Psych MEQs / SAQs · General adult psychiatry — mood disorders
Major depressive disorder — assessment and stepped management (MEQ)
FRANZCP-style modified essay on moderate-severe recurrent MDD: risk and medical exclusion, differential including bipolar and alcohol, first-line pharmacotherapy with monitoring, psychotherapy, STAR*D sequential logic, and ECT thresholds. FRANZCP-primary, globally tagged.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
Model answer
Reveal model answerShowHide
(i) Assessment priorities. Structure as risk, bipolarity, substances, medical exclusion, MSE, collateral, capacity and social context. Risk: expand item 9 into full assessment — ideation frequency, intent, plan, means (medications, access at home), prior attempts, hopelessness, protective factors (children, work identity, religion), alcohol-related impulsivity. Bipolar screen: elevated/irritable periods, reduced sleep need, grandiosity, risky spending/sex, postpartum mood events, family history of bipolar. Alcohol: quantity, withdrawal risk, contribution to insomnia and mood. Medical: thyroid, anaemia, B12 if indicated, medications, pregnancy status if relevant. Baseline bloods and ECG before antidepressant if indicated by age/cardiac risk/agent choice. Collateral from partner if available. Capacity for treatment decisions; voluntary care preferred if safe.[4][5]
(ii) Working diagnosis and differentials. Working diagnosis: recurrent major depressive disorder, current episode moderate-severe (melancholic-leaning neurovegetative features), with alcohol use disorder comorbidity contributing. Differentials: bipolar depression (must remain active until screen complete); substance-induced depressive disorder (alcohol may fully or partly explain — dual formulation); persistent depressive disorder with superimposed episode; adjustment disorder (too severe/neurovegetative here); medical (hypothyroid etc.); grief (not described). Discriminators: longitudinal mania/hypomania, timeline with alcohol, TSH/labs, psychosis absence/presence.[4]
(iii) Initial management. Collaborative safety plan and means restriction (secure surplus medications; reduce alcohol). Psychoeducation. Offer evidence-based psychotherapy (CBT or IPT) and lifestyle structure (sleep, activity scheduling). Named first-line drug example: sertraline 50 mg orally each morning, review in 1–2 weeks for activation/suicidality and side-effects, titrate toward 100 mg if tolerated and incomplete response, plan 4–6 weeks at therapeutic dose with serial PHQ-9. Monitoring: sexual side-effects, GI symptoms, hyponatraemia risk if older/comorbid, interactions. Address alcohol with motivational work and withdrawal risk assessment. Crisis contacts and early review. Do not stop at a 3-month course if remits — plan maintenance counselling later.[2][4]
(iv) STAR*D sequential logic. Measurement-based care improves systematic dose adjustment. Roughly one-third remit at first-step SSRI; non-remitters move to switch (alternative antidepressant) or augment depending on partial vs non-response and tolerability; further steps include lithium or T3 augmentation and more complex combinations, with diminishing cumulative remission — so avoid random polypharmacy and re-check diagnosis/adherence/substances at each step.[1][2]
(v) ECT threshold. Escalate to ECT if she develops psychotic features, catatonia, life-threatening poor intake, rapidly escalating suicide risk not containable in current setting, or true treatment resistance after adequate trials — ECT is highly effective in severe depressive disorders and is not only a last resort after endless incomplete trials.[3]
References5ShowHide
- [1]Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Wisniewski SR, et al. Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: a STAR*D report Am J Psychiatry, 2006.PMID 17074942
- [2]Trivedi MH, Rush AJ, Wisniewski SR, et al. Evaluation of outcomes with citalopram for depression using measurement-based care in STAR*D: implications for clinical practice Am J Psychiatry, 2006.PMID 16390886
- [3]UK ECT Review Group Efficacy and safety of electroconvulsive therapy in depressive disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lancet, 2003.PMID 12642045
- [4]Malhi GS, Bell E, Bassett D, et al. The 2020 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines for mood disorders Aust N Z J Psychiatry, 2021.PMID 33353391
- [5]Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure J Gen Intern Med, 2001.PMID 11556941