EM SAQs · Recognition of deterioration (track and trigger)
NEWS2 calculation and the escalation response
An ACEM-style short-answer question on calculating the NEWS2 and acting on the key escalation threshold, with model answer, common errors and examiner notes.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
Model answer
Reveal model answerShowHide
Score each parameter in turn. Respiratory rate 22 scores 2 (21 to 24). Oxygen saturation 94 percent on air, using scale 1, scores 1 (94 to 95). Supplemental oxygen: air scores 0. Systolic blood pressure 104 scores 1 (101 to 110). Pulse 102 scores 1 (91 to 110). Conscious level: alert scores 0. Temperature 38.2 scores 1 (38.1 to 39.0). The aggregate NEWS2 is 2 plus 1 plus 0 plus 1 plus 1 plus 0 plus 1, which is 6.[1]
A NEWS2 of 5 to 6 is the key escalation threshold. It mandates an urgent review by a clinician with competencies in the assessment of acute illness and an active consideration of a critical-care referral, with an increase in the frequency of observations. This is not a low-risk observation patient: he is at the threshold at which escalation is clearly indicated.[1]
[3]The clinical context is sepsis from a respiratory source. The response runs in parallel with the escalation: a structured ABCDE assessment, oxygen titrated to target, intravenous access with bloods including lactate and cultures, early broad-spectrum antibiotics within the first hour, a balanced crystalloid bolus for the relative hypotension and tachycardia with reassessment, and serial early-warning scoring. The lactate and the trend determine whether this becomes a critical-care admission. The score triggered the review; the review must trigger the bundle.
References3ShowHide
- [1]Smith GB, Redfern OC, Pimentel MA, et al. The National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2). Clin Med (Lond), 2019.PMID 31092526
- [2]Seymour CW, Liu VX, Iwashyna TJ, et al. Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA, 2016.PMID 26903335
- [3]Gao H, McDonnell A, Harrison DA, et al. Systematic review and evaluation of physiological track and trigger warning systems for identifying at-risk patients on the ward Intensive Care Med, 2007.PMID 17318499