Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Cardio Casespulmonary-circulation

Cardio Cases · pulmonary-circulation

Intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism — case discussion

Practice case on normotensive pulmonary embolism with right ventricular dysfunction and a raised troponin under the 2019 ESC guideline, with 2026 AHA/ACC advice on duration: risk classification, anticoagulation and monitoring, the role of thrombolysis, rescue reperfusion, oral anticoagulant choice, duration and follow-up.

practice case discussion (not a real patient)3 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

  • EECC
  • ABIM Cardiovascular Disease Certification
  • consultant-call scenario
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

  • EECC
  • ABIM Cardiovascular Disease Certification
  • consultant-call scenario
Prompt
A 46-year-old woman taking a combined oral contraceptive presents with 2 days of breathlessness. This is her first venous thromboembolism. Heart rate 112/min, blood pressure 122/78 mmHg, sustained since arrival with no hypotension at any point; oxygen saturation 92% on air; she is alert and warm. Her simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (sPESI) is 1 (heart rate 110/min or more). CT pulmonary angiography confirms bilateral pulmonary embolism with a right/left ventricular diameter ratio of 1.2, and her troponin I is raised. She is not pregnant or breastfeeding, has normal renal function, no known antiphospholipid antibody syndrome and no bleeding risk factors.

Objectives

  1. Classify normotensive pulmonary embolism (PE) with right ventricular (RV) dysfunction and a raised troponin, and plan monitoring and a rescue strategy (ESC 2019).[1]
  2. Choose anticoagulation and plan its duration and follow-up.

Candidate brief

Practice case discussion; this is not a real patient. You are the cardiology registrar asked to see her in the emergency department. In 15 minutes, give your risk assessment, your plan for the first 72 hours, and what you would do if she deteriorated.

Expected actions

  • Classify. She has no haemodynamic instability, so she is not high risk; in the intermediate-risk group, with RV dysfunction on CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and a raised troponin, she is intermediate-high risk (ESC 2019), and close monitoring is recommended to permit early detection of decompensation.[1]
  • Anticoagulate. Start low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), which ESC 2019 recommends over unfractionated heparin (UFH) for most patients if anticoagulation is started parenterally (Class I, level A); ESC 2019 says it appears reasonable to leave intermediate-high-risk patients on LMWH over the first 2–3 days and ensure they remain stable before switching to oral anticoagulation.[1][2]
  • Do not lyse routinely. ESC 2019: routine use of primary systemic thrombolysis is not recommended in intermediate- or low-risk PE (Class III, level B; footnote: the risk-to-benefit ratios of surgical embolectomy or catheter-directed procedures have not yet been established in intermediate- or low-risk PE).[2]
  • Plan ahead. ESC key message: for intermediate-high-risk PE, plan the management strategy with your team prospectively, so a contingency plan is ready if she deteriorates; ESC 2019 also says that set-up of a multidisciplinary team and a programme for the management of high- and (in selected cases) intermediate-risk PE should be considered, depending on the resources and expertise available in each hospital (Class IIa, level C).[1][2]
  • If she deteriorates. ESC 2019: rescue thrombolytic therapy is recommended for haemodynamic deterioration on anticoagulation (Class I, level B); surgical embolectomy or catheter-directed treatment should be considered as an alternative (Class IIa, level C), if appropriate expertise and resources are available on-site.[2]
  • Oral anticoagulation. Once stable, if she is eligible, a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) is recommended in preference to a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) (ESC 2019, Class I, level A); NOACs are not recommended in severe renal impairment, pregnancy and lactation, or antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (Class III, level C), none of which applies to her (the row footnote defines severe renal impairment by drug: dabigatran is not recommended with creatinine clearance (CrCl) under 30 mL/min; edoxaban 30 mg once daily at CrCl 15–50 mL/min and not recommended under 15 mL/min; rivaroxaban and apixaban with caution at 15–29 mL/min and not recommended under 15 mL/min).[2]
  • Duration and follow-up. Therapeutic anticoagulation for 3 months or more is recommended (ESC 2019, Class I, level A), and routine clinical evaluation 3–6 months after the PE (for symptoms suggesting recurrence, bleeding, malignancy, or persistent or new-onset exercise limitation, and to decide on extension of anticoagulant treatment) is recommended (Class I, level B). The 2026 AHA/ACC guideline lists oestrogen therapy (hormone replacement or contraceptive) as a minor reversible risk factor, and after a first PE due to a minor reversible risk factor, shared decision-making about stopping anticoagulation at the end of the initial treatment phase (3–6 months) versus continuing into the extended phase is reasonable, to optimise the net clinical benefit of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) versus bleeding (class of recommendation [COR] 2a, level of evidence [LOE] B-NR).[2][3]

Marking

Pass:

  • Classifies her as intermediate-high risk from RV dysfunction plus a raised troponin without haemodynamic instability.[1]
  • Gives anticoagulation with monitoring and reserves thrombolysis for haemodynamic deterioration.[1][2]

Fail:

  • Gives routine primary systemic thrombolysis to a normotensive patient with intermediate-risk PE.[2]
  • Discharges her home on day 1 as low risk.[1][2]
References3ShowHide
  1. [1]Konstantinides SV, Meyer G, Becattini C, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Heart J, 2020.PMID 31504429
  2. [2]Konstantinides SV, Meyer G, Becattini C, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Respir J, 2019.PMID 31473594
  3. [3]Creager MA, Barnes GD, Giri J, et al. 2026 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ACEP/CHEST/SCAI/SHM/SIR/SVM/SVN Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2026.PMID 41712898
PreviousIdiopathic PAH in a young woman — case discussionpulmonary-circulationNextPost-operative high-risk PE with a contraindication to thrombolysis — case discussionpulmonary-circulation