Derm Cases · Dermatology / Diagnostic bedside tests
OSCE — Wood lamp examination of intertrigo, hypopigmentation, and scalp scale
An 8-minute OSCE on dark-room Wood lamp technique, classic fluorescence colour map (erythrasma, pityriasis versicolor, Microsporum hair), non-fluorescent Trichophyton trap, false positives, and when to confirm with KOH, culture, or porphyria labs.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
NEET-PGINICETPLABMRCPFRCDerm
Prompt
An 8-minute OSCE on dark-room Wood lamp technique, classic fluorescence colour map (erythrasma, pityriasis versicolor, Microsporum hair), non-fluorescent Trichophyton trap, false positives, and when to confirm with KOH, culture, or porphyria labs.
Brief (to candidate)
You have a hand-held Wood lamp and a patient with axillary discolouration, truncal hypopigmented scale, and a child contact with scalp scale. In 8 minutes, demonstrate and explain Wood-lamp examination and interpret likely patterns to the examiner.
Candidate instructions
- State UVA / ~365 nm principle and dark-room setup.
- Describe skin preparation (clean, dry, no makeup/lint).
- Map coral-red → erythrasma, yellow-gold → versicolor, green hair → Microsporum.
- Explain why negative scalp fluorescence does not exclude tinea capitis.
- Name one false-positive source and one confirmatory test pathway.
- Mention vitiligo blue-white mapping or urine porphyrin caveat if asked.
Examiner checklist (mark each domain / 10)
| Domain | Key actions expected |
|---|---|
| Physics/setup | Long-wave UVA; darkness; distance; eye safety awareness[1][2] |
| Erythrasma | Coral-red flexures as classic clue[4][3] |
| Versicolor | Yellow-gold scale adjunct to KOH |
| Tinea capitis trap | Non-fluorescent Trichophyton still possible[5] |
| Artefacts | Fibres/topicals/soap false glow[1] |
| Limits | Adjunct only; confirm infection/porphyria as needed |
Model key actions
- Demonstrate dark-room technique verbally if physical darkening unavailable.
- Give colour table cleanly without over-calling melanoma diagnosis from lamp alone.
Common errors
- Claiming negative lamp excludes all tinea capitis.
- Skipping dark-room requirement.
- Treating every fluorescence as pathognomonic without KOH/culture.
References5ShowHide
- [1]Asawanonda P, Taylor CR. Wood's light in dermatology. International Journal of Dermatology, 1999.PMID 10583611
- [2]Klatte JL, van der Beek N, Kemperman PM. 100 years of Wood's lamp revised. JEADV, 2015.PMID 25428804
- [3]Gomez-Martinez S, et al. Wood's Light in Inflammatory and Autoimmune Dermatoses, Infections and Skin Cancer. Actas Dermosifiliogr, 2025.PMID 39722344
- [4]Radhakrishnan S, et al. Erythrasma: a systematic review of interventions. Clin Exp Dermatol, 2025.PMID 40635638
- [5]Prevost E. The rise and fall of fluorescent tinea capitis. Pediatr Dermatol, 1983.PMID 6680181