Psych Vivas · Child and adolescent psychiatry — neurodevelopmental
Language and communication disorders — structured clinical viva
Fellowship viva covering DLD/SPCD differential, SLT-first care, literacy and behaviour comorbidity, bilingual counselling, and no-drug-for-core-language teaching.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
Interpretation
Reveal interpretationShowHide
This is impairing DLD with secondary behavioural crisis, literacy failure, bullying, possible ADHD, and parental demand for medication to 'fix talking' — not a primary antipsychotic or stimulant-first scenario. Validate distress, reframe aggression as often communication-driven, and hold a dual plan: intensive SLT/education supports plus careful psychiatric comorbidity work.[2][5]
Formulation. Neurodevelopmental language disorder (CATALISE DLD) with mixed receptive-expressive impairment, literacy cascade, social stress from peer victimisation, and possible ADHD. Pragmatic concerns on CCC-2 with negative ADOS → consider pragmatic weaknesses secondary to language/social stress rather than automatic SPCD; SPCD would require persistent social-use deficits not better explained by structural language disorder or ASD, and ASD is not supported here.[1][4][8]
Core treatment. Name speech-language therapy as definitive for language; Law meta-analysis supports efficacy especially for phonological/expressive targets. School accommodations and literacy intervention linked to oral language (Snowling). Anti-bullying and restorative school plan to reduce exclusion cycles.[3][6]
Medication counselling. No tablet fixes core DLD. If ADHD criteria are clear after language-accessible assessment, discuss stimulant/non-stimulant pathways with monitoring — framed as treating attention comorbidity, not speech. Avoid antipsychotics for communication-driven behaviour without specialist justification.[3][5]
Bilingualism. Does not cause DLD; keep home language; assess both languages.[1][2]
Prognosis/risk. Language impairment elevates later internalising/externalising risk (Yew); early support and comorbidity care improve function. Prevalence context: clinically important language disorder is common (~7–8% order at school entry).[5][7]
References8ShowHide
- [1]Bishop DVM, Snowling MJ, Thompson PA, Greenhalgh T; CATALISE consortium CATALISE: A Multinational and Multidisciplinary Delphi Consensus Study. Identifying Language Impairments in Children PLoS One, 2016.PMID 27392128
- [2]Bishop DVM, Snowling MJ, Thompson PA, Greenhalgh T; CATALISE-2 consortium Phase 2 of CATALISE: a multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study of problems with language development: Terminology J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 2017.PMID 28369935
- [3]Law J, Garrett Z, Nye C The efficacy of treatment for children with developmental speech and language delay/disorder: a meta-analysis J Speech Lang Hear Res, 2004.PMID 15324296
- [4]Norbury CF Practitioner review: Social (pragmatic) communication disorder conceptualization, evidence and clinical implications J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 2014.PMID 24117874
- [5]Yew SG, O'Kearney R Emotional and behavioural outcomes later in childhood and adolescence for children with specific language impairments: meta-analyses of controlled prospective studies J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 2013.PMID 23082773
- [6]Snowling MJ, Hulme C Interventions for children's language and literacy difficulties Int J Lang Commun Disord, 2012.PMID 22268899
- [7]Norbury CF, Gooch D, Wray C, et al. The impact of nonverbal ability on prevalence and clinical presentation of language disorder: evidence from a population study J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 2016.PMID 27184709
- [8]Swineford LB, Thurm A, Baird G, Wetherby AM, Swedo S Social (pragmatic) communication disorder: a research review of this new DSM-5 diagnostic category J Neurodev Disord, 2014.PMID 25484991