Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

EM SAQsPOCUS — FAST and E-FAST

EM SAQs · POCUS — FAST and E-FAST

FAST disposition matrix in blunt trauma

ACEM-style SAQ on FAST technique, accuracy, and disposition.

10 marks10 min1 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

ACEMFRCEMABEM
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

ACEMFRCEMABEM
Prompt
Describe the four standard FAST views, approximate sensitivity/specificity, E-FAST additions, and the disposition rules for positive/negative FAST crossed with stable/unstable physiology. Include two false-negative causes. (10 marks)

Model answer

Reveal model answerShowHide

Four views: hepatorenal, splenorenal, pelvic (pouch of Douglas/rectovesical; decompress bladder first), subxiphoid pericardium — extended with bilateral anterior chest and IVC assessment, imaged in a fixed order so no window is missed. Accuracy: for abdominal trauma POCS sensitivity 0.68 with specificity 0.95; for chest injuries 0.96 and 0.99 — rule-in, not rule-out; a single negative misses injuries at 28% prevalence.[2]

Disposition matrix — confirm thresholds against local trauma protocol:

  • Positive + unstable → theatre + MTP + TXA (not CT)
  • Positive + stable → CT for organ grading
  • Negative + unstable → not clearance; seek pelvic/retroperitoneal/thoracic sources; repeat FAST; theatre/angio if not stabilising
  • Negative + stable → observe, serial exam/FAST, CT if mechanism/exam warrants

False negatives: retroperitoneal bleed; pelvic-only bleed; hollow viscus early; early scan before fluid accumulates; obesity/subcut emphysema technical failure — these explain missed injuries at prevalence in the held review.[2]

Emergency Medicine Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this SAQ. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Emergency Medicine fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References2ShowHide
  1. [1]Nishijima DK, Simel DL, Wisner DH, Holmes JF. Does this adult patient have a blunt intra-abdominal injury? JAMA, 2012.PMID 22496266
  2. [2]Stengel D, et al. Point-of-care ultrasonography for diagnosing thoracoabdominal injuries in patients with blunt trauma. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2018.PMID 30548249
Emergency Medicine Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Emergency Medicine library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousFailed ED-to-ICU handover — ISBAR and system fixHandover (ISBAR)NextFebrile infant — SBI risk and workupPaediatric fever and serious bacterial illness