Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Cardio Casespulmonary-circulation

Cardio Cases · pulmonary-circulation

Post-operative high-risk PE with a contraindication to thrombolysis — case discussion

Practice case: a 63-year-old woman with high-risk PE 8 days after knee replacement; ESC 2019 Table 4 and Table 10, RV support, the ESC 2019 surgery and catheter rows and AHA/ACC 2026 Category E1 rows, deterioration to Category E2 and VA-ECMO, the PE response team, and the switch to oral anticoagulation.

practice case discussion (not a real patient)3 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

  • EECC
  • ABIM Cardiovascular Disease Certification
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

  • EECC
  • ABIM Cardiovascular Disease Certification
Prompt
A 63-year-old woman, 8 days after a knee replacement, has acute PE with persistent hypotension, confusion, cold clammy skin and a raised lactate, and a dilated, hypokinetic RV on bedside TTE.

Presentation

Practice case (not a real patient). A 63-year-old woman is on day 8 after an elective total knee replacement in a metropolitan Australian hospital with on-site cardiothoracic surgery, a catheter-directed PE service and an ECMO team, each with appropriate expertise and resources. She becomes acutely breathless. Her systolic blood pressure is 80-86 mmHg for 20 minutes despite adequate filling, with no arrhythmia, bleeding or sepsis; she is confused, her skin is cold and clammy, and her lactate is raised.[1] Bedside TTE shows a dilated, hypokinetic RV, and CTPA confirms bilateral main pulmonary artery PE.[1]

Step 1 — Name the problem

Discussion:

  • She has high-risk PE: persistent hypotension with end-organ hypoperfusion meets ESC 2019 Table 4, and with PE confirmed on CTPA neither PESI nor troponin is needed to classify her.[1]
  • In AHA/ACC 2026 terms, recurrent or persistent hypotension with cardiogenic shock is Category E1, compatible with SCAI SHOCK stage C.[3]
  • ESC 2019 calls acute RV failure with low systemic output the leading cause of death in high-risk PE.[1]

Step 2 — Support the right ventricle

  • ESC 2019: anticoagulation with UFH, including a weight-adjusted bolus, is recommended without delay in high-risk PE (Class I, Level C).[2]
  • Fluid: ESC 2019 text says a modest (≤500 mL) fluid challenge can be used if central venous pressure is low, as it may increase the cardiac index, and warns that volume loading has the potential to over-distend the RV.[1]
  • Pressors: ESC 2019 says norepinephrine and/or dobutamine should be considered in high-risk PE (Class IIa, Level C); AHA/ACC 2026 recommends vasopressors and/or inotropes for cardiogenic shock due to PE (Categories D2-E2) to improve cardiac output and systemic perfusion (COR 1, LOE C-LD).[2][3]
  • Airway: AHA/ACC 2026 says deep sedation and mechanical ventilation should not be performed in Categories C-E unless clinically indicated, to avoid haemodynamic collapse (COR 3: Harm, LOE C-LD), and that vasopressors, inotropes and/or VA-ECMO should be available if sedation for intubation is needed (COR 1, LOE C-LD).[3]

Step 3 — Choose the reperfusion

  • Her knee replacement 8 days ago is major surgery within the previous 3 weeks, an absolute contraindication to fibrinolysis in ESC 2019 Table 10.[1]
  • ESC 2019: in high-risk PE with thrombolysis contraindicated, surgical pulmonary embolectomy is recommended (Class I, Level C) and percutaneous catheter-directed treatment should be considered (Class IIa, Level C), if appropriate expertise and resources are available on-site, which they are.[2]
  • AHA/ACC 2026: in Category E1, surgical embolectomy compared with anticoagulation alone (COR 2a, LOE B-NR) and MT plus anticoagulation over anticoagulation alone (COR 2a, LOE B-NR) are reasonable to prevent further clinical decompensation and acute mortality.[3]
  • The PE response team decides between the surgical and catheter options with the on-site teams; AHA/ACC 2026 recommends a PERT assessment in Categories C-E to improve in-hospital clinical care delivery (COR 1, LOE B-NR).[3][1]

Step 4 — She deteriorates

Before the procedure starts she develops refractory cardiogenic shock (SCAI stage D) despite norepinephrine and dobutamine, without cardiac arrest.[3]

  • This is AHA/ACC 2026 Category E2; instituting VA-ECMO is reasonable, provided appropriate resources are available, to stabilise haemodynamics and improve oxygenation (COR 2a, LOE B-NR).[3]
  • ESC 2019: ECMO may be considered in combination with surgical embolectomy or catheter-directed treatment in PE with refractory circulatory collapse or cardiac arrest (Class IIb, Level C), if appropriate expertise and resources are available on-site, which they are; its text calls stand-alone ECMO with anticoagulation controversial.[2][1]
  • AHA/ACC 2026: in Category E2 not on mechanical circulatory support, surgical embolectomy is not recommended over other advanced therapies for preventing short-term mortality (COR 3: No Benefit, LOE B-NR); on VA-ECMO, the usefulness of additional advanced therapies is not well established (COR 2b, LOE C-LD).[3]
  • On VA-ECMO, AHA/ACC 2026 recommends continuing parenteral systemic anticoagulation in the absence of bleeding to prevent further thrombotic or embolic complications (COR 1, LOE B-NR).[3]

Step 5 — After stabilisation

  • ESC 2019 text: after reperfusion and haemodynamic stabilisation, patients recovering from high-risk PE can be switched to oral anticoagulation, with the timing based on clinical judgement because they were excluded from the phase III NOAC trials.[1]
  • ESC 2019 text: it remains unclear whether early thrombolysis for (intermediate- or high-risk) acute PE affects symptoms, functional limitation or CTEPH at long-term follow-up.[1]

Examiner pitfalls

  • Giving thrombolysis despite major surgery within the previous 3 weeks (an absolute contraindication in ESC 2019 Table 10).[1]
  • Intubating for convenience: AHA/ACC 2026 says deep sedation and mechanical ventilation should not be performed in Categories C-E, unless clinically indicated, to avoid haemodynamic collapse (COR 3: Harm, LOE C-LD).[3]
  • Transferring an unstable (Category E) patient to another medical centre before stabilisation (AHA/ACC 2026, COR 3: Harm, LOE C-EO).[3]
References3ShowHide
  1. [1]Konstantinides SV, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Heart J, 2020.PMID 31504429
  2. [2]Konstantinides SV, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Respir J, 2019.PMID 31473594
  3. [3]Creager MA, et al. 2026 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ACEP/CHEST/SCAI/SHM/SIR/SVM/SVN Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2026.PMID 41712898
PreviousIntermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism — case discussionpulmonary-circulationNextInferior STEMI at a non-PCI centre — case discussionischaemic-heart-disease