Phys Written Answers · gastrointestinal
Gastrointestinal Bleeding — Written Clinical Reasoning
DCE long-case preparation: structured written reasoning for acute upper GI bleeding management, including problem-list synthesis, risk stratification, restrictive transfusion, anticoagulation management, and integrated management planning.
3 min readVerification in progress
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
FRACP DCEMRCP Part 2
Prompt
DCE long-case preparation: structured written reasoning for acute upper GI bleeding management, including problem-list synthesis, risk stratification, restrictive transfusion, anticoagulation management, and integrated management planning.
SAQ 1 — Integrated Management (20 marks, 30 minutes)
Prompt: Outline your integrated management plan for this patient, including immediate resuscitation, risk stratification, anticoagulation and antiplatelet management, pharmacotherapy, and endoscopic strategy. Justify each decision with reference to evidence. [1]
Model Answer
Problem list (4 marks):
- Acute upper GI bleed with haemodynamic compromise (shock: SBP 94, tachycardia, cool peripheries)
- Likely non-variceal source — peptic ulcer probable (recent naproxen increase + aspirin); no stigmata of chronic liver disease, normal LFTs
- Anticoagulation with apixaban (bleeding risk) plus aspirin (dual haemostatic impairment)
- Significant cardiovascular comorbidity (recent NSTEMI with DES, AF) — high thrombotic risk if anticoagulation/antiplatelets are stopped
- CKD stage 3a (eGFR 42) — contributes to anaemia, alters drug handling
- Polypharmacy and multi-morbidity — coordinated care needed [1]
Immediate resuscitation and risk stratification (4 marks):
- ABCDE: secure IV access with two large-bore cannulae; crystalloid bolus (500 mL 0.9% sodium chloride, reassess); cross-match 2 to 4 units; monitor urine output (catheterise). Airway is currently protected — he is not actively vomiting now.
- Risk stratify with the Glasgow-Blatchford Score (GBS): his score is high (urea 14.2 = 4 points; Hb 72 in a man = 6 points; SBP 94 = 2 points; pulse >100 = 1 point) giving a GBS of at least 13 — confirmed high risk requiring admission and endoscopic therapy (Blatchford 2000).
- Restrictive transfusion: his Hb is 72 g/L and he has ischaemic heart disease (prior NSTEMI). Use a threshold around 80 g/L with a target of 80 to 90 g/L given the acute coronary context — Villanueva et al. (NEJM 2013) established that a restrictive strategy (threshold 70 g/L) improves survival, but the major exception is acute coronary syndrome or critical vascular disease where a higher threshold is reasonable. He should receive one to two units to reach 80 to 90 g/L. [1]
References4ShowHide
- [1]Blatchford O, Murray WR, Blatchford M A risk score to predict need for treatment for upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage Lancet, 2000.PMID 11073021
- [2]Rockall TA, Logan RF, Devlin HB, Northfield TC Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage Gut, 1996.PMID 8675081
- [3]Villanueva C, Colomo A, Bosch A, et al. Transfusion strategies for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding N Engl J Med, 2013.PMID 23281973
- [4]Lau JY, Sung JJ, Lee KK, et al. Effect of intravenous omeprazole on recurrent bleeding after endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers N Engl J Med, 2000.PMID 10922420