Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Psych TopicsFoundations

Psych · Foundations

Human development across the lifespan

Also known as Lifespan development · Developmental psychology for psychiatry · Piaget Erikson Kohlberg · Cognitive ageing · Gene-environment development · Sensitive periods psychiatry

Exam-exhaustive fellowship reference on human development across the lifespan for psychiatry — Piaget, Erikson, Kohlberg/Gilligan, adult development and successful ageing, ageing cognition, gene–environment interplay, adversity timing and plasticity, resilience, and clinical/exam applications for FRANZCP, MRCPsych, ABPN, and MD/DNB.

high20 referencesUpdated 26 July 202614 min readVerification in progress

Practise this topic

  • 10 MCQs

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic10 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNBNEET-SS

Red flags

  • Reifying stage ages as rigid destiny rather than approximate, culturally moderated maps
  • Treating ACE scores as individual fate or as a diagnosis
  • Citing classic single-gene G×E (e.g. 5-HTTLPR × stress) without meta-analytic caution
  • Missing organic causes of developmental regression or new cognitive decline
  • Adultomorphising children or infantilising older adults in assessment and consent processes
  • Pathologising normative identity exploration or cultural developmental variation
On this page
Study tools

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic10 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNBNEET-SS

Red flags

  • Reifying stage ages as rigid destiny rather than approximate, culturally moderated maps
  • Treating ACE scores as individual fate or as a diagnosis
  • Citing classic single-gene G×E (e.g. 5-HTTLPR × stress) without meta-analytic caution
  • Missing organic causes of developmental regression or new cognitive decline
  • Adultomorphising children or infantilising older adults in assessment and consent processes
  • Pathologising normative identity exploration or cultural developmental variation
The one-line answer

Development is a clinical operating system, not a list of ages. Carry five frameworks — Piaget for cognition, Erikson for psychosocial crises, Kohlberg for moral reasoning, Marcia for identity, and the dual-systems model for adolescent risk — then update them with cortical maturation, sensitive-period timing, and adversity biology. Stage ages are approximate maps, never destiny. Match your assessment and your treatment to the developmental level, hunt the organic cause of any regression, and let plasticity and resilience keep the formulation hopeful.[1][5][9][18][19]

Meet the patient — and the question her mother is really asking

A 16-year-old is brought in after cutting her arm. She is bright, socially anxious, and absorbed in whether she is "a real person". She started smoking cannabis three months ago, hangs out with older peers, and her sleep has inverted. Her mother asks the only question that matters to her: "Is this a phase, or is this who she is?"[5][6]

Every developmental stem is really two questions wearing one mask: is this expected development, and is there pathology riding on top of it? A consultant separates them by stage, by timing, and by trajectory — never by gut alone. This topic is the toolkit for doing that at fellowship depth.[4][6][7]

Etymology for viva gold: adolescence comes from the Latin adolescere, "to grow up" — the same root as adult. The word itself says these are people mid-becoming, which is exactly why a single cross-sectional snapshot misleads you.[5]

Psychiatry Fellowship Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this topic. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Psychiatry Fellowship fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References20ShowHide
  1. [1]Diamond A Executive functions Annu Rev Psychol, 2013.PMID 23020641
  2. [2]Gogtay N, Giedd JN, Lusk L, et al. Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2004.PMID 15148381
  3. [3]Giedd JN Structural magnetic resonance imaging of the adolescent brain Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2004.PMID 15251877
  4. [4]Blakemore SJ The social brain in adolescence Nat Rev Neurosci, 2008.PMID 18354399
  5. [5]Steinberg L A dual systems model of adolescent risk-taking Dev Psychobiol, 2010.PMID 20213754
  6. [6]Marcia JE Development and validation of ego-identity status J Pers Soc Psychol, 1966.PMID 5939604
  7. [7]Kroger J, Martinussen M, Marcia JE Identity status change during adolescence and young adulthood: a meta-analysis J Adolesc, 2010.PMID 20004962
  8. [8]Muuss RE Carol Gilligan's theory of sex differences in the development of moral reasoning during adolescence Adolescence, 1988.PMID 3381683
  9. [9]Felitti VJ, Anda RF, Nordenberg D, et al. Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults. The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study Am J Prev Med, 1998.PMID 9635069
  10. [10]Chapman DP, Whitfield CL, Felitti VJ, et al. Adverse childhood experiences and the risk of depressive disorders in adulthood J Affect Disord, 2004.PMID 15488250
  11. [11]Weaver IC, Cervoni N, Champagne FA, et al. Epigenetic programming by maternal behavior Nat Neurosci, 2004.PMID 15220929
  12. [12]Caspi A, Sugden K, Moffitt TE, et al. Influence of life stress on depression: moderation by a polymorphism in the 5-HTT gene Science, 2003.PMID 12869766
  13. [13]Culverhouse RC, Saccone NL, Horton AC, et al. Collaborative meta-analysis finds no evidence of a strong interaction between stress and 5-HTTLPR genotype contributing to the development of depression Mol Psychiatry, 2018.PMID 28373689
  14. [14]Knudsen EI Sensitive periods in the development of the brain and behavior J Cogn Neurosci, 2004.PMID 15509387
  15. [15]Nelson CA 3rd, Gabard-Durnam LJ Early Adversity and Critical Periods: Neurodevelopmental Consequences of Violating the Expectable Environment Trends Neurosci, 2020.PMID 32101708
  16. [16]Nelson CA 3rd, Zeanah CH, Fox NA, et al. Cognitive recovery in socially deprived young children: the Bucharest Early Intervention Project Science, 2007.PMID 18096809
  17. [17]Teicher MH, Samson JA Annual Research Review: Enduring neurobiological effects of childhood abuse and neglect J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 2016.PMID 26831814
  18. [18]Rutter M Resilience as a dynamic concept Dev Psychopathol, 2012.PMID 22559117
  19. [19]Salthouse TA The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition Psychol Rev, 1996.PMID 8759042
  20. [20]Schaie KW The course of adult intellectual development Am Psychol, 1994.PMID 8203802

Test yourself

Practise what you just read

  • 10 MCQs
Psychiatry Fellowship Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Psychiatry Fellowship library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousDescriptive psychopathology and phenomenologyfoundationsNextNeuroanatomy and neural circuits for psychiatristsfoundations