Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

EM VivasABCDE approach

EM Vivas · ABCDE approach

Deteriorating patient — data interpretation viva

A clinical data-interpretation viva on recognising and resuscitating the deteriorating patient, with model interpretation and key points.

clinical1 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

ACEMFRCEMABEM
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

ACEMFRCEMABEM
Prompt
An 82-year-old woman in the emergency department observation ward, four hours after presentation with a urinary tract infection, now has the following observations: respiratory rate 30 per minute, oxygen saturation 87 percent on room air, heart rate 128, blood pressure 78/46, temperature 35.6 degrees Celsius, Glasgow Coma Score 13, and a venous lactate of 4.2 mmol/L. The nurse asks you to review her urgently.

Interpretation

Reveal interpretationShowHide

This patient is critically ill and deteriorating, with a high early-warning score across every system, and meets the clinical picture of septic shock: hypotension, a markedly raised lactate, hypothermia, and confusion, all on a background of presumed infection. The pattern is one of decompensated septic shock with respiratory and neurological compromise, and she requires immediate resuscitation by a team, in parallel with the sepsis bundle.[2]

Apply ABCDE as a cycle. Secure the airway and give high-flow oxygen for the hypoxaemia; the respiratory rate of 30 with saturation of 87 percent signals impending respiratory failure, so prepare for escalation. Establish intravenous access, send cultures and bloods including lactate and a gas, and give a balanced crystalloid bolus with reassessment, commencing vasopressors for fluid-refractory hypotension to a mean arterial pressure target. Give broad-spectrum antibiotics without delay — each additional hour to antibiotics was associated with higher mortality in mandated sepsis care — and arrange source control. Check a bedside glucose, then fully expose to seek the source while keeping her warm, since she is hypothermic.[3] [4]

Emergency Medicine Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this viva. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Emergency Medicine fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References4ShowHide
  1. [1]Gao H, McDonnell A, Harrison DA, et al. Systematic review and evaluation of physiological track and trigger warning systems for identifying at-risk patients on the ward. Intensive Care Medicine, 2007.PMID 17318499
  2. [2]Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA, 2016.PMID 26903338
  3. [3]Monnet X, Messina A, Greco M, et al. ESICM guidelines on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring 2025. Intensive Care Medicine, 2025.PMID 41236566
  4. [4]Seymour CW, Gesten F, Prescott HC, et al. Time to treatment and mortality during mandated emergency care for sepsis. New England Journal of Medicine, 2017.PMID 28528569
Emergency Medicine Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Emergency Medicine library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousDelirium in the elderly vivaDelirium in the elderlyNextDeteriorating patient — trend interpretation vivaRecognition of deterioration (track and trigger)