Phys Vivas · renal
Renal Replacement Therapy (Haemodialysis, Peritoneal Dialysis) — Viva Defence
Structured DCE viva: long-case defence of a 67-year-old woman with cardiac disease and frailty approaching end-stage kidney disease — modality reasoning, access timing, the cardiovascular burden and the goals-of-care defence, with probing first-person answers.
On this page & tools
Target exams
Opening statement (SASPOP, delivered aloud)
"Mrs Nguyen is a 67-year-old woman with CKD5 from hypertension and diabetes, an eGFR of 8 on a clear downward trajectory, and two facts that dominate every decision: ischaemic heart disease with a borderline ejection fraction — because cardiovascular disease is what kills dialysis patients and haemodialysis is itself a cardiac stress — and emerging frailty, which reshapes what any therapy can achieve. She is currently asymptomatic from her kidneys, so per the IDEAL evidence she does not need to start dialysis today; but her planning window is closing, and it has not yet been used. Her main problems are: advanced CKD needing a modality decision within months, not weeks; cardiovascular disease that both disqualifies her from transplant listing until assessed and makes intradialytic hypotension genuinely dangerous; frailty and dependence that must shape the modality and the goals conversation; and an unstarted access plan. My plan is to complete cardiac and frailty assessment, run the modality conversation honestly — assisted peritoneal dialysis at home versus supervised in-centre haemodialysis versus a structured conservative pathway — create access in time for the anticipated start, and integrate her stated priorities: time at home with her husband is the outcome she is actually buying." [1] [10] [7]
You have read the opening of this viva. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Physician Medicine fellowship atlas.
References10Show ledgerHide ledger
- [1]Cooper BA, Branley P, Bulfone L, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of early versus late initiation of dialysis N Engl J Med, 2010.PMID 20581422
- [2]Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD Work Group KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease Kidney Int, 2024.PMID 38490803
- [3]Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL, et al. Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant N Engl J Med, 1999.PMID 10580071
- [4]Mehrotra R, Chiu YW, Kalantar-Zadeh K, et al. Similar outcomes with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease Arch Intern Med, 2011.PMID 20876398
- [5]Himmelfarb J, Ikizler TA. Hemodialysis N Engl J Med, 2010.PMID 21047227
- [6]Teitelbaum I Peritoneal Dialysis N Engl J Med, 2021.PMID 34731538
- [7]Lok CE, Huber TS, Lee T, et al. KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Vascular Access: 2019 Update Am J Kidney Dis, 2020.PMID 32778223
- [8]National Kidney Foundation KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Hemodialysis Adequacy: 2015 update Am J Kidney Dis, 2015.PMID 26498416
- [9]Eknoyan G, Beck GJ, Cheung AK, et al. Effect of dialysis dose and membrane flux in maintenance hemodialysis N Engl J Med, 2002.PMID 12490682
- [10]Chertow GM, Levin NW, Beck GJ, et al. In-center hemodialysis six times per week versus three times per week N Engl J Med, 2010.PMID 21091062