Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Anaes TopicsAirway management

Anaes · Airway management

Airway assessment: the LEMON tool, Mallampati classification & prediction of difficult direct laryngoscopy

Also known as LEMON assessment · Mallampati classification · Mallampati score · Cormack-Lehane grade · Difficult airway prediction · 3-3-2 rule · Wilson score · El-Ganzouri index

Pre-operative airway assessment is the single bedside exercise most consistently examined in the airway viva and short-answer question, because it is the one step that converts an unanticipated crisis into a planned event. The framework rests on four ideas: a small set of anatomical axes — mouth opening, mandibular space, laryngeal position, neck mobility — determines whether a direct line of sight from the incisors to the glottis can be made; the LEMON tool (Look externally, Evaluate the 3-3-2, Mallampati, Obstruction, Neck mobility) packages those axes into a reproducible screen; the Mallampati classification grades the oropharyngeal view and correlates, imperfectly, with the Cormack-Lehane laryngoscopic grade that defines a difficult intubation; and the honest limitation — individual bedside tests have poor positive predictive value, so combined multi-factor scores are used and the assessment exists to inform preparation, not to guarantee prediction. Anchored to contemporary evidence spanning syndromic and physiological difficult airways, the optimisation of video-laryngoscopic intubating conditions, the bronchoscopic management of dynamic airway obstruction, and the airway compromise of anaphylaxis. Built on the Mallampati original prospective study (n=210), the Cormack-Lehane obstetric grading paper, the Shiga bedside-test meta-analysis (35 studies, 50,760 patients), the MACOCHA ICU score derivation and validation (1,000 plus 400 intubations), the modified-LEMON trauma correlation study (n=114), and the El-Ganzouri multivariate risk index (n=10,507).

high12 referencesUpdated 26 July 202614 min readVerification in progress

Practise this topic

  • 8 MCQs

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic8 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

ANZCAFRCAABAEDAICFCAIFCA_SA

Red flags

  • No single bedside test predicts the difficult airway reliably — pooled sensitivity is only 20-62% per test. A reassuring assessment is never a reason to skip preparation; behave as though every induction may be difficult.
  • Signs of upper airway obstruction — stridor at rest, a muffled ('hot-potato') voice, hoarseness, drooling, or a neck mass — mark a threatened airway that can collapse completely on induction. These patients are candidates for an awake fibreoptic technique, not a rapid sequence induction.
  • A limited mouth opening, a short thyromental distance, or a short, immobile neck each raise the odds of a poor laryngoscopic view; combined, they warrant a video laryngoscope and a senior operator from the outset.
  • The physiological difficult airway — hypoxaemia, hypotension, acidosis, shock — is dangerous independently of the anatomy; the same patient who is anatomically easy can be physiologically impossible, and resuscitation precedes, accompanies and follows the intubation.
  • Cormack-Lehane grade 3 or 4 IS the difficult direct laryngoscopy the assessment tries to predict; when it is encountered unanticipated, declare it early, optimise position and external laryngeal manipulation, and move to a video laryngoscope or a supraglottic rescue rather than repeating a failing attempt.
On this page
Study tools

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic8 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

ANZCAFRCAABAEDAICFCAIFCA_SA

Red flags

  • No single bedside test predicts the difficult airway reliably — pooled sensitivity is only 20-62% per test. A reassuring assessment is never a reason to skip preparation; behave as though every induction may be difficult.
  • Signs of upper airway obstruction — stridor at rest, a muffled ('hot-potato') voice, hoarseness, drooling, or a neck mass — mark a threatened airway that can collapse completely on induction. These patients are candidates for an awake fibreoptic technique, not a rapid sequence induction.
  • A limited mouth opening, a short thyromental distance, or a short, immobile neck each raise the odds of a poor laryngoscopic view; combined, they warrant a video laryngoscope and a senior operator from the outset.
  • The physiological difficult airway — hypoxaemia, hypotension, acidosis, shock — is dangerous independently of the anatomy; the same patient who is anatomically easy can be physiologically impossible, and resuscitation precedes, accompanies and follows the intubation.
  • Cormack-Lehane grade 3 or 4 IS the difficult direct laryngoscopy the assessment tries to predict; when it is encountered unanticipated, declare it early, optimise position and external laryngeal manipulation, and move to a video laryngoscope or a supraglottic rescue rather than repeating a failing attempt.
The one-line answer

Pre-operative airway assessment predicts the difficult direct laryngoscopy before you meet it, packaging four anatomical axes into the LEMON tool — Look externally, Evaluate the 3-3-2, Mallampati, Obstruction, Neck mobility. The outcome it tries to predict is the Cormack-Lehane grade (grade 3 — epiglottis seen but not the cords — is the main cause of trouble).[8] The honest position, from a meta-analysis of 35 studies and 50,760 patients, is that no single bedside test predicts reliably (sensitivity 20–62% per test; combinations add only incremental value),[9] so the assessment exists to inform preparation, not to abolish risk — and stridor at rest means an awake fibreoptic intubation, not a rapid sequence.[2]

Meet the patient

A 60-year-old man with a large multinodular goitre and a retrognathic chin presents for elective thyroidectomy. He has no stridor at rest but a muffled voice. The question every assessment is built to answer: will I see his cords at laryngoscopy, and if not, what is my plan before I give the induction agent?[2]

Hold the three ideas that run through the whole topic: direct laryngoscopy needs a straight line of sight from incisors to glottis, set by a few distances and ranges; the LEMON tool (Look-Evaluate-Mallampati-Obstruction-Neck mobility) packages those axes into a fast bedside screen for the emergency setting;[11] and the assessment's job is to trigger preparation (equipment, technique, senior help, a failed-intubation plan) — because a proportion of difficult airways arrive unannounced no matter how careful the assessment.[9]

Anaesthesia Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this topic. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Anaesthesia fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References12ShowHide
  1. [1]Black KM, et al. Anesthesia Care, Complications, and Airway Management for Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Retrospective Chart Review From a Quaternary Children's Hospital Anesth Analg, 2026.PMID 42363899
  2. [2]Ghaffar S, et al. Physiological difficult airway management in the emergency department J Pak Med Assoc, 2026.PMID 42363338
  3. [3]Ipsen EO, et al. Remifentanil Versus Rocuronium for Optimising Video Laryngoscopy Assisted Tracheal Intubation-The ROCVIDEO Trial Protocol Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2026.PMID 42304626
  4. [4]Schramm D, et al. Bronchoscopic and interventional management of tracheobronchomalacia in children with bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a review of evidence Paediatr Respir Rev, 2026.PMID 42364941
  5. [5]Shionoya M, et al. Comparison of the Effects of Remimazolam and Propofol, With Epinephrine-containing Lidocaine, on Rocuronium-induced Muscle Relaxation Anesth Prog, 2026.PMID 42307548
  6. [6]Baba T, et al. A Case of Clinically Suspected Kounis Syndrome Associated with Platelet Transfusion during Thoracoscopic Right Lower Lobectomy Surg Case Rep, 2026.PMID 42359366
  7. [7]Mallampati SR, et al. A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective study. Can Anaesth Soc J, 1985.PMID 4027773
  8. [8]Cormack RS, et al. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia, 1984.PMID 6507827
  9. [9]Shiga T, et al. Predicting difficult intubation in apparently normal patients: a meta-analysis of bedside screening test performance. Anesthesiology, 2005.PMID 16052126
  10. [10]De Jong A, et al. Early identification of patients at risk for difficult intubation in the intensive care unit: development and validation of the MACOCHA score in a multicenter cohort study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2013.PMID 23348979
  11. [11]Ji SM, et al. Correlation between modified LEMON score and intubation difficulty in adult trauma patients undergoing emergency surgery. World J Emerg Surg, 2018.PMID 30061919
  12. [12]El-Ganzouri AR, et al. Preoperative airway assessment: predictive value of a multivariate risk index. Anesth Analg, 1996.PMID 8638791

Test yourself

Practise what you just read

  • 8 MCQs
Anaesthesia Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Anaesthesia library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousVasopressinAnaesthetic adjunctsNextAirway emergencies: recognition and the structured responseAirway management