Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

EM SAQsSecondary survey

EM SAQs · Secondary survey

The secondary survey of the stable trauma patient

An ACEM-style SAQ on the ATLS secondary survey.

10 marks10 min1 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

ACEMFRCEMABEM
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

ACEMFRCEMABEM
Prompt
A 40-year-old woman is stable after a primary survey for a high-speed motor-vehicle collision. Outline the key components of the secondary survey, the decision rules you would apply, and the principle of the tertiary survey. (10 marks)

Model answer

Reveal model answerShowHide

AMPLE history: allergies, medications (anticoagulants), past history, last meal, events (mechanism).[2] Head and face: scalp lacerations, raccoon eyes or Battle sign for basal skull fracture, pupils, mouth, ears.[2] Neck: trachea, JVP, penetrating wounds. Cervical spine cleared by NEXUS (all five criteria) or imaged by CT.[3] Chest: clavicular and rib fractures, breath sounds, cardiac murmurs, FAST review.[6] Abdomen: distension, tenderness, guarding, seat-belt sign. Pelvis by gentle lateral compression only.[2] Perineum/rectum: blood at the meatus (urethral injury — withhold catheter), sphincter tone, prostate position.[2] Extremities: deformity, pulses, sensation, compartment syndrome. Log roll for the back and spine.[2] Neurological: GCS, pupils, motor and sensory.[2] Decision rules: Canadian CT Head Rule (the high-risk criteria for the CT head in the minor head injury), NEXUS or the Canadian C-Spine Rule for the cervical-spine clearance.[1][3][5] Tertiary survey: a complete repeat within 24 hours, with the review of all imaging and labs, to catch the missed injuries.[4]

Emergency Medicine Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this SAQ. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Emergency Medicine fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References6ShowHide
  1. [1]Papa L, Stiell IG, Clement CM, et al. Performance of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria for predicting any traumatic intracranial injury on computed tomography in a United States Level I trauma center. Acad Emerg Med, 2012.PMID 22251188
  2. [2]Polmear MM, et al. Early care of polytraumatized patients: a framework for orthopaedic surgeons. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2025.PMID 39739953
  3. [3]Hoffman JR, Mower WR, Wolfson AB, et al. Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Group N Engl J Med, 2000.PMID 10891516
  4. [4]Keijzers GB, Giannakopoulos GF, Del Mar C, et al. The effect of tertiary surveys on missed injuries in trauma: a systematic review Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med, 2012.PMID 23190504
  5. [5]Stiell IG, Clement CM, McKnight RD, et al. The Canadian C-spine rule versus the NEXUS low-risk criteria in patients with trauma N Engl J Med, 2003.PMID 14695411
  6. [6]Stengel D, Rademacher G, Ekkernkamp A, et al. Emergency ultrasound-based algorithms for diagnosing blunt abdominal trauma Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2015.PMID 26368505
Emergency Medicine Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Emergency Medicine library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousThe resolved deficit — transient ischaemic attack in the emergency departmentTransient ischaemic attackNextThe septic anticoagulated patient — interpreting a multi-test panelLaboratory interpretation