Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

GP Topicsrespiratory-health

GP · respiratory-health

Lung cancer suspicion

Also known as Lung nodule · Suspected lung cancer · Pulmonary nodule

GP-fellowship guide to lung cancer suspicion: the presentations that trigger investigation, why a normal CXR does not exclude lung cancer, the NLST and NELSON evidence for low-dose CT screening (20% and 24% mortality reductions), the Brock model for nodule malignancy prediction, nodule follow-up intervals, referral triggers, and the pitfalls of over-watching a malignant nodule.

medium3 referencesUpdated 21 Aug 20263 min readVerification in progress

Practise this topic

  • SAQ
  • Viva

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic

  • Short-answer question1
  • Viva station1

Target exams

RACGP AKTRACGP KFPRACGP CCE

Red flags

  • A normal CXR does NOT exclude lung cancer — a normal CXR misses up to 20-25% of lung cancers; if clinical suspicion is high, CT is the next step regardless of CXR result
  • New haemoptysis in a smoker over 40 is lung cancer until excluded — urgent CXR and CT, not a course of antibiotics
  • An incidental pulmonary nodule on a scan done for other reasons is not an incidental finding — it needs size-based follow-up per guidelines
  • Unexplained weight loss, finger clubbing, or supraclavicular lymphadenopathy in a smoker is lung cancer until excluded
On this page
Study tools

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic

  • Short-answer question1
  • Viva station1

Target exams

RACGP AKTRACGP KFPRACGP CCE

Red flags

  • A normal CXR does NOT exclude lung cancer — a normal CXR misses up to 20-25% of lung cancers; if clinical suspicion is high, CT is the next step regardless of CXR result
  • New haemoptysis in a smoker over 40 is lung cancer until excluded — urgent CXR and CT, not a course of antibiotics
  • An incidental pulmonary nodule on a scan done for other reasons is not an incidental finding — it needs size-based follow-up per guidelines
  • Unexplained weight loss, finger clubbing, or supraclavicular lymphadenopathy in a smoker is lung cancer until excluded
Key points
  • Low-dose CT screening reduced lung cancer mortality by 20% in the NLST (95% CI 6.8–26.7) and by 24% at 10 years in the NELSON trial — screening works for high-risk smokers.[1][2]
  • A normal CXR does not exclude lung cancer. If clinical suspicion is high in a smoker, CT is the next step regardless of CXR result.
  • The Brock model predicts malignancy risk in pulmonary nodules using nodule size, spiculation, upper lobe location and patient factors — validated externally in NLST data.[3]
  • Any incidental pulmonary nodule found on imaging needs size-based follow-up per guidelines, not dismissal as "incidental".

Overview

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in Australia. It presents late because early disease is asymptomatic, and the symptoms it does produce (cough, breathlessness) are attributed to smoking. The GP's role is threefold: recognise presentations that warrant investigation, interpret incidental nodules correctly, and identify who qualifies for low-dose CT screening.[1]

General Practice Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this topic. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the General Practice fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References3ShowHide
  1. [1]Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening N Engl J Med, 2011.PMID 21714641
  2. [2]de Koning HJ, van der Aalst CM, de Jong PA, et al. Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Volume CT Screening in a Randomized Trial N Engl J Med, 2020.PMID 31995683
  3. [3]Winter A, Aberle DR, Hsu W External validation and recalibration of the Brock model to predict probability of cancer in pulmonary nodules using NLST data Thorax, 2019.PMID 30898897

Test yourself

Practise what you just read

  • SAQ
  • Viva
General Practice Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete General Practice library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousCOPDrespiratory-healthNextObstructive sleep apnoearespiratory-health