Psych MEQs / SAQs · Foundations — basic neuroscience for psychiatry
Basic neuroscience for psychiatry — MEQ
FRANZCP-style MEQ on multilevel neuroscience, LTP, dopamine pathways, methods critique, and syndrome translation.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
Model answer
Reveal model answerShowHide
(i) Levels and RDoC. Useful levels: molecule/receptor → synapse/plasticity → pathway → large-scale network → behaviour/syndrome. Clinical care still uses DSM/ICD categorical diagnoses for communication and eligibility. RDoC organises dimensional research constructs (e.g. negative valence, cognitive systems) across units of analysis; it does not replace clinical manuals. [4]
(ii) LTP. High-frequency or associative co-activation can strengthen synapses. At many glutamatergic synapses, NMDA receptors require glutamate and postsynaptic depolarisation to relieve Mg2+ block; Ca2+ influx engages kinases and can increase AMPA-mediated transmission. Clinical implication: learning and extinction (e.g. exposure therapy) are plasticity processes; delayed antidepressant effects have been linked to slower adaptive plasticity/neurotrophic changes rather than instantaneous 'filling a serotonin tank.' [1][6]
(iii) Dopamine map and version III. Mesolimbic — positive symptoms/salience; mesocortical — cognition/negatives; nigrostriatal — EPS with blockade; tuberoinfundibular — prolactin with blockade. Version III: multiple upstream risks converge on striatal dopamine dysregulation as a final common pathway producing aberrant salience. [2]
(iv) Methods. Structural MRI when organic red flags (atypical onset, focal signs, decline) — not to 'confirm MDD.' fMRI BOLD is a haemodynamic proxy; research-powerful; reverse inference dangerous; not routine diagnosis. [3] EEG for seizures/encephalopathy differentials. PET/SPECT occupancy underpins receptor pharmacology teaching (e.g. D2) but is not required before every prescription.
(v) Translation. Psychosis: striatal DA/aberrant salience and network dysconnectivity (triple-network framing). Depression: limbic–prefrontal and reward circuit dysfunction plus stress–neurotrophic models — not pure monoamine deficiency. Anchors: Howes–Kapur; Nestler; Menon; Logothetis for method humility. [2][5][6]
References6ShowHide
- [1]Malenka RC, Bear MF LTP and LTD: an embarrassment of riches Neuron, 2004.PMID 15450156
- [2]Howes OD, Kapur S The dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia: version III--the final common pathway Schizophr Bull, 2009.PMID 19325164
- [3]Logothetis NK, Pauls J, Augath M, et al. Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal Nature, 2001.PMID 11449264
- [4]Insel T, Cuthbert B, Garvey M, et al. Research domain criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders Am J Psychiatry, 2010.PMID 20595427
- [5]Menon V Large-scale brain networks and psychopathology: a unifying triple network model Trends Cogn Sci, 2011.PMID 21908230
- [6]Nestler EJ, Barrot M, DiLeone RJ, et al. Neurobiology of depression Neuron, 2002.PMID 11931738