Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Anaes VivasAirway management

Anaes Vivas · Airway management

Data viva — first- versus second-generation supraglottic airway devices

A data viva on the comparative table of supraglottic airway devices. Covers the first- versus second-generation distinction (the gastric drainage channel and the higher seal pressure), the i-gel non-inflatable cuff, the intubating LMA as a fibreoptic-guided conduit for intubation, the uses (routine, guideline rescue, bridge, CPR and prehospital, paediatric), the disadvantages and contraindications, and the guideline rescue decision that turns on oxygenation.

data4 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

ANZCAFRCAABAEDAICFCAIFCA_SA
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

ANZCAFRCAABAEDAICFCAIFCA_SA
Prompt
A four-column table comparing supraglottic airway devices. Column 1: the classic LMA (inflatable cuff, single airway tube, no gastric channel, lowest seal of the family). Column 2: the ProSeal LMA (deeper posterior cuff, gastric drainage tube, higher seal). Column 3: the LMA Supreme (rigid curved single-use tube, gastric channel). Column 4: the i-gel (non-inflatable thermoplastic elastomer cuff, integral gastric channel). Each column shows a cross-section of the device seated over the laryngeal inlet with the cuff highlighted and the gastric tube drawn where present. A footnote arrow marks the intubating LMA (Fastrach) as a separate conduit device.

Stimulus

A four-column table comparing the supraglottic airway devices the candidate is expected to know together. Each column shows a cross-section of the device seated over the laryngeal inlet, with the cuff highlighted and the gastric tube drawn where present. Column 1 is the classic LMA (first generation): an inflatable silicone cuff, a single airway tube, NO gastric drainage channel, and the lowest seal pressure of the family. Columns 2 to 4 are the second-generation devices: the ProSeal LMA (a deeper posterior cuff plus a separate gastric drainage tube, higher seal), the LMA Supreme (a rigid, curved, single-use tube with a gastric channel), and the i-gel (a non-inflatable cuff with an integral gastric channel). A footnote arrow marks the intubating LMA (Fastrach) as a separate conduit device, not shown in the main table.

Anaesthesia Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this viva. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Anaesthesia fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References10ShowHide
  1. [1]Yin X, et al. Gastric tube placement through the drainage channel of second-generation supraglottic airway devices. Front Surg, 2026.PMID 42344572
  2. [2]Migliorelli S, et al. Clinical Evaluation of a Non-inflatable Visual Laryngeal Mask Airway. Cureus, 2026.PMID 42291977
  3. [3]Gan Z, et al. The Median Effective Concentration of Sevoflurane for I-Gel LMA Insertion in Children. Pediatr Discov, 2026.PMID 42021953
  4. [4]Black KM, et al. Anesthesia Care, Complications, and Airway Management for Spinal Muscular Atrophy. Anesth Analg, 2026.PMID 42363899
  5. [5]Ghaffar S, et al. Physiological difficult airway management in the emergency department. JPMA, 2026.PMID 42363338
  6. [6]Frerk C, et al. Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults. Br J Anaesth, 2015.PMID 26556848
  7. [7]Cook TM, et al. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 2: intensive care and emergency departments. Br J Anaesth, 2011.PMID 21447489
  8. [8]Lai CJ, et al. Comparison of the efficacy of supraglottic airway devices in low-risk adult patients: a network meta-analysis and systematic review. Sci Rep, 2021.PMID 34301986
  9. [9]Mihara T, et al. A network meta-analysis of the clinical properties of various types of supraglottic airway device in children. Anaesthesia, 2017.PMID 28737223
  10. [10]Lim WY, et al. Awake supraglottic airway guided flexible bronchoscopic intubation in patients with anticipated difficult airways. Korean J Anesthesiol, 2019.PMID 31475506
Anaesthesia Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Anaesthesia library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousData viva — Cormack-Lehane grade, BURP and the capnography confirmationAirway managementNextData viva — Mallampati class versus Cormack-Lehane gradeAirway management