EM · Sepsis and septic shock (approach)
Sepsis and septic shock — the emergency department approach
Also known as Sepsis · Septic shock · Sepsis-3 · The Hour-1 bundle · qSOFA · The septic patient
Sepsis is the life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, defined by Sepsis-3 as suspected infection with an acute rise in the SOFA score of 2 or more, and septic shock as sepsis requiring vasopressors to hold a mean arterial pressure of 65 or above with a serum lactate over 2 mmol per litre despite adequate fluid. The emergency department approach rests on the qSOFA prompt (a respiratory rate of 22 or above, an altered mentation, a systolic blood pressure of 100 or below) and delivers the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Hour-1 bundle — the lactate, the blood cultures before the antibiotic, the broad-spectrum antibiotics (ceftriaxone 2 g IV, piperacillin-tazobactam 4.5 g IV, meropenem 1 g IV; vancomycin 1.5 g IV for MRSA; metronidazole 500 mg IV for anaerobic cover), the 30 mL per kilogram crystalloid, and the early vasopressor for a mean arterial pressure below 65 — followed by the lactate-guided resuscitation and the source control. The differential is the other shock states and the SIRS mimics. ACEM-primary, globally tagged.
Checked against its sources on 1 Sept 2026
Practise this topic
On this page
Related topics
- Paediatric sepsis and septic shock (the septic child in the emergency department)
- Damage control resuscitation in trauma
- Fluid resuscitation in the emergency department
- Community-acquired pneumonia
- Meningitis and encephalitis (emergency department diagnosis and management)
- Immunocompromised host and febrile neutropenia
Study tools
Your progress
Saved on this device.
Target exams
Red flags
- A lactate over 2 mmol per litre signals tissue hypoperfusion; a lactate over 4 mmol per litre with hypoperfusion demands aggressive resuscitation regardless of the blood pressure
- Hypotension in sepsis is a late sign — a normotensive patient with a raised lactate and an altered mentation is already in trouble; resuscitate on the perfusion deficit, not the pressure
- Give the first antibiotic within the first hour — every hour of delay in septic shock adds measurable mortality; draw cultures only if it does not delay the dose
- A mean arterial pressure below 65 after 30 mL per kilogram of crystalloid needs a vasopressor, not a seventh litre — start noradrenaline early through a peripheral line while central access is secured
- Never close the diagnosis on SIRS alone — sepsis is defined by organ dysfunction; pancreatitis, adrenal crisis and the poisons all generate SIRS and demand their own therapy
Meet the patient
A 68-year-old man is brought in confused, breathless, and shivering; his wife says he has been feverish and dysuric for two days. His blood pressure is 88/52, heart rate 124, respiratory rate 28, and he is oliguric. The triage nurse has drawn the lactate — it is 5.2 mmol per litre. You have met the patient the Hour-1 bundle was written for: infected, decompensating, and losing ground by the minute.[1]
[4]Two questions decide the next hour in every septic patient: is the circulation failing — lactate up, MAP down, perfusion poor? (the bundle and the vasopressor answer) and where is the source, and can I control it? (the imaging, the cultures, and the surgeon or the drain answer). Resuscitation and source hunt run in parallel, never in sequence.[1]
References25ShowHide
- [1]Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) JAMA, 2016.PMID 26903338
- [2]Seymour CW, Liu VX, Iwashyna TJ, et al. Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) JAMA, 2016.PMID 26903335
- [3]Rudd KE, Seymour CW, Aluisio AR, et al. Association of the Quick Sequential (Sepsis-Related) Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) Score With Excess Hospital Mortality in Adults With Suspected Infection in Low- and Middle-Income Countries JAMA, 2018.PMID 29800114
- [4]Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021 Intensive Care Med, 2021.PMID 34599691
- [5]Seymour CW, Gesten F, Prescott HC, et al. Time to Treatment and Mortality during Mandated Emergency Care for Sepsis N Engl J Med, 2017.PMID 28528569
- [6]Semler MW, Self WH, Wanderer JP, et al. Balanced Crystalloids versus Saline in Critically Ill Adults N Engl J Med, 2018.PMID 29485925
- [7]Asfar P, Meziani F, Hamel JF, et al. High versus low blood-pressure target in patients with septic shock N Engl J Med, 2014.PMID 24635770
- [8]De Backer D, Biston P, Devriendt J, et al. Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock N Engl J Med, 2010.PMID 20200382
- [9]Venkatesh B, Finfer S, Cohen J, et al. Adjunctive Glucocorticoid Therapy in Patients with Septic Shock N Engl J Med, 2018.PMID 29347874
- [10]Hernández G, Ospina-Tascón GA, Damiani LP, et al. Effect of a Resuscitation Strategy Targeting Peripheral Perfusion Status vs Serum Lactate Levels on 28-Day Mortality Among Patients With Septic Shock: The ANDROMEDA-SHOCK Randomized Clinical Trial JAMA, 2019.PMID 30772908
- [11]Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock N Engl J Med, 2001.PMID 11794169
- [12]Yealy DM, Kellum JA, Huang DT, et al. A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock N Engl J Med, 2014.PMID 24635773
- [13]Peake SL, Delaney A, Bailey M, et al. Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock N Engl J Med, 2014.PMID 25272316
- [14]Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power GS, et al. Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock N Engl J Med, 2015.PMID 25776532
- [15]Annane D, Renault A, Brun-Buisson C, et al. Hydrocortisone plus Fludrocortisone for Adults with Septic Shock N Engl J Med, 2018.PMID 29490185
- [16]Levy MM, Evans LE, Rhodes A. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Bundle: 2018 Update Crit Care Med, 2018.PMID 29767636
- [17]Jones AE, Shapiro NI, Trzeciak S, et al. Lactate Clearance vs Central Venous Oxygen Saturation as Goals of Early Sepsis Therapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial JAMA, 2010.PMID 20179283
- [18]Shapiro NI, Douglas IS, Brower RG, et al. Early Restrictive or Liberal Fluid Management for Sepsis-Induced Hypotension N Engl J Med, 2023.PMID 36688507
- [19]Meyhoff TS, Hjortrup PB, Wetterslev J, et al. Restriction of Intravenous Fluid in ICU Patients with Septic Shock N Engl J Med, 2022.PMID 35709019
- [20]Russell JA, Walley KR, Singer J, et al. Vasopressin versus Norepinephrine Infusion in Patients with Septic Shock N Engl J Med, 2008.PMID 18305265
- [21]Finfer S, Chittock DR, Su SY, et al. Intensive versus Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients N Engl J Med, 2009.PMID 19318384
- [22]Long B, Koyfman A, Gottlieb M. Complications in the Adult Asplenic Patient: A Review for the Emergency Clinician Am J Emerg Med, 2021.PMID 32247651
- [23]Zampieri FG, Damiani LP, Bakker J, et al. Effects of a Resuscitation Strategy Targeting Peripheral Perfusion Status versus Serum Lactate Levels among Patients with Septic Shock. A Bayesian Reanalysis of the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK Trial Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2020.PMID 31574228
- [24]Wong CH, Khin LW, Heng KS, et al. The LRINEC (Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis) score: a tool for distinguishing necrotizing fasciitis from other soft tissue infections Crit Care Med, 2004.PMID 15241098
- [25]Abdullah M, McWilliams B, Khan SU, et al. Reliability of the Laboratory Risk Indicator in Necrotising Fasciitis (LRINEC) score Surgeon, 2019.PMID 30166238