Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Psych CASC / OSCEForensic psychiatry — stalking and harassment

Psych CASC / OSCE · Forensic psychiatry — stalking and harassment

Explain stalking risk and safety planning to a victim's support person — CASC communication station

MRCPsych/FRANZCP-style CASC: explain multi-domain stalking risk, parallel safety and treatment tracks, and residual uncertainty without graphic detail or victim-blaming.

communication2 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB
Prompt
An adult sibling of a woman subjected to ex-intimate stalking wants a clear, non-sensational explanation of what stalking is, what risks the team considers (not only assault), why 'meeting to talk it out' is unsafe, what treatment of the stalker can and cannot achieve, and how multi-agency safety works in principle.

Station brief

Format. Communication station, approximately 7–10 minutes active time after reading. You are the psychiatry registrar supporting the community/forensic interface. The examiner plays the sibling of a woman subjected to post-separation stalking. [2]

Candidate instructions. Explain in plain non-sensational language: what stalking means; that harm includes fear and life disruption not only assault; why ex-intimate context matters for violence concern; why a private "clear the air" meeting is usually unsafe; that treatment of the person who stalks and legal safety steps run in parallel; residual uncertainty. No graphic detail. No victim-blaming. Check understanding.[1][3][5]

Psychiatry Fellowship Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this CASC / OSCE. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Psychiatry Fellowship fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References5ShowHide
  1. [1]Pathé M, Mullen PE The impact of stalkers on their victims Br J Psychiatry, 1997.PMID 9068768
  2. [2]Mullen PE, Mackenzie R, Ogloff JR, et al. Assessing and managing the risks in the stalking situation J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, 2006.PMID 17185471
  3. [3]McEwan TE, Mullen PE, MacKenzie RD, et al. Violence in stalking situations Psychol Med, 2009.PMID 19215627
  4. [4]Mullen PE, Pathé M, Purcell R, et al. Study of stalkers Am J Psychiatry, 1999.PMID 10450267
  5. [5]Large MM, Ryan CJ, Nielssen OB Helpful and unhelpful risk assessment practices Psychiatr Serv, 2010.PMID 20439381
Psychiatry Fellowship Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Psychiatry Fellowship library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousExplain specific learning disorder and school plan — CASC communication stationChild and adolescent psychiatry — specific learning disorderNextExplain stimulant crash and why there is no methadone for ice — CASC communication stationAddiction psychiatry — acute stimulant syndromes