Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Anaes SAQsVascular anaesthesia

Anaes SAQs · Vascular anaesthesia

Carotid endarterectomy: GA versus awake and cerebral monitoring

Final-examination SAQ for carotid-endarterectomy-anaesthesia.

15 marks10 min1 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

ANZCAFRCAEDAICABAFCAI
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

ANZCAFRCAEDAICABAFCAI
Prompt
Symptomatic carotid stenosis for CEA. Discuss GA vs awake with reference to GALA and intraoperative ischaemia management.

Model answer

GALA (5). 3,526 patients, primary composite 4.8% general vs 4.5% local (RR 0.94) — no significant difference; individualise by patient, surgeon, and monitoring strength.[1]

Monitoring (5). Awake neuro exam (taught gold standard) vs EEG/TCD/stump surrogates; shunt selectively by monitor — stump series used below 30 mmHg with no consensus, surgeon preference governs.[1][4]

BP (5). MAP at or above baseline during clamp to drive collaterals (taught); tight postoperative control against hyperperfusion (impaired autoregulation, fatal after haemorrhage); neck-haematoma airway plan with bedside opening if stridor (taught).[5]

Anaesthesia Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this SAQ. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Anaesthesia fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References5ShowHide
  1. [1]Lewis SC, Warlow CP, Bodenham AR, et al. General anaesthesia versus local anaesthesia for carotid surgery (GALA): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2008.PMID 19041130
  2. [2]Lee TH, Marcantonio ER, Mangione CM, et al. Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery. Circulation, 1999.PMID 10477528
  3. [3]Devereaux PJ, Yang H, Yusuf S, et al. Effects of extended-release metoprolol succinate in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery (POISE trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2008.PMID 18479744
  4. [4]Chia MC, Wallace GA, Cheng BT, et al. Identifying a Safe Carotid Stump Pressure Threshold for Selective Shunting During Carotid Endarterectomy. Ann Vasc Surg, 2020.PMID 32554199
  5. [5]Moulakakis KG, Mylonas SN, Sfyroeras GS, et al. Hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid revascularization. J Vasc Surg, 2009.PMID 19249185
Anaesthesia Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Anaesthesia library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousAortic cross-clamp physiology: clamp-on and clamp-offVascular anaesthesiaNextPerioperative cardiac risk: Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI)Vascular anaesthesia