Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

EM SAQsRecognition of deterioration (track and trigger)

EM SAQs · Recognition of deterioration (track and trigger)

NEWS2 calculation and the escalation response

An ACEM-style short-answer question on calculating the NEWS2 and acting on the key escalation threshold, with model answer, common errors and examiner notes.

10 marks10 min2 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

ACEMFRCEMABEM
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

ACEMFRCEMABEM
Prompt
A 72-year-old man is admitted with a lower respiratory tract infection. His observations are: respiratory rate 22 per minute, oxygen saturation 94 percent on air, no supplemental oxygen, blood pressure 104/62 mmHg, pulse 102 beats per minute, alert, temperature 38.2 degrees Celsius. Calculate his NEWS2, and outline the immediate clinical response and its rationale. (10 marks)

Model answer

Reveal model answerShowHide

Score each parameter in turn. Respiratory rate 22 scores 2 (21 to 24). Oxygen saturation 94 percent on air, using scale 1, scores 1 (94 to 95). Supplemental oxygen: air scores 0. Systolic blood pressure 104 scores 1 (101 to 110). Pulse 102 scores 1 (91 to 110). Conscious level: alert scores 0. Temperature 38.2 scores 1 (38.1 to 39.0). The aggregate NEWS2 is 2 plus 1 plus 0 plus 1 plus 1 plus 0 plus 1, which is 6.[1]

A NEWS2 of 5 to 6 is the key escalation threshold. It mandates an urgent review by a clinician with competencies in the assessment of acute illness and an active consideration of a critical-care referral, with an increase in the frequency of observations. This is not a low-risk observation patient: he is at the threshold at which escalation is clearly indicated.[1]

[3]The clinical context is sepsis from a respiratory source. The response runs in parallel with the escalation: a structured ABCDE assessment, oxygen titrated to target, intravenous access with bloods including lactate and cultures, early broad-spectrum antibiotics within the first hour, a balanced crystalloid bolus for the relative hypotension and tachycardia with reassessment, and serial early-warning scoring. The lactate and the trend determine whether this becomes a critical-care admission. The score triggered the review; the review must trigger the bundle.

Emergency Medicine Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this SAQ. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Emergency Medicine fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References3ShowHide
  1. [1]Smith GB, Redfern OC, Pimentel MA, et al. The National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2). Clin Med (Lond), 2019.PMID 31092526
  2. [2]Seymour CW, Liu VX, Iwashyna TJ, et al. Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA, 2016.PMID 26903335
  3. [3]Gao H, McDonnell A, Harrison DA, et al. Systematic review and evaluation of physiological track and trigger warning systems for identifying at-risk patients on the ward Intensive Care Med, 2007.PMID 17318499
Emergency Medicine Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Emergency Medicine library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousNEAT decline — Donabedian, run chart and PDSAQuality and ED metricsNextNon-invasive ventilation for COPDNon-invasive ventilation