Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Phys Written Answersrenal

Phys Written Answers · renal

Renal Replacement Therapy — Written Clinical Reasoning

DCE long-case preparation for RRT: modality selection, IDEAL initiation, access planning, PD peritonitis, and conservative care as an active alternative.

2 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

FRACP DCEMRCP Part 2
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

FRACP DCEMRCP Part 2
Prompt
DCE long-case preparation for RRT: modality selection, IDEAL initiation, access planning, PD peritonitis, and conservative care as an active alternative.

SAQ 1 — Dialysis planning and initiation (12 marks)

Prompt: Outline your approach to dialysis initiation timing, modality selection, and access planning for this man. Justify each decision with evidence. [1] [2]

Case vignette: A 64-year-old man with CKD stage 5 (eGFR 11, asymptomatic, no refractory hyperkalaemia, acidosis or overload) who lives 90 minutes from the dialysis unit and is interested in home therapy. [1] [2]

Model Answer

1. Timing of initiation — do not start solely on eGFR (4 marks) [1]

The IDEAL trial showed that planned early start at eGFR 10–14 confers no survival advantage over starting at eGFR 5–7 for symptoms or complications. [1] His current eGFR of 11 without uraemic symptoms, refractory hyperkalaemia, severe acidosis, or fluid overload is not an automatic start trigger. KDIGO frames initiation as symptom- and complication-driven rather than a fixed eGFR cut-off. [2]

I would monitor closely (symptoms, potassium, bicarbonate, fluid status, nutrition) and start when clinical triggers appear: uraemic symptoms, refractory hyperkalaemia or acidosis, diuretic-resistant volume overload, or uraemic pericarditis/encephalopathy. I would still prepare for dialysis now so that when triggers appear he starts electively, not as a crash-lander with a central catheter. [1] [2]

2. Modality selection — patient-fit, not superiority (4 marks) [4]

Observational data show broadly similar survival with haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis when case-mix is accounted for. [4] Selection is therefore by patient preference, residual kidney function, home support, distance from centre, body habitus, prior abdominal surgery, and lifestyle. For this man, living 90 minutes from a unit and interested in home therapy makes PD or home HD attractive if medically suitable. I would offer structured education covering centre HD, home HD, PD (CAPD/APD), and transplant work-up, with transplant first where eligible. [3] [4]

3. Access planning — fistula-first, protect veins now (4 marks) [5]

KDOQI prioritises permanent access and a fistula-first / catheter-last hierarchy where anatomy allows. [5] From today: protect the non-dominant arm from venepuncture and cannulae; refer for vascular mapping and surgical planning so an AVF has months to mature if HD is chosen. If PD is chosen, plan elective catheter placement before urgent need. Avoid temporary dialysis catheters when possible — they drive infection and central stenosis. [5]

Physician Medicine Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this written answer. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Physician Medicine fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References7ShowHide
  1. [1]Cooper BA, Branley P, Bulfone L, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of early versus late initiation of dialysis N Engl J Med, 2010.PMID 20581422
  2. [2]Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD Work Group KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease Kidney Int, 2024.PMID 38490803
  3. [3]Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL, et al. Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant N Engl J Med, 1999.PMID 10580071
  4. [4]Mehrotra R, Chiu YW, Kalantar-Zadeh K, et al. Similar outcomes with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease Arch Intern Med, 2011.PMID 20876398
  5. [5]Lok CE, Huber TS, Lee T, et al. KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Vascular Access: 2019 Update Am J Kidney Dis, 2020.PMID 32778223
  6. [6]Li PK, Chow KM, Cho Y, et al. ISPD peritonitis guideline recommendations: 2022 update on prevention and treatment Perit Dial Int, 2022.PMID 35264029
  7. [7]Chow KM, Li PK, Cho Y, et al. ISPD Catheter-related Infection Recommendations: 2023 Update Perit Dial Int, 2023.PMID 37232412
Physician Medicine Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Physician Medicine library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousRenal Cell Carcinoma AND Urothelial Malignancy — Written Clinical ReasoningrenalNextRenal Tubular Acidoses AND Inherited Tubular Disorders — Written Clinical Reasoningrenal