Phys · respiratory
Pulmonary Embolism
Also known as pulmonary embolism · PE · venous thromboembolism · VTE · pulmonary thromboembolism · massive PE · submassive PE · intermediate-risk PE · chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension · CTEPH
Consultant-physician-depth guide to pulmonary embolism — Virchow triad and risk factors, clinical probability (Wells, PERC, Revised Geneva), CTPA- and V/Q-based diagnosis, ESC risk stratification (PESI/sPESI, biomarkers, echo), anticoagulation with DOACs/LMWH, thrombolysis and embolectomy for massive PE, CTEPH, and special situations — structured for FRACP DWE and DCE preparation.
On this page
Study tools
Your progress
Saved on this device.
Practise this topic
Target exams
Red flags
- Massive (high-risk) PE — sustained hypotension, shock, or cardiac arrest from acute RV failure
- Intermediate-high-risk PE — RV dysfunction on imaging plus positive troponin or BNP, at risk of decompensation
- Paradoxical embolism through a patent foramen ovale causing stroke
- Haemodynamic collapse on induction of anaesthesia in a patient with undiagnosed PE
- Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia presenting as worsening thrombosis on heparin
- CTEPH with progressive pulmonary hypertension and right heart failure
Pulmonary Embolism
The answer first
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the acute obstruction of the pulmonary arterial tree by material embolising from a systemic vein, almost always a deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower limb or pelvis. Together, DVT and PE are venous thromboembolism (VTE) — one disease with two clinical faces. PE is common, lethal, and frequently missed: it kills more inpatients in the developed world than any other preventable cause. [1]
Three decisions determine every PE case, and they must land before the details: [1]
- How likely is PE right now? Use a structured pre-test probability tool — the Wells score (PE likely greater than 4, PE unlikely 4 or less) or the Revised Geneva score (fully objective). In a clearly low-risk patient, the PERC rule can safely forego testing entirely.
- Is this patient haemodynamically stable? Shock or sustained hypotension makes this a high-risk (massive) PE — the only category where reperfusion therapy (thrombolysis, embolectomy) is mandatory and immediately life-saving. Everyone else is first anticoagulated.
- What is the early-death risk? Use sPESI, biomarkers (troponin, BNP), and echo to split the stable group into low (suitable for outpatient or short-stay), intermediate-low, and intermediate-high (admit, monitor for decompensation, consider rescue thrombolysis). [1]
Two facts govern the long view: [1]
- Therapeutic anticoagulation should not wait for imaging when clinical probability is high and there is no contraindication — the risk of the disease exceeds the bleeding risk of a single day of low-molecular-weight heparin.
- Duration of anticoagulation is dictated by provokability, not by the clot itself. Provoked by surgery or a transient risk factor: 3 months. Unprovoked: 3 to 6 months then reassess, often indefinite. Cancer-associated or inherited thrombophilia with recurrent events: indefinite. [1]
References14ShowHide
- [1]Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, et al. Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and d-dimer Ann Intern Med, 2001.PMID 11453709
- [2]Le Gal G, Righini M, Roy PM, et al. Prediction of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: the revised Geneva score Ann Intern Med, 2006.PMID 16461960
- [3]Kline JA, Courtney DM, Kabrhel C, et al. Prospective multicenter evaluation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria J Thromb Haemost, 2008.PMID 18318689
- [4]Righini M, Van Es J, Den Exter PL, et al. Age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to rule out pulmonary embolism: the ADJUST-PE study JAMA, 2014.PMID 24643601
- [5]Aujesky D, Obrosky DS, Stone RA, et al. Derivation and validation of a prognostic model for pulmonary embolism Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2005.PMID 16020800
- [6]Jiménez D, Aujesky D, Moores L, et al. Simplification of the pulmonary embolism severity index for prognostication in patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism Arch Intern Med, 2010.PMID 20696966
- [7]Goldhaber SZ, Visani L, De Rosa M Acute pulmonary embolism: clinical outcomes in the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry (ICOPER) Lancet, 1999.PMID 10227218
- [8]Konstantinides S, Geibel A, Heusel G, et al. Heparin plus alteplase compared with heparin alone in patients with submassive pulmonary embolism N Engl J Med, 2002.PMID 12374874
- [9]Meyer G, Vicaut E, Danays T, et al. Fibrinolysis for patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism N Engl J Med, 2014.PMID 24716681
- [10]Büller HR, Prins MH, Lensin AW, et al. Oral rivaroxaban for the treatment of symptomatic pulmonary embolism N Engl J Med, 2012.PMID 22449293
- [11]Agnelli G, Buller HR, Cohen A, et al. Oral apixaban for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism N Engl J Med, 2013.PMID 23808982
- [12]Schulman S, Kearon C, Kakkar AK, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism N Engl J Med, 2009.PMID 19966341
- [13]Büller HR, Décousus H, Grosso MA, et al. Edoxaban versus warfarin for the treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism N Engl J Med, 2013.PMID 23991658
- [14]Pengo V, Lensing AW, Prandoni P, et al. Incidence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary embolism N Engl J Med, 2004.PMID 15163775