Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

EM VivasSyncope (approach)

EM Vivas · Syncope (approach)

Syncope — the differential and the risk stratification

A communication viva on the benign reflex syncope and the discharge advice.

communication2 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

ACEMFRCEMABEM
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

ACEMFRCEMABEM
Prompt
A 24-year-old woman presents after a collapse at a wedding. She felt hot, nauseated and her vision darkened before she lost consciousness for about 30 seconds, recovering fully. Her ECG is normal. Discuss how you distinguish syncope from its mimics, how you classify and risk-stratify this event, and what discharge advice you give.

Interpretation

Reveal interpretationShowHide

The differential (the exclusion of the mimics): This is the syncope — the transient loss of consciousness with the rapid recovery and the prodrome (the warmth, the nausea, the darkened vision), from the global cerebral hypoperfusion. The seizure is excluded by the absence of the motor features, the tongue-biting, the incontinence, and the postictal confusion. The psychogenic pseudosyncope is excluded by the prodrome and the pallor (the true loss of consciousness). The hypoglycaemia is excluded by the rapid onset and the glucose. The cardiac syncope is excluded by the prodrome (the cardiac syncope is typically without the warning), the trigger (the hot environment, the prolonged standing), the young age, and the normal ECG.[1]

The classification: the vasovagal (the reflex) syncope — the situational trigger (the hot, the crowded, the prolonged standing), the typical prodrome, the young age, the rapid recovery, and the normal examination and ECG.[1]

The risk stratification: the low-risk patient — the reflex mechanism, the young age, the normal ECG, the no high-risk features (the no exertional, the no palpitations, the no family history of the sudden death, the no structural heart disease, the no abnormal ECG). The San Francisco and the Canadian scores confirm the low risk.[3][4]

[4]The discharge advice: the explanation of the benign vasovagal mechanism and the reassurance; the recognition of the prodrome and the lying down at the onset; the hydration; the avoidance of the triggers (the hot, the crowded, the prolonged standing, the rapid standing); the gradual rising from the sitting and the lying; the physical counter-pressure manoeuvres (the leg-crossing, the hand-grip); and the safety-netting to return if the syncope is recurrent, the exertional, or with chest pain or the palpitations. The driving is not restricted for the single benign vasovagal event.

Emergency Medicine Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this viva. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Emergency Medicine fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References3ShowHide
  1. [1]Brignole M, Moya A, de Lange FJ, et al. 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope. European Heart Journal, 2018.PMID 29562304
  2. [3]Suh EH, Winskill C, Sacco DL, et al. Validation of 2 syncope risk scores and comparison with physician risk estimation. JAMA Network Open, 2026.PMID 42154462
  3. [4]Quinn JV, Stiell IG, McDermott DA, et al. Derivation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule to predict patients with short-term serious outcomes Ann Emerg Med, 2004.PMID 14747812
Emergency Medicine Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Emergency Medicine library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousSubarachnoid haemorrhage — diagnosis, grading and complicationsSubarachnoid haemorrhageNextTachyarrhythmias — the structured approach and the dangerous trapsTachyarrhythmias