Phys · general-medicine
The Deteriorating Ward Patient — Recognition, Systematic Assessment and Escalation
Also known as deteriorating patient · acutely ill patient · NEWS2 · National Early Warning Score · track and trigger · early warning score · ABCDE approach · MET call · medical emergency team · rapid response team · rapid response system · ICU outreach · SBAR · failure to rescue · ceiling of care · ward cardiac arrest · clinical deterioration
Consultant-physician-depth guide to recognising and managing the acutely deteriorating ward patient. Covers the hours of warning before arrest, NEWS2 and track-and-trigger systems, the ABCDE structured assessment, the common causes of ward deterioration (sepsis, hypovolaemia, cardiac, respiratory, neurological, drug-related, metabolic), MET call criteria and escalation thresholds, SBAR structured handover, rapid response system evidence, and end-of-life decision-making including ceilings of care. Structured for FRACP DWE and DCE preparation.
On this page
Study tools
Your progress
Saved on this device.
Practise this topic
Target exams
Red flags
- In-hospital cardiac arrest is rarely sudden — approximately 80 per cent of patients show documented physiological deterioration in the hours before arrest, and the respiratory rate is the vital sign most often abnormal and most often missed
- A rising respiratory rate with falling oxygen saturation is the single earliest and most reliable marker of deterioration; a normal heart rate and blood pressure do not exclude it, because they are late-failing compensatory mechanisms
- NEWS2 of 7 or more is a clinical emergency mandating an emergency assessment by a clinician with critical care competencies within minutes, not hours — and a score of 5 or 6 requires urgent ward-based review
- Altered mental state in a deteriorating ward patient is a late sign of shock or sepsis until proven otherwise — a new confusion or reduced GCS is a MET-call criterion in its own right
- The patient whose Early Warning Score is rising on consecutive observations is deteriorating regardless of where the absolute score sits — the trend is more informative than any single value
- A systolic blood pressure that appears acceptable may be masking decompensation in a chronically hypertensive patient — a systolic of 110 in someone whose baseline is 170 is a 60 mmHg drop and represents significant shock
- Oxygen saturation is a lagging indicator — by the time SpO2 falls, the patient has already exhausted respiratory reserve; respiratory rate and effort are the leading indicators
- Never intubate a patient you cannot oxygenate and ventilate with a bag-valve-mask — call for senior airway help at the first sign that basic airway manoeuvres are failing
The Deteriorating Ward Patient — Recognition, Systematic Assessment and Escalation
Meet the patient
Mrs Margaret O'Sullivan, 78, was admitted four days ago with community-acquired pneumonia. She has ischaemic heart disease, chronic kidney disease stage 3, type 2 diabetes, and moderate aortic stenosis. The nurse calls you at 02:00 because her NEWS2 has risen from 3 to 9 over six hours. Respiratory rate 30, SpO2 88 per cent on room air, heart rate 128 in new atrial fibrillation, blood pressure 84 over 52, GCS 14 with new confusion, temperature 38.7, lactate 4.6. [1]
The question is not what drug to give — it is whether you saw her deteriorating three hours ago, when her respiratory rate first crept from 22 to 26 and the score was still a manageable 5. The trend was the signal, and a single acceptable value in a rising trend is not reassuring. [1]
References6ShowHide
- [1]Schein RM, Hazday N, Pena M, Ruben BH, Sprung CL Clinical antecedents to in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest Chest, 1990.PMID 2245680
- [2]Smith GB, Prytherch DR, Meredith P, Schmidt PE, Featherstone PI The ability of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) to discriminate patients at risk of early cardiac arrest, unanticipated intensive care unit admission, and death Resuscitation, 2013.PMID 23295778
- [3]Hillman K, Chen J, Cretikos M, et al. Introduction of the medical emergency team (MET) system: a cluster-randomised controlled trial Lancet, 2005.PMID 15964445
- [4]Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021 Intensive Care Med, 2021.PMID 34599691
- [5]Chan PS, Jain R, Nallmothu BK, Berg RA, Sasson C Rapid Response Teams: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Arch Intern Med, 2010.PMID 20065195
- [6]Maharaj R, Raffaele I, Wendon J Rapid response systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis Crit Care, 2015.PMID 26070457