Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

EM SAQsWound assessment and management

EM SAQs · Wound assessment and management

Contaminated hand laceration with unknown tetanus status

An ACEM-style SAQ on a contaminated hand laceration with partial extensor tendon injury, unknown tetanus status and a diabetic host — the structured MEAT assessment, the irrigation and debridement standard, the tetanus prophylaxis decision with products and doses, the closure decision, antibiotic prophylaxis, and the disposition with safety-netting.

15 marks15 min4 min readSource-verified ·

Target exams

ACEMFRCEMABEM
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

ACEMFRCEMABEM
Prompt
A 58-year-old sheep farmer presents to the emergency department 6 hours after lacerating the dorsum of his left hand on a rusty barbed-wire fence while fixing a paddock gate. The wound is a 5 cm transverse laceration contaminated with soil and grass. He has type 2 diabetes (HbA1c 78 mmol/mol) and cannot recall ever receiving a tetanus injection. He moved to Australia from a rural region overseas 20 years ago. On examination, distal capillary refill is less than 2 seconds, radial and ulnar pulses are intact, two-point discrimination is symmetrical on all digits, and he can extend and flex all fingers fully against resistance, though there is a partial-thickness cut into the extensor tendon of the middle finger visible in the wound bed. (a) Describe your structured wound assessment and the high-risk features of this wound (4 marks). (b) Outline the management including irrigation, debridement, tetanus prophylaxis (state product, dose, route) and the closure decision with justification (8 marks). (c) What antibiotic prophylaxis will you give and why? What is your disposition and safety-net advice? (3 marks).

Model answer

Reveal model answerShowHide

(a) Structured wound assessment and high-risk features (4 marks).

Assess using MEAT:

  • Mechanism — a laceration from a sharp object (barbed wire) but with a crush element from the wire pull; predictable contamination with soil and organic material (the vector for Clostridium tetani spores).
  • Examination — depth extends to partial extensor tendon involvement of the middle finger (visible in the wound bed); contamination with soil and grass; explore for retained foreign body (wire fragment, grass) under local anaesthesia with good lighting and image if glass or metal is suspected. Neurovascular documented and intact — radial and ulnar pulses, capillary refill under 2 seconds, symmetrical two-point discrimination on all digits; tendon tested through full active range of motion against resistance — he can flex and extend all fingers, but a partial extensor tendon laceration of the middle finger is confirmed on exploration (a hand-surgery referral finding).
  • Age — 6 hours since injury; within a window where the closure decision integrates age with contamination and host rather than a rigid golden-period clock.
  • Type / host — soil and organic contamination (dirty wound class); high-risk host with type 2 diabetes (HbA1c 78 mmol/mol, poorly controlled) and unknown tetanus status (likely unvaccinated, immigrated from a region with low immunisation coverage).
[1]

The high-risk features are: dirty/contaminated wound class, soil contamination (tetanus vector), hand location, partial extensor tendon injury, diabetic host, and unknown tetanus status.[3]

(b) Management — irrigation, debridement, tetanus prophylaxis, closure decision (8 marks).

  • Analgesia — local anaesthesia per the local wound-care protocol (after the neurovascular and tendon exam is documented) or a regional block given the partial tendon injury.
  • Irrigation — copious normal saline before any closure decision (tap water equivalent: 3.5 vs 6.4 percent double-blind, 4 vs 3.3 percent multicentre); 20-mL-plus syringe for deep wounds.
  • Debridement — excise obviously devitalised tissue to a clean margin; remove all soil, grass and any wire fragment under direct vision. Re-explore to confirm no retained foreign body (OR 2.6 for infection).
  • Tetanus prophylaxis — soil-contaminated wound in a patient with unknown status. Apply the ACIP wound-management indication: Td or Tdap where Td alone was previously recommended, including catch-up from age 7 with incomplete or unknown history — with the 5-dose DTaP plus adolescent Tdap schedule as the background frame. Document the product, dose, route, site and the reasoning.
  • Partial extensor tendon injury — refer to hand surgery; a partial tendon laceration seen in the wound bed is not repaired or primarily closed in the ED. The wound over the tendon is left open or managed by delayed primary closure.
  • Closure decision — given the contaminated wound, the partial tendon injury and the diabetic host, this wound is NOT closed primarily. Manage by delayed primary closure — dress the wound open with a non-adherent dressing, arrange review, and close if clean at the review visit. Closing now would trap residual soil bacteria in a high-risk host and over an injured tendon.
[6]

(c) Antibiotic prophylaxis, disposition and safety-netting (3 marks).

  • Antibiotic prophylaxis — indicated because this is a contaminated wound in a diabetic (high-risk host) with a partial tendon injury. per local protocol for contaminated wounds in high-risk hosts — diabetes (OR 6.7 / RR 2.70), contamination (RR 2.0) and foreign bodies (OR 2.6) each independently raise infection risk. This is NOT a bite wound.
  • Disposition — refer to hand surgery (in hours) for the partial extensor tendon injury; arrange a 48-hour wound review for signs of infection (this is a high-risk wound). Treat tetanus prophylaxis as above. Check renal function and glycaemic control given the HbA1c. The wound is dressed open with a non-adherent dressing and a bandage; splint in a position of function if over a joint.
  • Safety-net advice — return immediately for spreading redness, increasing pain, fever, pus, a cold or numb limb, or difficulty moving the fingers. Counsel on the risk of infection and tendon dysfunction, the need for the 48-hour review and hand-surgery follow-up, and the importance of diabetic control for wound healing.
[1]
Emergency Medicine Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this SAQ. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Emergency Medicine fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References5ShowHide
  1. [1]Weiss EA, Oldham G, Lin M, Foster E, Quinn JV. Water is a safe and effective alternative to sterile normal saline for wound irrigation prior to suturing. BMJ Open, 2013.PMID 23325896
  2. [3]Hollander JE, Singer AJ, Valentine SM, Shofer FS. Risk factors for infection in patients with traumatic lacerations. Academic Emergency Medicine, 2001.PMID 11435186
  3. [6]Havers FP, Moro PL, Hunter P, Hariri S, Bernstein H. Use of Tetanus Toxoid, Reduced Diphtheria Toxoid, and Acellular Pertussis Vaccines: Updated Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices — United States, 2019. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 2020.PMID 31971933
  4. [9]Liang JL, Tiwari T, Moro P, et al. Prevention of Pertussis, Tetanus, and Diphtheria with Vaccines in the United States: ACIP Recommendations. MMWR Recommendations and Reports, 2018.PMID 29702631
  5. [4]Quinn JV, Polevoi SK, Kohn MA. Traumatic lacerations: what are the risks for infection and has the golden period of laceration care disappeared? Emerg Med J, 2014.PMID 23314208
Emergency Medicine Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Emergency Medicine library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousCommunity-acquired pneumoniaCommunity-acquired pneumoniaNextCritical appraisal of a trial abstract — PICO, validity, effect size and applicabilityResearch, EBM and biostatistics