EM Vivas · Recognition of deterioration (track and trigger)
Deteriorating patient — trend interpretation viva
A data-interpretation viva on recognising a deteriorating patient from the trend in observations and enacting the track-and-trigger response.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
Interpretation
Reveal interpretationShowHide
This patient is deteriorating. The trend across all parameters over six hours tells the story: the respiratory rate has risen from 18 to 24, the saturation has fallen from 96 to 92 per cent on air, the blood pressure has fallen from 118 to 98, the heart rate has risen from 88 to 112, the temperature has risen, and she has developed new confusion. At presentation her aggregate was low; now each parameter has moved adversely, and the new confusion is a high-scoring marker. The picture is one of sepsis evolving into septic shock with developing cerebral hypoperfusion.[2]
Quantifying it: her current NEWS2 aggregates into the emergency range — the single most important point is that the trend, not any one reading, makes the diagnosis: she was abnormal and is getting worse, and she is compensating less and less.[2]
The response is immediate. Escalate to a senior clinician and critical care, move her to the resuscitation bay, and begin a structured ABCDE resuscitation with the sepsis bundle running in parallel. The failure mode to avoid is one evidence highlights: abnormal observations that are charted but not acted upon.[1]
References2ShowHide
- [1]Smith GB, Redfern O, Maruotti A, et al. The association between nurse staffing levels and a failure to respond to patients with deranged physiology. Resuscitation, 2020.PMID 31945427
- [2]Smith GB, Redfern OC, Pimentel MA, et al. The National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2). Clin Med (Lond), 2019.PMID 31092526