MBBS OSCE · Endocrinology / General Medicine
OSCE — assessment and management plan for a newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic with the diabetic foot
An 8-minute OSCE station assessing the candidate's structured assessment of a 60-year-old with type 2 diabetes and a new foot ulcer — foot examination (pulses, 10-g monofilament sensation), recognition of the diabetic foot emergency, and a management plan including the glycaemic/blood-pressure/lipid ladder with drug doses.
On this page
Study tools
Exam tags
Brief (to candidate)
A 60-year-old man with a 10-year history of type 2 diabetes (currently on metformin and gliclazide) presents with a painful ulcer on the plantar surface of the right great toe for 5 days. He also reports two months of intermittent calf claudication. HbA1c 9.1 percent, BMI 30 kg/m², BP 150/88, eGFR 60 mL/min/1.73 m².[1] You have 8 minutes to assess him (including the foot), recognise the urgency, and outline a management plan with named drugs and doses.
Candidate instructions
- Take a focused, structured history and examine the diabetic foot in a structured way.[3]
- Identify and grade the foot problem (neuropathic vs ischaemic vs infected) and state the urgency.
- Outline the glycaemic, blood-pressure and lipid management, including drug doses and escalation triggers.
- State your disposition (urgent multidisciplinary foot-team referral, admission criteria) and safety-net advice.
Examiner checklist (mark each domain / 10)
| Domain | Key actions expected |
|---|---|
| History & general assessment | Duration, glycaemic control, claudication/rest pain, prior ulcer/amputation, smoking, footwear; BP, BMI, complication screening |
| Foot examination | Inspects for deformity, callus, ulcer, infection; palpates dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial pulses; tests sensation with 10-g monofilament and 128-Hz tuning fork; checks ankle reflexes |
| Problem classification | Identifies likely mixed neuropathic-ischaemic foot with infection; recognises this as a diabetic foot emergency needing urgent multidisciplinary referral |
| Investigations | Wound swab/bone sampling, blood glucose and HbA1c, FBC, CRP, renal function, X-ray/MRI for osteomyelitis, Doppler/ABPI, urgent vascular review |
| Glycaemic ladder | Confirms metformin dose/limits (eGFR 60 — continue but monitor); adds an SGLT2 inhibitor or GLP-1 receptor agonist; escalates to insulin (start basal 10 units/day or 0.1 to 0.2 units/kg/day, then add prandial boluses and titrate) given HbA1c 9.1 percent and infection[1] |
| Infection & ischaemia | Broad-spectrum antibiotics for infection (e.g. amoxicillin-clavulanate; broaden for severe/deep); offloading (total contact cast); urgent revascularisation if ischaemic |
| BP / lipids / disposition | ACE inhibitor for BP/albuminuria to below 130/80; high-intensity statin; urgent foot-team/vascular referral; admit if deep infection, sepsis or critical ischaemia |
Model key actions
- Foot exam reproduced: reduced pulses and loss of monofilament sensation indicate a mixed neuropathic-ischaemic ulcer; warmth, surrounding cellulitis or pus = infection (a diabetic foot emergency).[3]
- Glycaemic control: confirm metformin dose and do not exceed limits in CKD (adjust the dose below eGFR 45, stop below 30 mL/min/1.73 m²);[9] given HbA1c 9.1 percent with infection, escalate to insulin (start basal 10 units/day or 0.1 to 0.2 units/kg/day, then add prandial boluses and titrate to glucose).[1]
- Multidisciplinary care: urgent referral to the diabetic foot team; offloading, debridement, swab-guided antibiotics, and vascular assessment (Doppler/ABPI, revascularisation if ischaemic).[3]
- Risk-factor control: ACE inhibitor for BP below 130/80 and any albuminuria; high-intensity statin; smoking cessation; structured education.
Common errors
- Treating the ulcer as trivial and not recognising the diabetic foot emergency (risk of amputation/sepsis).
- Not palpating pulses or testing 10-g monofilament sensation — missing ischaemia or loss of protective sensation.
- Continuing metformin without regard to the eGFR (CKD) dose limits, or failing to escalate to insulin in the face of HbA1c 9.1 percent and infection.
- Giving glucose-only advice and ignoring blood-pressure and lipid control and multidisciplinary referral.
- Not addressing offloading, debridement and vascular review — the measures that actually heal the foot.[3]
References4ShowHide
- [1]Tegegne BA, et al. A critical review on diabetes mellitus type 1 and type 2 management approaches. Front Endocrinol, 2024.PMID 39493778
- [3]American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee Summary of Revisions: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care, 2024.PMID 38078579
- [8]UKPDS Group Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin ... (UKPDS 34). Lancet, 1998.PMID 9742977
- [9]de Boer IH, Khunti K, Sadusky T, et al. Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Diabetes Care, 2022.PMID 36189689