Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Gen Surg SAQsapplied-science

Gen Surg SAQs · applied-science

Critical view arithmetic, groin vessels and nerves, thyroid preservation, and watershed discipline

Fellowship SAQ on critical-view injury arithmetic with cystic-artery and aberrant-duct variants, groin layer with corona mortis triple-source and nerve mapping, thyroid monitoring against autotransplantation honesty with PARAFLUO preservation, Dutch mesorectal numbers, watershed discontinuity with flow and Sudeck measurement, appendix positions, Z0011 restraint, cushion hypertension with dentate-sparing results, and SMA pooling.

10 marks12 min2 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

FRACSFRCS(Gen Surg)ABSFRCSC
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

FRACSFRCS(Gen Surg)ABSFRCSC
Prompt
A consultant asks you to consent a laparoscopic cholecystectomy where the cystic artery looks small, plan a TEP repair in a patient with a known corona mortis, and counsel a thyroidectomy patient on voice and calcium risk. A rectal cancer case needs an envelope operation with radiotherapy counsel, and a right-colon anastomosis must survive its watershed. (A) Defend the critical view with injury numbers, price the arterial variants including Moynihan's hump, classify the aberrant duct, and quote the population injury ledger. (4 marks) (B) State the groin layer rule, triple-source the corona mortis with the tack-injury rule, place the three nerves, and give the IONM effect with parathyroid preservation honesty. (3 marks) (C) Give the Dutch mesorectal numbers with the national effect, the marginal-artery discontinuity ledger with flow physiology and Sudeck measurement, appendix positions, Z0011 de-escalation, cushion mechanism with dentate-sparing results, and SMA branch pooling. (3 marks)

Write your answer

Saved on this device. No marking — you are the marker.

(A) Open with the Strasberg baseline: laparoscopic injury 0.3 to 0.8 percent against open 0.2 percent, and the Italian 604-patient split — view non-use 54.6 percent where injury or bleeding occurred against 25.8 percent without events.[1] Price the variants before clipping the small artery: conventional anatomy only 86.15/89.02 percent with duplicate cystic 7.18 percent and hump 6.26 percent; right hepatic origin 85.75 percent with single artery 88.59 percent; Moynihan's hump 3.81 percent overall.[2][3][4] Classify any aberrant right hepatic duct: high-risk in 2.2 percent with a quarter needing subtotal resection — recognised variants finish without injury.[5] Close consent with the Czech register: 76,345 electives, 186 major injuries at 0.24 percent, open 1.28 percent against laparoscopic 0.06 percent.[7]

(B) Recite the layer: the defect lives only in transversus abdominis — deep ring, iliopubic tract, transversus arch, femoral sheath, Cooper's ligament.[8] Triple-source the corona: CTA arterial 32.2 percent at 2.40 mm median; TEP endoscopy either-vessel 40 percent; in-vivo TEP arterial 28.4 percent with 1.5 percent tack injuries through thin vessels — staple Cooper's near the symphysis.[9][11][13] Place the nerves: ilioinguinal in the Lichtenstein field, iliohypogastric cranial between obliques, genitofemoral beneath the cord — frequent fusion.[12] Monitor the thyroid nerve: paralysis 2.0 against 10.0 percent randomised, pooled transient odds ratio 0.62 and permanent 0.49 — then stay honest on calcium: grafting gives no recovery advantage with 38.0 against 19.3 percent transient hypocalcaemia, while autofluorescence cuts hypocalcaemia from 21.7 to 9.1 percent.[14][15][16][17]

(C) Excise in the envelope: Dutch 12-year local recurrence 5 against 11 percent with stage-III margin-negative survival 50 against 40 percent, and the national plane effect from 16 to 9 percent.[20][21] Respect the watersheds: marginal artery absent in up to 18 percent at flexure and rectosigmoid, median 50 percent flow fall after ligation with no 5-day recovery, Sudeck anastomosis absent in 4.7 percent at 1.9 mm.[22][24][25] Default the appendix retrocaecal at 35.98 and 26.9 percent with the perforation signal; restrain the axilla per Z0011 with 86.3 against 83.6 percent survival and nodal recurrence 0.5 against 1.5 percent.[26][27][28][29] Treat cushions as vascular — 35 against 10 cm of water with identical sphincter thickness — and spare the dentate line for 3.0 against 7.8 percent recurrence; ligate the right colon centrally knowing ileocolic 99.7, right colic 72.6 and middle colic 96.9 percent with right colic absent in 27.4 percent.[32][33][34]

References27ShowHide
  1. [1]Sgaramella LI, et al. The critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Strasberg Yes or No? An Italian Multicentre study. Surg Endosc, 2021.PMID 32780231
  2. [2]Triantafyllou G, et al. Intraoperative Variations of Cystic Artery and Duct in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis. ANZ J Surg, 2026.PMID 41913469
  3. [3]Triantafyllou G, et al. Surgical anatomy of the cystic artery: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Ann Anat, 2025.PMID 39369802
  4. [4]Asghar A, et al. Moynihan's hump of the right hepatic artery in Calot's triangle: a systematic review and meta-analysis of its incidence and surgical importance. Surg Radiol Anat, 2023.PMID 36932210
  5. [5]Kurahashi S, et al. A novel classification of aberrant right hepatic ducts ensures a critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc, 2020.PMID 32377838
  6. [7]Klos D, et al. Major iatrogenic bile duct injury during elective cholecystectomy: a Czech population register-based study. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2023.PMID 37079112
  7. [8]Condon RE, et al. The Biology and Anatomy of Inguinofemoral Hernia. Semin Laparosc Surg, 1994.PMID 10401043
  8. [9]Meza C, et al. Frequency and demographic variability of the corona mortis: Insights from computed tomography angiography. Injury, 2026.PMID 42030598
  9. [11]Lau H, et al. A prospective endoscopic study of retropubic vascular anatomy in 121 patients undergoing endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty. Surg Endosc, 2003.PMID 12802654
  10. [12]Moseholm VB, et al. Anatomical variations of the ilioinguinal, iliohypogastric, and genitofemoral nerves: a systematic scoping review of cadaver studies. Hernia, 2025.PMID 40447932
  11. [13]Ates M, et al. Corona mortis: in vivo anatomical knowledge and the risk of injury in totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Hernia, 2016.PMID 26621137
  12. [14]Xin Y, et al. Intraoperative neuromonitoring reduces vocal cord injury in open thyroid cancer surgery: results from a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc, 2026.PMID 41340008
  13. [15]Merchavy S, et al. Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring Parameters and Risk of Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Injury in Thyroidectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Biomedicines, 2025.PMID 41153796
  14. [16]Kasmirski JA, et al. Does Parathyroid Autotransplantation Prevent Hypoparathyroidism After Thyroid Surgery? Ann Surg, 2026.PMID 39811957
  15. [17]Benmiloud F, et al. Association of Autofluorescence-Based Detection of the Parathyroid Glands During Total Thyroidectomy With Postoperative Hypocalcemia Risk: Results of the PARAFLUO Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg, 2020.PMID 31693081
  16. [20]van Gijn W, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer: 12-year follow-up of the multicentre, randomised controlled TME trial. Lancet Oncol, 2011.PMID 21596621
  17. [21]Kapiteijn E, et al. Impact of the introduction and training of total mesorectal excision on recurrence and survival in rectal cancer in The Netherlands. Br J Surg, 2002.PMID 12190680
  18. [22]Cirocchi R, et al. Discontinuity of marginal artery at splenic flexure and rectosigmoid junction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis, 2023.PMID 37317032
  19. [24]Dworkin MJ, et al. Effect of inferior mesenteric artery ligation on blood flow in the marginal artery-dependent sigmoid colon. J Am Coll Surg, 1996.PMID 8843265
  20. [25]van Tonder JJ, et al. Anatomical considerations on Sudeck's critical point and its relevance to colorectal surgery. Clin Anat, 2007.PMID 17022033
  21. [26]Khatun S, et al. Prevalence of Retrocaecal Appendix among Patients with Appendicitis in A Tertiary Care Hospital of Nepal. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc, 2019.PMID 31477952
  22. [27]Nur Bazlaah B, et al. Incidence of Retrocaecal Acute Appendicitis at the Hospital Sultanah Nora Ismail (HSNI) Batu Pahat. Med J Malaysia, 2021.PMID 33742632
  23. [28]Giuliano AE, et al. Effect of Axillary Dissection vs No Axillary Dissection on 10-Year Overall Survival Among Women With Invasive Breast Cancer and Sentinel Node Metastasis: The ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance) Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA, 2017.PMID 28898379
  24. [29]Giuliano AE, et al. Locoregional Recurrence After Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection With or Without Axillary Dissection in Patients With Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases: Long-term Follow-up From the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (Alliance) ACOSOG Z0011 Randomized Trial. Ann Surg, 2016.PMID 27513155
  25. [32]Sun WM, et al. Haemorrhoids are associated not with hypertrophy of the internal anal sphincter, but with hypertension of the anal cushions. Br J Surg, 1992.PMID 1611462
  26. [33]Yu Q, et al. Efficacy of Ruiyun procedure for hemorrhoids combined simplified Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy with dentate line-sparing in treating grade III/IV hemorrhoids: a retrospective study. BMC Surg, 2021.PMID 34016101
  27. [34]Cirocchi R, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of variants of the branches of the superior mesenteric artery: the Achilles heel of right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision? Colorectal Dis, 2021.PMID 34358401
PreviousWells-gated diagnosis with PERC and D-dimer honesty, DOAC-duration arithmetic, and filter-plus-lysis restraintvascularNextThresholds, risk scores, trial choice, and lifelong follow-upapplied-science