing in 28%.[1] Give duplex: proximal sensitivity 94.2% with specificity 93.8% (duplex 96.5/94.0) but distal only 63.5% (56.8% compression alone), with repeat yield 1.3%.[3] Give PERC: all eight criteria (age under 50, pulse under 100, saturations 95%+, no haemoptysis, no oestrogen, no recent surgery/trauma admission, no prior VTE, no unilateral swelling) with 20% qualifying, 1.0% false-negatives and 97.4% sensitivity.[5] Give the D-dimer honesty: prevalence quadruples above 4000 ng per mL, above 2000 with an unlikely score gives 36% (a likely-group number), and above 4000 prevalence is very high independent of score.[6]

(B) Regimens with duration (4 marks). Give rivaroxaban: 15 mg twice daily for 3 weeks then 20 mg daily with 2.1 versus 3.0% (HR 0.68) and continued-treatment 1.3 versus 7.1% (HR 0.18).[13] Give apixaban: 10 mg twice daily for 7 days then 5 mg twice daily with 2.3 versus 2.7% (RR 0.84) and major bleeding 0.6 versus 1.8%.[15] Give dabigatran: 9-day parenteral lead-in then 150 mg twice daily with 2.4 versus 2.1% (HR 1.10).[16] Set duration: the colectomy woman is provoked surgical disease with 4-week enoxaparin cover (12.0 versus 4.8%) then duration-limited treatment;[8] the unprovoked woman extends — placebo recurs at 27.4% per patient-year versus 1.3% on warfarin — at conventional INR 2.0–3.0, since low intensity recurs at 1.9 versus 0.7 per 100 patient-years with identical bleeding.[17][18]

(C) Filters with lysis pricing (3 marks). Give PREPIC: day-12 PE 1.1 versus 4.8% traded for 2-year DVT 20.8 versus 11.6% with no mortality difference.[26] Give PREPIC2: retrievable filter plus anticoagulation gives 3-month recurrent PE 3.0 versus 1.5% (RR 2.00, ns) — no support in anticoagulable patients.[27] Give the lapse: real-world retrieval attempted in 25.3% at median 51 days — so filter the anticoagulation-contraindicated man with a retrieval date, never as treatment.[28] Price lysis: PEITHO prevents decompensation 2.6 versus 5.6% but strokes 2.4% with ten haemorrhagic and tied day-30 deaths;[30] ULTIMA catheter lysis drops RV-to-LV by 0.30 versus 0.03 with no major bleeding;[31] surgical embolectomy takes the contraindicated or shocked embolus at 6% operative mortality with 86% 1-year survival.[33]

References16ShowHide
  1. [1]Wells PS, et al. Value of assessment of pretest probability of deep-vein thrombosis in clinical management. Lancet, 1997.PMID 9428249
  2. [3]Goodacre S, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for deep vein thrombosis. BMC Med Imaging, 2005.PMID 16202135
  3. [5]Kline JA, et al. Prospective multicenter evaluation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria. J Thromb Haemost, 2008.PMID 18318689
  4. [6]Tick LW, et al. High D-dimer levels increase the likelihood of pulmonary embolism. J Intern Med, 2008.PMID 18452520
  5. [8]Bergqvist D, et al. Duration of prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism with enoxaparin after surgery for cancer. N Engl J Med, 2002.PMID 11919306
  6. [13]Bauersachs R, et al. Oral rivaroxaban for symptomatic venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med, 2010.PMID 21128814
  7. [15]Agnelli G, et al. Oral apixaban for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med, 2013.PMID 23808982
  8. [16]Schulman S, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med, 2009.PMID 19966341
  9. [17]Kearon C, et al. A comparison of three months of anticoagulation with extended anticoagulation for a first episode of idiopathic venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med, 1999.PMID 10089183
  10. [18]Kearon C, et al. Comparison of low-intensity warfarin therapy with conventional-intensity warfarin therapy for long-term prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med, 2003.PMID 12917299
  11. [26]Decousus H, et al. A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis. Prévention du Risque d'Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave Study Group. N Engl J Med, 1998.PMID 9459643
  12. [27]Mismetti P, et al. Effect of a retrievable inferior vena cava filter plus anticoagulation vs anticoagulation alone on risk of recurrent pulmonary embolism: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 2015.PMID 25919526
  13. [28]Mismetti P, et al. A prospective long-term study of 220 patients with a retrievable vena cava filter for secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism. Chest, 2007.PMID 17218580
  14. [30]Meyer G, et al. Fibrinolysis for patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med, 2014.PMID 24716681
  15. [31]Kucher N, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism. Circulation, 2014.PMID 24226805
  16. [33]Leacche M, et al. Modern surgical treatment of massive pulmonary embolism: results in 47 consecutive patients after rapid diagnosis and aggressive surgical approach. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2005.PMID 15867775
PreviousTrunk choice by CLASS, ulcer healing versus recurrence, and tributary timing with nerve honestyvascularNextCritical view arithmetic, groin vessels and nerves, thyroid preservation, and watershed disciplineapplied-science