Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

EM SAQsFluid resuscitation

EM SAQs · Fluid resuscitation

Fluid resuscitation — balanced crystalloid, responsiveness and the SMART evidence

ACEM SAQ on SMART/SAFE/HES evidence and dynamic fluid responsiveness.

15 marks15 min1 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

ACEMFRCEMABEM
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

ACEMFRCEMABEM
Prompt
A 68-year-old man with community-acquired pneumonia is hypotensive (BP 82/48, HR 118, lactate 4.8 mmol/L). Discuss fluid choice with key trial evidence (5 marks), how you assess fluid responsiveness before further boluses (5 marks), and disease-specific caveats including trauma brain injury and starch (5 marks).

Model answer

Reveal model answerShowHide

Fluid choice (5 marks). Default is a balanced crystalloid (Hartmanns/Plasma-Lyte). SMART showed balanced crystalloids reduce major adverse kidney events versus saline in critically ill adults; large saline loads cause hyperchloraemic metabolic acidosis and renal vasoconstriction. Early sepsis boluses are given in 250–500 mL aliquots toward a working ~30 mL/kg rescue while starting source control and antibiotics, with early noradrenaline if profound vasoplegia.[1]

Responsiveness (5 marks). Only about half of unstable patients are fluid-responsive (56 per cent in pooled dynamic-test data). I use passive leg raise from the semi-recumbent position (best dynamic test in spontaneous breathing), pulse-pressure variation if fully adapted on controlled ventilation, IVC variability with caveats, and clinical endpoints (MAP, lactate trend, urine output, capillary refill). I stop boluses when non-responsive to avoid oedema harm.[4][5]

Caveats (5 marks). Hydroxyethyl starch is abandoned (CHEST/6S — more AKI/RRT, no mortality benefit). Albumin is harmful in TBI (SAFE-TBI higher mortality) — never give albumin to the head-injured. In bleeding trauma minimise crystalloid, give blood products and use permissive hypotension when appropriate (delayed fluids improved survival in penetrating torso injury). Saline remains niche (e.g. first-hour DKA sodium need).[2][3][6][7]

Emergency Medicine Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this SAQ. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Emergency Medicine fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References7ShowHide
  1. [1]Semler MW, Self WH, Rice TW Balanced crystalloids versus saline in critically ill adults (SMART). New England Journal of Medicine, 2018.PMID 29768150
  2. [2]Myburgh J, Cooper DJ, Finfer S, et al. Saline or albumin for fluid resuscitation in patients with traumatic brain injury. New England Journal of Medicine, 2007.PMID 17761591
  3. [3]Myburgh JA, Finfer S, Bellomo R, et al. Hydroxyethyl starch or saline for fluid resuscitation in intensive care (CHEST). New England Journal of Medicine, 2012.PMID 23075127
  4. [4]Jabot J, Teboul JL, Richard C, Monnet X. Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: importance of the postural change. Intensive Care Medicine, 2009.PMID 18795254
  5. [5]Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature Crit Care Med, 2009.PMID 19602972
  6. [6]Perner A, Haase N, Guttormsen AB, et al. Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 versus Ringer's acetate in severe sepsis N Engl J Med, 2012.PMID 22738085
  7. [7]Bickell WH, Wall MJ Jr, Pepe PE, et al. Immediate versus delayed fluid resuscitation for hypotensive patients with penetrating torso injuries N Engl J Med, 1994.PMID 7935634
Emergency Medicine Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Emergency Medicine library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousFirst seizure — assessment, investigation and dispositionSeizures and first fitNextFragmented handover, fixation error and the debrief — CRM in the resuscitationTeam-based care and CRM