Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Phys Topicsrespiratory

Phys · respiratory

Pulmonary Embolism

Also known as pulmonary embolism · PE · venous thromboembolism · VTE · pulmonary thromboembolism · massive PE · submassive PE · intermediate-risk PE · chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension · CTEPH

Consultant-physician-depth guide to pulmonary embolism — Virchow triad and risk factors, clinical probability (Wells, PERC, Revised Geneva), CTPA- and V/Q-based diagnosis, ESC risk stratification (PESI/sPESI, biomarkers, echo), anticoagulation with DOACs/LMWH, thrombolysis and embolectomy for massive PE, CTEPH, and special situations — structured for FRACP DWE and DCE preparation.

high14 referencesUpdated 11 July 202625 min readVerification in progress

Practise this topic

  • 8 MCQs
  • SAQ
  • Viva
  • Case

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic

  • MCQ practice1
  • Short-answer question1
  • Viva station1
  • Clinical case1

Target exams

FRACP DWEFRACP DCEMRCP Part 1MRCP Part 2MRCP PACESABIM Internal Medicine

Red flags

  • Massive (high-risk) PE — sustained hypotension, shock, or cardiac arrest from acute RV failure
  • Intermediate-high-risk PE — RV dysfunction on imaging plus positive troponin or BNP, at risk of decompensation
  • Paradoxical embolism through a patent foramen ovale causing stroke
  • Haemodynamic collapse on induction of anaesthesia in a patient with undiagnosed PE
  • Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia presenting as worsening thrombosis on heparin
  • CTEPH with progressive pulmonary hypertension and right heart failure
On this page
Study tools

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic

  • MCQ practice1
  • Short-answer question1
  • Viva station1
  • Clinical case1

Target exams

FRACP DWEFRACP DCEMRCP Part 1MRCP Part 2MRCP PACESABIM Internal Medicine

Red flags

  • Massive (high-risk) PE — sustained hypotension, shock, or cardiac arrest from acute RV failure
  • Intermediate-high-risk PE — RV dysfunction on imaging plus positive troponin or BNP, at risk of decompensation
  • Paradoxical embolism through a patent foramen ovale causing stroke
  • Haemodynamic collapse on induction of anaesthesia in a patient with undiagnosed PE
  • Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia presenting as worsening thrombosis on heparin
  • CTEPH with progressive pulmonary hypertension and right heart failure

Pulmonary Embolism

The answer first

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the acute obstruction of the pulmonary arterial tree by material embolising from a systemic vein, almost always a deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower limb or pelvis. Together, DVT and PE are venous thromboembolism (VTE) — one disease with two clinical faces. PE is common, lethal, and frequently missed: it kills more inpatients in the developed world than any other preventable cause. [1]

Three decisions determine every PE case, and they must land before the details: [1]

  1. How likely is PE right now? Use a structured pre-test probability tool — the Wells score (PE likely greater than 4, PE unlikely 4 or less) or the Revised Geneva score (fully objective). In a clearly low-risk patient, the PERC rule can safely forego testing entirely.
  2. Is this patient haemodynamically stable? Shock or sustained hypotension makes this a high-risk (massive) PE — the only category where reperfusion therapy (thrombolysis, embolectomy) is mandatory and immediately life-saving. Everyone else is first anticoagulated.
  3. What is the early-death risk? Use sPESI, biomarkers (troponin, BNP), and echo to split the stable group into low (suitable for outpatient or short-stay), intermediate-low, and intermediate-high (admit, monitor for decompensation, consider rescue thrombolysis). [1]

Two facts govern the long view: [1]

  • Therapeutic anticoagulation should not wait for imaging when clinical probability is high and there is no contraindication — the risk of the disease exceeds the bleeding risk of a single day of low-molecular-weight heparin.
  • Duration of anticoagulation is dictated by provokability, not by the clot itself. Provoked by surgery or a transient risk factor: 3 months. Unprovoked: 3 to 6 months then reassess, often indefinite. Cancer-associated or inherited thrombophilia with recurrent events: indefinite. [1]

Physician Medicine Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this topic. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Physician Medicine fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References14ShowHide
  1. [1]Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, et al. Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and d-dimer Ann Intern Med, 2001.PMID 11453709
  2. [2]Le Gal G, Righini M, Roy PM, et al. Prediction of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: the revised Geneva score Ann Intern Med, 2006.PMID 16461960
  3. [3]Kline JA, Courtney DM, Kabrhel C, et al. Prospective multicenter evaluation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria J Thromb Haemost, 2008.PMID 18318689
  4. [4]Righini M, Van Es J, Den Exter PL, et al. Age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to rule out pulmonary embolism: the ADJUST-PE study JAMA, 2014.PMID 24643601
  5. [5]Aujesky D, Obrosky DS, Stone RA, et al. Derivation and validation of a prognostic model for pulmonary embolism Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2005.PMID 16020800
  6. [6]Jiménez D, Aujesky D, Moores L, et al. Simplification of the pulmonary embolism severity index for prognostication in patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism Arch Intern Med, 2010.PMID 20696966
  7. [7]Goldhaber SZ, Visani L, De Rosa M Acute pulmonary embolism: clinical outcomes in the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry (ICOPER) Lancet, 1999.PMID 10227218
  8. [8]Konstantinides S, Geibel A, Heusel G, et al. Heparin plus alteplase compared with heparin alone in patients with submassive pulmonary embolism N Engl J Med, 2002.PMID 12374874
  9. [9]Meyer G, Vicaut E, Danays T, et al. Fibrinolysis for patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism N Engl J Med, 2014.PMID 24716681
  10. [10]Büller HR, Prins MH, Lensin AW, et al. Oral rivaroxaban for the treatment of symptomatic pulmonary embolism N Engl J Med, 2012.PMID 22449293
  11. [11]Agnelli G, Buller HR, Cohen A, et al. Oral apixaban for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism N Engl J Med, 2013.PMID 23808982
  12. [12]Schulman S, Kearon C, Kakkar AK, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism N Engl J Med, 2009.PMID 19966341
  13. [13]Büller HR, Décousus H, Grosso MA, et al. Edoxaban versus warfarin for the treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism N Engl J Med, 2013.PMID 23991658
  14. [14]Pengo V, Lensing AW, Prandoni P, et al. Incidence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary embolism N Engl J Med, 2004.PMID 15163775

Test yourself

Practise what you just read

  • 8 MCQs
  • SAQ
  • Viva
  • Case
Physician Medicine Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Physician Medicine library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousPneumoniarespiratoryNextPulmonary Vascular Disease and Cor Pulmonalerespiratory