Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Psych MEQs / SAQsChild and adolescent psychiatry — attachment disorders

Psych MEQs / SAQs · Child and adolescent psychiatry — attachment disorders

Attachment disorders in children — RAD/DSED assessment and caregiving-first care (MEQ)

FRANZCP-style MEQ on childhood attachment disorders: RAD vs DSED, assessment, caregiving-first treatment, reject coercive therapies, prognosis after institutional care.

20 marks20 min1 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB
Prompt
A 3-year-old girl is referred from an adoption clinic. She spent her first 18 months in an understaffed institution overseas, then had three short foster placements before a stable adoptive home for 9 months. Adoptive parents report she still greets strangers by climbing onto their laps and has twice tried to leave a supermarket with an unfamiliar adult. At home she is warmer than initially but still shows limited comfort-seeking when hurt. School nursery staff say she is 'indiscriminately affectionate.' Parents ask whether she has autism, whether they caused the problem, and whether holding therapy recommended online will help. (i) Discriminate RAD, DSED and insecure attachment style; state the insufficient-care criterion. (ii) Outline multi-source assessment including ASD/ADHD differentials and risk. (iii) Give a first-line management plan aligned with AACAP, including named carer-focused intervention concepts. (iv) Address coercive attachment therapies using APSAC principles. (v) Counsel prognosis including relative persistence of disinhibited features. (20 marks)

Model answer

Reveal model answerShowHide

(i) Classification. This history of institutional care and serial placements constitutes extremes of insufficient care. The dominant phenotype is DSED (overly familiar stranger approach, willingness to leave with unfamiliar adults, little checking back). Residual limited comfort-seeking may reflect improving or partial RAD features; the two are separate DSM-5-TR disorders that can be considered carefully rather than forced into one outdated subtype label. Insecure attachment style is dimensional variation and not a clinical diagnosis of RAD/DSED without criteria.[1][2]

(ii) Assessment. Multi-source history (adoptive parents, nursery, prior records). Map full RAD and DSED criteria, developmental age, course since placement. Observe child with carer and with stranger when safe. Screen ASD (RRBs, sensory, pervasive social-communication), ADHD, cognition/language, hearing, growth/nutrition, PTSD. Risk: absconding with strangers, exploitation, placement stress. Do not assume current adoptive parents caused early-deprivation sequelae.[1][4]

(iii) Management. First-line: maintain stable sensitive primary caregiving, minimise further moves, carer psychoeducation and coaching (nurture, follow child's lead, consistent boundaries for strangers). Name ABC / sensitivity-based parent coaching as evidence-informed models. Supervise outings. Treat comorbidity if present. No medication for attachment itself.[1][5][6]

(iv) Coercive therapies. Explicitly refuse holding, rebirthing and forced-regression "attachment therapies" as unproven and potentially dangerous per APSAC task force; redirect to conventional non-coercive care.[3]

(v) Prognosis. Inhibited features often improve with good care; disinhibited behaviours can persist after placement improvement (ERA-informed teaching). BEIP supports that high-quality caregiving environments improve recovery trajectories after early deprivation, with earlier enrichment generally better — communicate hope without promising instant full resolution.[4][6][7]

Psychiatry Fellowship Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this meqs / saq. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Psychiatry Fellowship fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References7ShowHide
  1. [1]Zeanah CH, Chesher T, Boris NW Practice Parameter for the Assessment and Treatment of Children and Adolescents With Reactive Attachment Disorder and Disinhibited Social Engagement Disorder J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 2016.PMID 27806867
  2. [2]Gleason MM, Fox NA, Drury S, et al. Validity of evidence-derived criteria for reactive attachment disorder: indiscriminately social/disinhibited and emotionally withdrawn/inhibited types J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 2011.PMID 21334562
  3. [3]Chaffin M, Hanson R, Saunders BE, et al. Report of the APSAC task force on attachment therapy, reactive attachment disorder, and attachment problems Child Maltreat, 2006.PMID 16382093
  4. [4]O'Connor TG, Rutter M Attachment disorder behavior following early severe deprivation: extension and longitudinal follow-up J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 2000.PMID 10846304
  5. [5]Yarger HA, Lind T, Raby KL, et al. Intervening With Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up to Reduce Behavior Problems Among Children Adopted Internationally: Evidence From a Randomized Controlled Trial Child Maltreat, 2022.PMID 33882710
  6. [6]Fox NA, Nelson CA 3rd, Zeanah CH The Effects of Psychosocial Deprivation on Attachment: Lessons from the Bucharest Early Intervention Project Psychodyn Psychiatry, 2017.PMID 29244624
  7. [7]Nelson CA 3rd, Zeanah CH, Fox NA, et al. Cognitive recovery in socially deprived young children: the Bucharest Early Intervention Project Science, 2007.PMID 18096809
Psychiatry Fellowship Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Psychiatry Fellowship library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousPica and rumination — medical risk, discrimination, and first-line treatment (MEQ)General adult psychiatry — feeding and eating disordersNextAutism and ID dual diagnosis — assessment to behaviour and epilepsy (MEQ)Intellectual disability psychiatry — neurodevelopmental dual diagnosis