Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

EM VivasRecognition of deterioration (track and trigger)

EM Vivas · Recognition of deterioration (track and trigger)

Deteriorating patient — trend interpretation viva

A data-interpretation viva on recognising a deteriorating patient from the trend in observations and enacting the track-and-trigger response.

data1 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

ACEMFRCEMABEM
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

ACEMFRCEMABEM
Prompt
An 84-year-old woman on the emergency observation ward, six hours after presentation with a urinary tract infection. Her observations at presentation were: respiratory rate 18, oxygen saturation 96 percent on air, blood pressure 118/70, pulse 88, alert, temperature 37.4. Now her observations are: respiratory rate 24, oxygen saturation 92 percent on air, blood pressure 98/58, pulse 112, new confusion, temperature 38.6. Interpret the trend and describe your response.

Interpretation

Reveal interpretationShowHide

This patient is deteriorating. The trend across all parameters over six hours tells the story: the respiratory rate has risen from 18 to 24, the saturation has fallen from 96 to 92 per cent on air, the blood pressure has fallen from 118 to 98, the heart rate has risen from 88 to 112, the temperature has risen, and she has developed new confusion. At presentation her aggregate was low; now each parameter has moved adversely, and the new confusion is a high-scoring marker. The picture is one of sepsis evolving into septic shock with developing cerebral hypoperfusion.[2]

Quantifying it: her current NEWS2 aggregates into the emergency range — the single most important point is that the trend, not any one reading, makes the diagnosis: she was abnormal and is getting worse, and she is compensating less and less.[2]

The response is immediate. Escalate to a senior clinician and critical care, move her to the resuscitation bay, and begin a structured ABCDE resuscitation with the sepsis bundle running in parallel. The failure mode to avoid is one evidence highlights: abnormal observations that are charted but not acted upon.[1]

Emergency Medicine Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this viva. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Emergency Medicine fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References2ShowHide
  1. [1]Smith GB, Redfern O, Maruotti A, et al. The association between nurse staffing levels and a failure to respond to patients with deranged physiology. Resuscitation, 2020.PMID 31945427
  2. [2]Smith GB, Redfern OC, Pimentel MA, et al. The National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2). Clin Med (Lond), 2019.PMID 31092526
Emergency Medicine Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Emergency Medicine library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousDeteriorating patient — data interpretation vivaABCDE approachNextDisaster preparedness — HICS, surge continuum and decontaminationDisaster preparedness