Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Psych CASC / OSCEForensic psychiatry — risk assessment

Psych CASC / OSCE · Forensic psychiatry — risk assessment

Explain forensic risk assessment and leave plan to a family member — CASC communication station

MRCPsych/FRANZCP-style CASC: explain SPJ vs actuarial concepts, static/dynamic/protective factors, leave conditions, multi-agency principles, and residual uncertainty to a family member.

communication2 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB
Prompt
A sibling of a medium-secure patient seeks clear explanation of how risk is assessed before leave, without stigmatising language, and wants to know if an actuarial 'high' score means leave is impossible.

Station brief

Format. Communication station, approximately 7–10 minutes active time after reading. You are the forensic psychiatry registrar. The examiner plays the adult sibling of a patient in medium security. [1]

Candidate instructions. Explain how the team assesses risk before leave using plain language. Cover structured assessment (not just a score), history vs current changeable factors, strengths/protective factors, conditions of leave, what would stop leave, and residual uncertainty. Avoid equating mental illness with permanent dangerousness. Do not invent specific Mental Health Act section numbers. Check understanding and invite questions. [1][3][4]

Psychiatry Fellowship Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this CASC / OSCE. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Psychiatry Fellowship fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References5ShowHide
  1. [1]Buchanan A Risk of violence by psychiatric patients: beyond the "actuarial versus clinical" assessment debate Psychiatr Serv, 2008.PMID 18245161
  2. [2]De Vries Robbé M, de Vogel V, Douglas KS, et al. Changes in dynamic risk and protective factors for violence during inpatient forensic psychiatric treatment: predicting reductions in postdischarge community recidivism Law Hum Behav, 2015.PMID 24933171
  3. [3]Large MM, Ryan CJ, Nielssen OB Helpful and unhelpful risk assessment practices Psychiatr Serv, 2010.PMID 20439381
  4. [4]Storey JE, Watt KA, Hart SD An examination of violence risk communication in practice using a structured professional judgment framework Behav Sci Law, 2015.PMID 25615811
  5. [5]Fazel S, Gulati G, Linsell L, et al. Schizophrenia and violence: systematic review and meta-analysis PLoS Med, 2009.PMID 19668362
Psychiatry Fellowship Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Psychiatry Fellowship library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousExplain fitness concerns to counsel — CASC communication stationForensic psychiatry — fitness and criminal responsibilityNextExplain frontotemporal dementia diagnosis and plan to patient and partner — CASC communication stationOld age psychiatry — neurocognitive disorders