Phys Written Answers · haematological
Lymphoma — Written Clinical Reasoning
DCE long-case preparation: structured written reasoning for lymphoma — Hodgkin staging and PET-adapted ABVD, DLBCL with R-CHOP and the CNS-IPI, follicular watch-and-wait versus treatment, Burkitt as an oncological emergency, primary CNS lymphoma biopsy-first rule, relapsed DLBCL and CAR-T therapy.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
SAQ 1 — Newly diagnosed bulky stage IIB classical Hodgkin lymphoma in a young man (20 marks, 30 minutes)
Prompt: Outline your staging, prognostic assessment, the fertility discussion, the choice of frontline regimen, the role of PET-adapted therapy, and the structured survivorship plan. Justify each decision with reference to the evidence. [1]
Model Answer
Step 1 — Confirm stage and prognostic group (3 marks): [1]
By the Lugano classification, this patient has Ann Arbor stage IIBX (bulky) classical Hodgkin lymphoma — bulky mediastinal and bilateral cervical disease (the bulky modifier X applies because the mass is over a third of the internal thoracic diameter or 10 cm, and here the largest mass is 9 cm which is borderline; many centres would stage this as bulky IIB or even advanced based on the bulk). PET-CT has supplanted CT alone for staging Hodgkin lymphoma and can replace bone marrow biopsy when clearly negative [5][6]. His marrow is clear and there is no extranodal disease. The International Prognostic Score (IPS, Hasenclever 1998) is calculated from seven adverse factors [1]: he is male (1 point) plus albumin 38 below the 40 g/L threshold (a second point), under 45, not stage IV, with normal white cell and lymphocyte counts and no anaemia — his IPS is 2, which still predicts a favourable outcome. The bulk and B symptoms place him in an unfavourable early-stage or advanced-stage category, which guides therapy intensity.
Step 2 — Fertility preservation before chemotherapy (3 marks): [1]
Before any chemotherapy, I would urgently refer him for sperm cryopreservation — alkylating agents (particularly procarbazine in escalated BEACOPP, and dacarbazine in ABVD to a lesser extent) and anthracyclines cause gonadal toxicity and risk permanent infertility. Sperm cryopreservation is rapid (a single sample, ideally two), low-cost, and should be arranged within days so that chemotherapy is not delayed. I would document the discussion and the patient's decision. If he has a partner and they wish, embryo cryopreservation is an option. The fertility specialist and the haematologist should coordinate timing — for a young man with Hodgkin lymphoma, the standard is to bank sperm before cycle 1. [1]
Step 3 — Frontline therapy — ABVD versus A+AVD (4 marks): [1]
For bulky stage IIB Hodgkin lymphoma, the standard is 6 cycles of ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine). ABVD is given every 28 days with doxorubicin and dacarbazine and bleomycin and vinblastine on days 1 and 15. The modern alternative is brentuximab vedotin plus AVD (A+AVD) — the ECHELON-1 trial showed a modified progression-free survival advantage over ABVD in stage III to IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma, with less pulmonary toxicity (no bleomycin) but more neuropathy and neutropenia [3]. For a young man with asthma (which increases the risk of bleomycin pulmonary toxicity), A+AVD is a particularly attractive option. The shared decision with the patient weighs the pulmonary risk of ABVD (bleomycin lung is more common in patients over 40, smokers, and those with pre-existing lung disease — asthma is a relative consideration) against the neuropathy and neutropenia of A+AVD. Both achieve excellent outcomes — 5-year progression-free survival over 80 per cent.
Step 4 — PET-adapted therapy (3 marks): [1]
I would use interim PET after 2 cycles to guide subsequent therapy, scored by the Deauville 5-point scale [6]. The RATHL trial showed that patients who are PET-negative (Deauville 1 to 3) after 2 cycles of ABVD can safely de-escalate to AVD (omitting bleomycin) without loss of efficacy, while PET-positive patients (Deauville 4 to 5) are escalated to BEACOPP [4]. For this patient, if the interim PET shows a complete metabolic response (Deauville 1 to 3), I would continue ABVD or de-escalate to AVD for the remaining cycles; if PET-positive, I would escalate to escalated BEACOPP or switch to a salvage-based approach. The end-of-treatment PET determines whether consolidative involved-site radiotherapy (ISRT) is needed for bulky residual or PET-positive sites — for a bulky mediastinal mass, ISRT is often considered even after a complete metabolic response, because the relapse risk in bulky mediastinal disease with chemotherapy alone is higher.
Step 5 — Supportive care and comorbidity (3 marks): [1]
I would optimise his asthma before chemotherapy (peak flow, spirometry, review of inhaler technique, consider a course of oral corticosteroid if poorly controlled). I would prescribe antiemetics for the dacarbazine and doxorubicin (5-HT3 antagonist plus dexamethasone plus aprepitant for the highly emetogenic dacarbazine), pegfilgrastim if neutropenia develops, PJP prophylaxis (co-trimoxazole) during corticosteroid-containing cycles, and tumour lysis prophylaxis (hydration, allopurinol) given the bulk. Bleomycin pulmonary toxicity must be monitored — baseline pulmonary function tests (spirometry and DLCO), counsel the patient to report cough or exertional dyspnoea immediately, and hold bleomycin if there is significant decline in DLCO or clinical suspicion of pneumonitis. Hepatitis B serology (surface antigen, core antibody), HIV serology, and echocardiogram (baseline before doxorubicin) are part of the pretreatment workup. [1]
Step 6 — Structured survivorship plan (2 marks): [1]
After treatment, I would institute a structured late-effects surveillance plan: annual TSH (cervical radiotherapy risk of hypothyroidism), echocardiographic surveillance at 2 and 5 years (anthracycline cardiomyopathy), pulmonary function if symptomatic (bleomycin), psychological support and screening for anxiety and depression, return-to-work plan, vaccination review (re-vaccinate after anti-CD20 therapy if applicable — not relevant for ABVD), and cancer screening (smoking cessation counselling, skin cancer surveillance). For young women treated for Hodgkin (not this patient), breast MRI from 8 years post-treatment or age 40, whichever comes first, is standard. The survivorship plan is a long-case archetype and should be documented and communicated to the general practitioner. [1]
Step 7 — Communication and shared decision-making (2 marks): [1]
I would sit with the patient and his partner in a quiet room with the haematologist and a clinical nurse specialist. I would explain in plain language that Hodgkin lymphoma is highly curable (5-year survival over 85 per cent), acknowledge the shock, and set out the two frontline options (ABVD with PET-adapted de-escalation, or A+AVD) honestly — weighing pulmonary risk against neuropathy. I would address fertility (sperm banking before cycle 1), the impact on his work and young family, and the long-term plan. I would document the shared decision, provide written information and a named contact, and arrange follow-up within days. [1]
References12ShowHide
- [1]Hasenclever D, Diehl V A prognostic score for advanced Hodgkin's disease. International Prognostic Factors Project on Advanced Hodgkin's Disease N Engl J Med, 1998.PMID 9819449
- [2]Engert A, Plütschow A, Eich HT, et al. Reduced treatment intensity in patients with early-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma N Engl J Med, 2010.PMID 20818855
- [3]Connors JM, Jurczak W, Straus DJ, et al. Brentuximab Vedotin with Chemotherapy for Stage III or IV Hodgkin's Lymphoma N Engl J Med, 2018.PMID 29224502
- [4]Johnson P, Federico M, Kirkwood A, et al. Adapted Treatment Guided by Interim PET-CT Scan in Advanced Hodgkin's Lymphoma N Engl J Med, 2016.PMID 27332902
- [5]Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF, et al. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification J Clin Oncol, 2014.PMID 25113753
- [6]Barrington SF, Mikhaeel NG, Kostakoglu L, et al. Role of imaging in the staging and response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the International Conference on Malignant Lymphomas Imaging Working Group J Clin Oncol, 2014.PMID 25113771
- [7]Coiffier B, Lepage E, Briere J, et al. CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma N Engl J Med, 2002.PMID 11807147
- [8]Schmitz N, Zeynalova S, Nickelsen M, et al. CNS International Prognostic Index: A Risk Model for CNS Relapse in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated With R-CHOP J Clin Oncol, 2016.PMID 27382100
- [9]Solal-Céligny P, Roy P, Colombat P, et al. Follicular lymphoma international prognostic index Blood, 2004.PMID 15126323
- [10]Dunleavy K, Pittaluga S, Shovlin M, et al. Low-intensity therapy in adults with Burkitt's lymphoma N Engl J Med, 2013.PMID 24224624
- [11]Ferreri AJM, Cwynarski K, Pulczynski EJ, et al. Chemoimmunotherapy with methotrexate, cytarabine, thiotepa, and rituximab (MATRix regimen) in patients with primary CNS lymphoma: results of the first randomisation of the International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group-32 (IELSG32) phase 2 trial Lancet Haematol, 2016.PMID 27132696
- [12]Neelapu SS, Locke FL, Bartlett NL, et al. Axicabtagene Ciloleucel CAR T-Cell Therapy in Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma N Engl J Med, 2017.PMID 29226797