EM SAQs · Wound closure and suturing techniques
Wound closure — material, technique, and secondary intention
ACEM-style SAQ on layered closure, bite secondary intention, gauge and removal intervals.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
Model answer
Reveal model answerShowHide
(a) Layered forearm closure. After irrigation and debridement to healthy bleeding tissue, document distal neurovascular/tendon function before local anaesthetic. Close deep dermis/subcutis with absorbable suture (e.g. 4-0 Vicryl) to take tension, then epidermal apposition with non-absorbable monofilament (e.g. 4-0 nylon) using interrupted or mattress technique with edge eversion. Avoid strangulating knots.[1]
(b) Cat bite. Mammalian bites inoculate oral flora (including Pasteurella); primary closure traps bacteria and drives deep infection, especially in the hand. Clean, irrigate, debride necrotic tissue, leave open (secondary intention or delayed primary), elevate, start amoxicillin-clavulanate, early review, tetanus update. Tissue adhesive is inappropriate for infected/contaminated bites.[2]
(c) Gauge and removal. Typical gauges: face 5-0, body 4-0, scalp/extremity 3-0. Removal: face ~5 days (prevents cross-hatch scarring), scalp/body 7–10 days, joints ~14 days because motion delays tensile strength. Paediatric facial wounds may use rapidly absorbing suture to avoid removal visits.[1][3]
References4ShowHide
- [1]Elfar A, Ahmed Osman Mohamed A, Mahdi A, et al. Suture Techniques for Traumatic Wound Closure in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review of Cosmetic, Functional, and Infection-Related Outcomes. Cureus, 2025.PMID 40792329
- [2]Quinn JV, Polevoi SK, Kohn MA Traumatic lacerations: what are the risks for infection and has the 'golden period' of laceration care disappeared? Emergency Medicine Journal, 2014.PMID 23314208
- [3]Farion KJ, Osmond MH, Hartling L, et al. Tissue adhesives for traumatic lacerations: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Academic Emergency Medicine, 2003.PMID 12574007
- [4]Wong EM, Rainer TH, Ng YC, et al. Cost-effectiveness of Dermabond versus sutures for lacerated wound closure: a randomised controlled trial. Hong Kong Med J, 2011.PMID 22147351